Seeing minds in patients with disorders of consciousness

References

• Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American academy of neurology; the American congress of rehabilitation medicine; and the national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1699–709. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger C, Kitzinger J. Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(2):157–60. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolletta S, Pasi M, Avesani R. Vita tua, mors mea: the experience of family caregivers of patients in a vegetative state. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(7):1197–206. doi:10.1177/1359105314550348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamama-Raz Y, Zabari Y, Buchbinder E. From hope to despair, and back: being the wife of a patient in a persistent vegetative state. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(2):231–40. doi:10.1177/1049732312467537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehlmeyer K, Borasio GD, Jox RJ. How family caregivers’ medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(6):332–37. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward AF, Olsen AS, Wegner DM. The harm-made mind: observing victimization augments attribution of minds to vegetative patients, robots, and the dead. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(8):1437–45. doi:10.1177/0956797612472343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray K, Wegner DM. Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;96(3):505–20. doi:10.1037/a0013748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM.Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 2007;315(5812):619–619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaksh Y, Yehene E, Elyashiv M, Altman A. Partially dead, partially separated: establishing the mechanism between ambiguous loss and grief reaction among caregivers of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(2):345–56. doi:10.1177/0269215518802339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti AM, Černiauskaitė M, Leonardi M, Sattin D, Covelli V. Informal caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: experience of ambiguous loss. Brain Inj. 2015;29(4):473–80. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.990514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean S. The experience of ambiguous loss in families of brain injured ICU patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2010;15(2):66–75. doi:10.1111/ncr.2010.15.issue-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP, Harrison-Felix C, Marwitz JH. The traumatic brain injury model systems: history and contributions to clinical service and research. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(2):81–91. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181cd3528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53. doi:10.1212/WNL.58.3.349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state: parts I and II. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(21):1499–508. 1572–1579. doi:10.1056/NEJM199405263302107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1263–78. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GW, Ussher JM. Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities. 2001;4(3):293–314. doi:10.1177/136346001004003002.
   Google Scholar
• Singer D, Hunter M. The experience of premature menopause: a thematic discourse analysis. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1996;17(1):63–81. doi:10.1080/02646839908404585.
   Google Scholar
• Frith H, Gleeson K. Clothing and embodiment: men managing body image and appearance. Psychol Men Masc. 2004;5(1):40–48. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ. Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, (CA): Altamira Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley P.Analysing qualitative data: more than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian J Qual Res. 2009;2(2):6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher HL, Frith CD. Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends Cognit Sci. 2003;7(2):77–83. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happé F, Falkai P, Maier W, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Zilles K. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1):170–81. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray K, Wegner DM. Blaming god for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind. Personality Soc Psychol Rev. 2010;14(1):7–16. doi:10.1177/1088868309350299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray K, Wegner DM. Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition. 2012;125(1):125–30. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron‐Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The ‘Reading the mind in the eyes’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42(2):241–51. doi:10.1111/jcpp.2001.42.issue-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss P. Ambiguous loss theory: challenges for scholars and practitioners. Fam Relat. 2007;56(2):105–11. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00444.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss P. The trauma and complicated grief of ambiguous loss. Pastoral Psychol. 2010;59(2):137–45. doi:10.1007/s11089-009-0264-0.
   Google Scholar
• Betz G, Thorngren JM. Ambiguous loss and the family grieving process. Family J. 2006;14(4):359–65. doi:10.1177/1066480706290052.
   Google Scholar