1,182
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Early detection of cognitive impairments with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with uncomplicated and complicated mild traumatic brain injury

, , , , , & show all
Pages 189-197 | Received 04 Oct 2017, Accepted 26 Oct 2018, Published online: 02 Nov 2018

References

  • Chamelian L, Feinstein A. The effect of major depression on subjective and objective cognitive deficits in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neuro. 2006;18:33–38. doi:10.1176/jnp.18.1.33.
  • Marshall S, Bayley M, McCullagh S, Velikonja D, Berrigan L. Clinical practice guidelines for mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58:257–67.
  • Ponsford J, Willmott C, Rothwell A, Cameron P, Kelly AM, Nelms R, Curran C, Ng K. Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:568–79.
  • Karr JE, Areshenkoff CN, Garcia-Barrera MA. The neuropsychological outcomes of concussion: a systematic review of meta-analyses on the cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2014;28:321–36.
  • Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Côté P, Hincapié CA, Holm LW, Hartvigsen J, Donovan J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Kristman VL, et al. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:S132–S51. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.299.
  • Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Côté P, Hincapié CA, Kristman VL, Holm LW, Borg J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Hartvigsen J. Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:S152–S73. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.300.
  • Frencham KA, Fox AM, Maybery M. Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review of research since 1995. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:334–51. doi:10.1080/13803390490520328.
  • Binder LM, Rohling ML, Larrabee GJ. A review of mild head trauma: I. Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;1:421–31. doi:10.1080/01688639708403870.
  • von Wild K. Posttraumatic rehabilitation and one-year outcome following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI): data from the well defined population based German Prospective Study 2000–2002. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;101:55–60.
  • Spitz G, Ponsford JL, Rudzki D, Maller JJ. Association between cognitive performance and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal multilevel examination. Neuropsychology. 2012;26:604. doi:10.1037/a0029239.
  • Sherer M, Sander AM, Nick TG, High WM, Malec JF, Rosenthal M. Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: findings from the TBI model systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):183–92.
  • Ponsford J, Draper K, Schönberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14(2):233–42. doi:10.1017/S1355617708080272.
  • Wojcik SM. Predicting mild traumatic brain injury patients at risk of persistent symptoms in the emergency department. Brain Inj. 2014;28(4):422–30. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.884241.
  • Caplain S, Blancho S, Marque S, Montreuil M, Aghakhani N. Early detection of poor outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: predictive factors using a multidimensional approach a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2017 Dec 12;8:666. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00666.
  • Ontario Neurotraumatology Fondation. Guidelines for concussion mild traumatic brain injury & persistent symptoms. 2nd ed. [Internet]. Toronto (ON); 2013 Sept [accessed 2015 Sept 15]. http://onf.org/system/attachments/222/original/ONF_mTBI_Guidelines_2nd_Edition_CLINICAL.pdf.
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:304–08. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
  • Roalf DR, Moore TM, Mechanic-Hamilton D, Wolk DA, Arnold SE, Weintraub DA, Moberg PJ. Bridging cognitive screening tests in neurologic disorders: A crosswalk between the short Montreal Cognitive Assessment and mini-mental state examination. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.015.
  • Freitas S, Batista S, Afonso AC, Simões MR, de Sousa L, Cunha L, Santana I. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening test for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Appl Neuropsycho Adult. 2018 Jan–Feb;25(1):57–70.
  • Hendershott TR, Zhu D, Llanes S, Poston KL. Domain-specific accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment subsections in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;38:31–34. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.008.
  • Kletzel SL, Hernandez JM, Miskiel EF, Mallinson T, Pape TLB. Evaluating the performance of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in early stage Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;37:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.01.012.
  • Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S, Walker B, Saykin AJ. Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC geriatrics. 2015;15:107. doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3.
  • Copersino ML, Fals-Stewart W, Fitzmaurice G, Schretien DJ, Sokoloff J, Weiss RD. Rapid cognitive screening of patient with substance use disorders. Exp Clin Pychopharmacology. 2009;17:337–44. doi:10.1037/a0017260.
  • Godefroy O, Fickl A, Roussel M, Auribault C, Bugnicourt JM, Lamy C, Canaple S, Petitnicolas G. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment superior to the Mini-mental State Examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairement? A study with neuropsychological evaluation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2011;42:1712–16.
  • de Guise E, Alturki AY, LeBlanc J, Champoux MC, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Desjardins M, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsycho Adult. 2014;21(2):128–35.
  • Lim PA, McLean AM, Kilpatrick C, DeForge D, Iverson GL, Silverberg ND. Temporal stability and responsiveness of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment following acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2016;30:29–35. doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1079732.
  • Zhang H, Zhang XN, Zhang HL, Huang L, Ch QQ, Zhang X, Yun XP. Differences in cognitive profiles between traumatic brain injury and stroke: a comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;19:271–74.
  • Allison PD. Missing data. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc; 2001. 2001 p.
  • Althouse AD. Adjust for multiple comparisons? It’s not that simple. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(5):1644–45. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.024.
  • Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1(1):43–46. doi:10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010.
  • Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1983.
  • Dikmen SS, Corrigan JD, Levin HS, Machamer J, Stiers W, Weisskopf MG. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24:430–38. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c133e9.
  • Iverson GL, Franzen MD, Lovell MR. Normative comparisons for the controlled oral word association test following acute traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;13:437–41. doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT437.
  • Lange RT, Iverson GL, Zakrzewski MJ, Ethel-King PE, Franzen MD. Interpreting the trail making test following traumatic brain injury: comparison of traditional time scores and derived indices. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:897–06. doi:10.1080/1380339049091290.
  • Iverson G. Complicated vs uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: acute neuropsychological outcome. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1335–44. doi:10.1080/02699050601082156.
  • de Guise E, Lepage JF, Tinawi S, LeBlanc J, Dagher J, Lamoureux J, Feyz M. Comprehensive clinical picture of patients with complicated vs uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:1113–30. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.506199.
  • Kobayashi S, Okada K, Yamashita K. Incidence of silent lacunar lesion in normal adults and its relation to cerebral blood flow and risk factors. Stroke. 1991;22:1379–83. doi:10.1161/01.STR.22.11.1379.
  • Bryan RN, Wells SW, Miller TJ, Elster AD, Jungreis CA, Poirier VC, Lind BK, Manolio TA. Infarctlike lesions in the brain: prevalence and anatomic characteristics at MR imaging of the elderly: data from the cardiovascular health study. Radiology. 1997;202:47–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988191.
  • Larouche E, Tremblay MP, Potvin O, Laforest S, Bergeron D, Laforce R, Monetta L, Boucher L, Tremblay P, Belleville S, et al. Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in middle-aged and elderly Quebec-French people. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31:819–26. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw076.
  • LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Feyz M, Lamoureux J. Early prediction of language impairment following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1391–01.
  • LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Champoux MC, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. Acute evaluation of conversational discourse skills in traumatic brain injury. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16:582–93. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.871335.
  • Rassovsky Y, Levi Y, Agranov E, Sela-Kaufman M, Sverdlik A, Vakil E. Predicting long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37:354–66. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1015498.
  • Senathi-Raja D, Ponsford JL, Schönberger M. Impact of age on long-term cognitive function after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2010;24:336. doi:10.1037/a0019312.
  • Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Hebbema JDF, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e165. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165.
  • Aharon-Peretz J, Kliot D, Amyel-Zvi E, Tomer R, Rakier A, Feinsod M. Neurobehavioural consequences of closed head injury in the elderly. Brain Inj. 1997;11:871–76.
  • Rapoport MJ, Herrmann N, Shammi P, Kiss A, Phillips A, Feinstein A. Outcome after traumatic brain injury sustained in older adulthood: a one-year longitudinal study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14:456–65. doi:10.1097/01.JGP.0000199339.79689.8a.
  • Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:634–42. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.634.14572.
  • Spitz G, Bigler ED, Abildskov T, Maller JJ, O’Sullivan R, Ponsford JL. Regional cortical volume and cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn. 2013;83:34–44. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.007.
  • Zuo L, Dong Y, Zhu R, Jin Z, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhao X, Sachdev P, Zhang W, Wang Y. Screening for cognitive impairment with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Chinese patients with acute mild stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a validation study. BMJ open. 2016;6:e011310. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011310.
  • Stern Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of reserve concepts. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8:448–60.
  • Kesler SR, Adams HF, Blasey CM, Bigler ED. Premorbid intellectual functioning, education, and brain size in traumatic brain injury: an investigation of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10:153–62. doi:10.1207/S15324826AN1003_04.
  • Chabok SY, Kapourchali SR, Leili EK, Saberi A, Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Effective factors on linguistic disorder during acute phase following traumatic brain injury in adults. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50:1444–50. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.029.
  • Rigon A, Voss MW, Turkstra LS, Mutlu B, Duff MC. Frontal and temporal structural connectivity is associated with social communication impairment following traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22:705–16. doi:10.1017/S1355617716000539.
  • Neyens V, Bruffaerts R, Liuzzi AG, Kalfas I, Peeters R, Keuleers E, Vogels R, De Deyne S, Storms G, Dupont P, et al. Representation of semantic similarity in the left intraparietal sulcus: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00402.
  • Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Lingsma HF, Yue JK, Ferguson AR, Gordon WA, Valadka AB, Schnyer DM, Okonkwo DO, Maas AIR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3‐month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2013;73:224–35. doi:10.1002/ana.23783.
  • Lee H, Wintermark M, Gean AD, Ghajar J, Manley GT, Mukherjee P. Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1049–56. doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0566.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.