1,825
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Assessing aggression following Acquired Brain Injury (ABI): a systematic review of assessment measures

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1491-1502 | Received 06 Feb 2019, Accepted 03 Aug 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019

References

  • Alderman N, Knight C, Henman C. Aggressive behavior observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: utility of the OAS-MNR in clinical audit and applied research. Brain Inj. 2002; 16(6):469–89. doi:10.1080/02699050110118458.
  • Alderman N. Prevalence, characteristics and causes of aggressive behavior observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: predictors and implications for management. Brain Inj. 2007; 21(9):891–911. doi:10.1080/02699050701543560.
  • Rao V, Rosenberg P, Bertrand M, Salehinia S, Spiro J, Vaishnavi S, Rastogi P, Noll K, Schretlen DJ, Brandt J, et al. Aggression after traumatic brain injury: prevalence and correlates. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;21(4):420–29. doi:10.1176/jnp.2009.21.4.420.
  • Tateno A, Jorge RE, Robinson RG. Clinical correlates of aggressive behavior after traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;15(2):155–60. doi:10.1176/jnp.15.2.155.
  • James AI, Young AW. Clinical correlates of verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviour after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013; 27(10):1162–72. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.804200.
  • Dyer KF, Bell R, McCann J, Rauch R. Aggression after traumatic brain injury: analysing socially desirable responses and the nature of aggressive traits. Brain Inj. 2006; 20(11):1163–73. doi:10.1080/02699050601049312.
  • Johansson SH, Jamora CW, Ruff RM, Pack NM. A biopsychosocial perspective of aggression in the context of traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008; 22(13–14):999–1006. doi:10.1080/02699050802530573.
  • Sabaz M, Simpson GK, Walker AJ, Rogers JM, Gillis I, Strettles B. Prevalence, comorbidities, and correlates of challenging behavior among community-dwelling adults with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29(2):19–30. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828dc590.
  • Braine ME. The experience of living with a family member with challenging behavior post acquired brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 2011; 43(3):156–64. doi:10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182135bb2.
  • Alderman N. Contemporary approaches to the management of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003; 13(1–2):211–40. doi:10.1080/09602010244000327.
  • Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, Endicott J, Williams D. The overt aggression scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986; 143(1):35–39. doi:10.1176/ajp.143.1.35.
  • Hart T, Seignourel PJ, Sherer M. A longitudinal study of awareness of deficit after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009; 19(2):161–76. doi:10.1080/09602010802188393.
  • Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG, Whyte J, Thompson RN, Yablon SA. Early impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(2):168–76. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50045.
  • Malec JF, Machulda MM, Moessner AM. Differing problem perceptions of staff, survivors, and significant others after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997; 12(3):1–13. doi:10.1097/00001199-199706000-00002.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264–69. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
  • Allely CS. Prevalence and assessment of traumatic brain injury in prison inmates: a systematic PRISMA review. Brain Inj. 2016; 30(10):1161–80. doi:10.1080/02699052.2016.1191674.
  • Yang CC, Khalifa N, Völlm B. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017; 48(5):737–50. doi:10.1017/S003329171700232X.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual. Amsterdam (NL): Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute; 2018. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/cosmin-tools/.
  • Cusimano MD, Holmes SA, Sawicki C, Topolovec-Vranic J. Assessing aggression following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of validated aggression scales. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29(2):172–84. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31827c7d15.
  • Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemol Community Health. 1998; 52(6):377–84. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377.
  • Whitling P, Rutjes A, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003; 3(1):25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.
  • Corrigan JD. Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989; 11(2):261–77. doi:10.1080/01688638908400888.
  • Corrigan JD, Bogner JA. Factor structure of the agitated behavior scale. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994; 16(3):386–92. doi:10.1080/01688639408402649.
  • Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Stange M, Rabold D. Reliability of the agitated behavior scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(1):91–96.
  • Dickens G, Alderman N, Bowers L. Potential severity of aggressive behaviour after acquired brain injury: implications for recording. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011; 18(7):586–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01707.x.
  • Juengst SB, Terhorst L, Dicianno BE, Niemeier JP, Wagner AK. Development and content validity of the behavioral assessment screening tool (BASTβ). Disabil Rehabil. 2018;1–7. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1423403.
  • James A. Verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behavior following brain injury [Doctoral dissertation]. York (UK): University of York; 2012.
  • Royle J, Whitehill Y. Development of a clinical screening tool to differentiate levels of challenging patient behaviour. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2010; 17(8):405–15. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.8.49297.
  • Gouick J. Staff ratings of challenging behaviour in an acquired brain injury population [Doctoral thesis]. Edinburgh (UK): University of Edinburgh; 2000.
  • Ashley MJ, Persel CS, Clark MC. Validation of an independent living scale for post-acute rehabilitation applications. Brain Inj. 2001; 15(5):435–42. doi:10.1080/02699050118777.
  • Jackson D, Turner-Stokes L, Murray J, Leese M. Validation of the memory and behavior problems checklist-1990R for use in acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007; 21(8):817–24. doi:10.1080/02699050701481563.
  • Yang CC, Huang SJ, Lin WC, Tsai YH, Hua MS. National Taiwan University irritability scale: evaluating irritability in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 2011; 12(3):200–09. doi:10.1375/brim.12.3.200.
  • Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Seel R, Serio CD. Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77(2):116–24. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90155-0.
  • Weinfurt KP, Willke R, Glick HA, Schulman KA. Towards a composite scoring solution for the neurobehavioral functioning inventory. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1–2):17–24.
  • Awad CP. Establishing the validity of the neurobehavioural functioning inventory [doctoral dissertation]. Columbia: University of Missouri; 2003.
  • Czuba KJ, Kersten P, Kayes NM, Smith GA, Barker-Collo S, Taylor WJ, McPherson KM. Measuring neurobehavioral functioning in people with traumatic brain injury: rasch analysis of neurobehavioral functioning inventory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016; 31(4):59–68. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000170.
  • Kilmer RP, Demakis GJ, Hammond FM, Grattan KE, Cook JR, Kornev AA. Use of the neuropsychiatric inventory in traumatic brain injury: a pilot investigation. Rehabil Psychol. 2006; 51(3):232. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.51.3.232.
  • Malec JF, Stump TE, Monahan PO, Kean J, Neumann D, Hammond FM. Rasch analysis, dimensionality, and scoring of the neuropsychiatric inventory irritability and aggression subscales in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99(2):281–88. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.020.
  • Alderman N, Knight C, Morgan C. Use of a modified version of the overt aggression scale in the measurement and assessment of aggressive behaviours following brain injury. Brain Inj. 1997; 11(7):503–23. doi:10.1080/bij.11.7.503.523.
  • Giles GM, Mohr JD. Overview and inter-rater reliability of an incident-based rating scale for aggressive behaviour following traumatic brain injury: the Overt Aggression Scale–Modified for Neurorehabiltation–Extended (OAS-MNR-E). Brain Inj. 2007; 21(5):505–11. doi:10.1080/02699050701311729.
  • Kelly G, Todd J, Simpson G, Kremer P, Martin C. The Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS): a tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community settings. Brain Inj. 2006; 20(3):307–19. doi:10.1080/02699050500488074.
  • Kelly G, Simpson GK, Brown S, Kremer P, Gillett L. The Overt Behaviour Scale–Self-Report (OBS-SR) for acquired brain injury: exploratory analysis of reliability and validity. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;1–9. doi:10.1080/09602011.2017.1322523.
  • Alderman N, Wood RL, Williams C. The development of the St Andrew’s-Swansea neurobehavioural outcome scale: validity and reliability of a new measure of neurobehavioural disability and social handicap. Brain Inj. 2011; 25(1):83–100. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.532849.
  • Alderman N, Williams C, Knight C, Wood RL. Measuring change in symptoms of neurobehavioural disability: responsiveness of the St Andrew’s-Swansea neurobehavioural outcome scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017; 32(8):951–62. doi:10.1093/arclin/acx026.
  • Alderman N, Williams C, Wood RL. When normal scores don’t equate to independence: recalibrating ratings of neurobehavioural disability from the ‘St Andrew’s–Swansea neurobehavioural outcome scale’ to reflect context-dependent support. Brain Inj. 2018; 32(2):218–29. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1406989.
  • Montgomery GK, Solberg KB, Mathison A, Arntson-Schwalbe S. Measuring perceived difficulty in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation: the Sister Kenny symptom management scale. Brain Inj. 2010; 24(12):1455–67. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.506634.
  • Bowers L, Nijman H, Palmstierna T. The attempted and actual assault scale (attacks). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007; 16(3):171–76. doi:10.1002/mpr.219.
  • Harris P, Humphreys J, Thomson G. A checklist of challenging behaviour: the development of a survey instrument. Ment Handicap Res. 1994; 7(2):118–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.1994.tb00120.x.
  • Allen RS, Burgio LD, Roth DL, Ragsdale R, Gerstle J, Bourgeois MS, Dijkstra K, Teri L. The revised memory and behavior problems checklist-nursing home: instrument development and measurement of burden among certified nursing assistants. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(4):886–95. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.886.
  • Roth DL, Gitlin LN, Coon DW, Stevens AB, Burgio LD, Gallagher-Thompson D, Belle SH, Burns R. Psychometric analysis of the revised memory and behavior problems checklist: factor structure of occurrence and reaction ratings. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(4):906–15. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.906.
  • Teri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, Uomoto J, Zarit S, Vitaliano PP. Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychol Aging. 1992; 7(4):622–31. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.622.
  • Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994; 44(12):2308–2308. doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308.
  • Cummings JL. The neuropsychiatric inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997; 48(5 Suppl 6):10–16. doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5_suppl_6.10s.
  • Bowers L, Stewart D, Papadopoulos C, Dack C, Ross J, Khanom H, Jeffery D. Inpatient violence and aggression: A literature review. 2011. Report from the conflict and containment reduction research programme. London (UK): Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London. 2011. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b98f/4ff17c264fd919542dcc14905b280c8776b8.pdf.
  • Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Côté P, Hincapié CA, Kristman VL, Holm LW, Borg J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Hartvigsen J. Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(3):152–73. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.300.
  • Levack WM, Kayes NM, Fadyl JK. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32(12):986–99. doi:10.3109/09638281003775394.
  • Paxton R, Anslow P, MilneD GB. Evaluation of a new record system for aggressive incidents in mental health services. J Ment Health. 1997; 6(2):149–68. doi:10.1080/09638239718914.
  • Hart T, Whyte J, Polansky M, Millis S, Hammond FM, Sherer M, Bushnik T, Hanks R, Kreutzer J. Concordance of patient and family report of neurobehavioral symptoms at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phy Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(2):204–13. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50019.
  • Watts R, Perlesz A. Psychosocial outcome risk indicator: predicting psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1999; 13(2):113–24. doi:10.1080/026990599121773.
  • Baker KA, Schmidt MF, Heinemann AW, Langley M, Miranti SV. The validity of the Katz Adjustment Scale among people with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 1998; 43(1):30–40. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.43.1.30.
  • Palav A, Ortega A, McCaffrey RJ. Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 content scales: A preliminary study with brain-injured patients. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;16(3):275–83.
  • Till C, Christensen BK, Green RE. Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009; 23(7–8):655–65. doi:10.1080/02699050902970794.
  • Johansson SH, Jamora CW, Ruff RM, Pack NM. A biopsychosocial perspective of aggression in the context of traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008; 22(13–14):999–1006. doi:10.1080/02699050802530573.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.