Exposure to uncertainty mediates the effects of traumatic brain injury on probabilistic decision-making in rats

References

• Center for disease control. Injury prevention and control: traumatic brain injury [ Webpage]; 2017 [accessed 2017]. www.cdc.gov/TraumaticBrainInjury/.
   Google Scholar
• Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev. 2006;12:212–18.doi:10.1136/ip.2005.010983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgaljardic DJ, Seale GS, Schaefer LA, Temple RO, Foreman J, Elliott TR.Psychiatric disease and post-acute traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(23):1911–25.doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves RR, Panguluri RL.Neuropsychiatric complications of traumatic brain injury. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011;49(3):42–50.doi:10.3928/02793695-20110201-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry DC, Sturm VE, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, Bullock T, Boeve BF, Miller BL, Guskiewicz KM, Berger MS, Kramer JH, et al.Association of traumatic brain injury with subsequent neurological and psychiatric disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(2):511–26.doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS14503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanek PM, Jackson TC, Jha R, Clark RS, Okonkwo DO, Bayir H, Poloyac SM, Wagner AK, Empey PE, Conley YP, et al. Paths to successful translation of new therapies for severe TBI in the golden age of traumatic brain injury research: a Pittsburgh vision. J Neurotrauma. 2019. ePub, ahead of print. doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6203.
   Google Scholar
• Saatman KE, Duhaime A-C, Bullock R, Maas AIR, Valadka A, Manley GT.Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(7):719–38.doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitnay GA, Zitnay KM, Povlishock JT, Hall ED, Marion DW, Trudel T, Zafonte RD, Zasler N, Nidiffer FD, DaVanzo J, et al.Traumatic brain injury research priorities: the Conemaugh international brain injury symposium. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(10):1135–52.doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Arrastia R, Kochanek PM, Bergold P, Kenney K, Marx CE, Grimes CJB, Loh LTCY, Adam LTCGE, Oskvig D, Curley KC, et al.Pharmacotherapy of traumatic brain injury: state of the science and the road forward: report of the department of defense neurotrauma pharmacology workgroup. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(2):135–58.doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marklund N, Hillered L.Animal modelling of traumatic brain injury in preclinical drug development: where do we go from here? Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(4):1207–29.doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01163.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osier ND, Carlson SW, DeSana A, Dixon CE.Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(23):1861–82.doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonder Haar C, Martens KM, Riparip L-K, Rosi S, Wellington CL, Winstanley CA. Frontal traumatic brain injury increases impulsive decision making in rats: a potential role for the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-12. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(19):2790–800.doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonder Haar C, Lam FCW, Adams WA, Riparip L-K, Kaur S, Muthukrishna M, Rosi S, Winstanley CA.Frontal traumatic brain injury in rats causes long-lasting impairments in impulse control that are differentially sensitive to pharmacotherapeutics and associated with chronic neuroinflammation. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016;7(11):1531–42.doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver TK, Ozga JE, Zhu B, Anderson KG, Martens KM, Vonder Haar C. Long-term deficits in risky decision-making after traumatic brain injury on a rat analog of the Iowa gambling task. Brain Res. 2019;1704:103–13.doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondi CO, Cheng JP, Tennant HM, Monaco CM, Kline AE.Old dog, new tricks: the attentional set-shifting test as a novel cognitive behavioral task after controlled cortical impact injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(10):926–37.doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mychasiuk R, Hehar H, Esser MJ. A mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) induces secondary attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-like symptomology in young rats. Behav Brain Res. 2015;286:285–92.doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper K, Ponsford J.Cognitive functioning ten years following traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(5):618–25.doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzaretti C, Kincheski GC, Pandolfo P, Krolow R, Toniazzo AP, Arcego DM, Couto-Pereira NDS, Zeidán-Chuliá F, Galvalisi M, Costa G, et al.Neonatal handling causes impulsive behavior and decreased pharmacological response to methylphenidate in male adult wistar rats. J Integr Neurosci. 2016;15(1):81–95.doi:10.1142/S0219635216500047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshavsky ME, Shumake J, Rosenthal AA, Kaddour‐Djebbar A, Gonzalez‐Lima F, Setlow B, Lee HJ. Impulsivity, risk‐taking, and distractibility in rats exhibiting robust conditioned orienting behaviors. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014;102(2):162–78.doi:10.1002/jeab.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MZ, Marshall AT, Kirkpatrick K. Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility. Behav Brain Res. 2017;327:54–64.doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrus MM, Winstanley CA.Dopamine D3 receptors modulate the ability of win-paired cues to increase risky choice in a rat gambling task. J Neurosci. 2016;36(3):785–94.doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-15.2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay M, Barrus MM, Cocker PJ, Baunez C, Winstanley CA. Increased motor impulsivity in a rat gambling task during chronic ropinirole treatment: potentiation by win-paired audiovisual cues. Psychopharmacology. 2019;236;1901–15. ePub, ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s00213-019-5173-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb FD, Li Z, Fisher DC, Zack MH, Fletcher PJ.Uncertainty exposure causes behavioural sensitization and increases risky decision-making in male rats: toward modelling gambling disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017;42(6):404.doi:10.1503/jpn.170003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb FD, Robbins TW, Winstanley CA.Serotonergic and dopaminergic modulation of gambling behavior as assessed using a novel rat gambling task. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34(10):2329–43.doi:10.1038/npp.2009.62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ.Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res. 1983;9(3):361–80.doi:10.1016/0166-4328(83)90138-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens KM, Vonder Haar C, Hutsell BA, Hoane MR. A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2505–12.doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cole JT, Yarnell A, Kean WS, Gold E, Lewis B, Ren M, McMullen DC, Jacobowitz DM, Pollard HB, O’Neill JT, et al. Craniotomy: true sham for traumatic brain injury, or a sham of a sham? J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:359–69.doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum WM. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974;22:231–42.doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferster CB, Skinner BF. Schedules of reinforcement. East Norwalk (CT): Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Leen-Feldner EW, Blumenthal H, Babson K, Bunaciu L, Feldner MT.Parenting-related childhood learning history and panic vulnerability: a test using a laboratory-based biological challenge procedure. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46(9):1009–16.doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SM, Gramling SE, Mancini T.The influence of life stress, personality, and learning history on illness behavior. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994;25(2):135–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagur J, Massoubre C, Casagranda L, Faure‐Conter C, Trombert‐Paviot B, Berger C.Psychiatric disorders in 130 survivors of childhood cancer: preliminary results of a semi‐standardized interview. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(5):847–53.doi:10.1002/pbc.25425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Enkhuizen J, Geyer MA, Young JW.Differential effects of dopamine transporter inhibitors in the rodent Iowa gambling task. Psychopharmacology. 2013;225(3):661–74.doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2854-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb FD, Winstanley CA.Lesions of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex differentially affect acquisition and performance of a rodent gambling task. J Neurosci. 2011;31(6):2197–204.doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5597-10.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb FD, Wong AC, Winstanley CA.Differential effects of environmental enrichment, social-housing, and isolation-rearing on a rat gambling task: dissociations between impulsive action and risky decision-making. Psychopharmacology. 2013;225(2):381–95.doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2822-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WK, Barkus C, Ferland J-MN, Sharp T, Winstanley CA.Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT 2C receptor blockade selectively improves decision making when rewards are paired with audiovisual cues in a rat gambling task. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(20):3091–104.doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4696-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferland JMN, Winstanley CA.Risk‐preferring rats make worse decisions and show increased incubation of craving after cocaine self‐administration. Addict Biol. 2016;22(4):991–1001.doi:10.1111/adb.12388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägele C, Friedel E, Kienast T, Kiefer F.How do we ‘learn’addiction? Risk factors and mechanisms getting addicted to alcohol. Neuropsychobiology. 2014;70(2):67–76.doi:10.1159/000364825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartor CE, Kranzler HR, Gelernter J.Rate of progression from first use to dependence on cocaine or opioids: a cross-substance examination of associated demographic, psychiatric, and childhood risk factors. Addict Behav. 2014;39(2):473–79.doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga JE, Povroznik JM, Engler-Chiurazzi EB, Vonder Haar C.Executive (dys)function after traumatic brain injury: special considerations for behavioral pharmacology. Behav Pharmacol. 2018;29(7):617–37.doi:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales JW, Wagner AK, Kline AE, Dixon CE.Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: a dopamine hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(7):981–1003.doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira MM, Murch WS, Clark L, Winstanley CA.Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence does not influence decision-making on a rodent gambling task, but does modulate amphetamine’s effect on impulsive action in adulthood. Behav Pharmacol. 2016;27(4):350–63.doi:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y-P, Wilkinson LS, Robbins TW.‘Waiting impulsivity’in isolation-reared and socially-reared rats: effects of amphetamine. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(9–10):1587–601.doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4579-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson NE, Ricciardi J, Wetzler C, Hanania T.Sub-optimal performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats was sensitive to methylphenidate, atomoxetine and d-amphetamine, but unaffected by the COMT inhibitor tolcapone. Neurosci Res. 2011;69(1):41–50.doi:10.1016/j.neures.2010.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar