Cognitive strategy use in adults with acquired brain injury

References

• Toglia JP, Rodger SA, Polatajko HJ. Anatomy of cognitive strategies: a therapist’s primer for enabling occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(4):225–36. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler RS. Cognitive variability. Dev Sci. 2007;10(1):104–09. doi:10.1111/desc.2007.10.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson G, Secheny T, Lane-Brown A, Strettles B, Ferry K, Phillips J. Post-acute rehabilitation for people with traumatic brain injury: a model description and evaluation of the liverpool hospital transitional living program. Brain Impairment. 2004;5(1):67–80. doi:10.1375/brim.5.1.67.35401.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa A, McDonald S, Rushby J, Li S, Dimoska A, James C. Understanding deficits in empathy after traumatic brain injury: the role of affective responsivity. Cortex. 2011;47(5):526. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(2):157–72. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.2.157.13642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong KNK, Howie DR. Effects of an explicit problem-solving skills training program using a metacomponential approach for outpatients with acquired brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(5):525. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.5.525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bootes K, Chapparo C. Difficulties with multitasking on return to work after TBI: a critical case study. Work. 2010;36(2):207–16. doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-1021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tate R, Kennedy M, Ponsford J, Douglas J, Velikonja D, Bayley M, Stergiou-Kita M. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part III: executive function and self-awareness. J Head Trauma Rehabi. 2014;29(4):338–52. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Tate R, Douglas JM, Turkstra LS, Ponsford J, Stergiou-Kita M, Kua A, Bragge P. INCOG guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: methods and overview. J Head Trauma Rehabi. 2014;29(4):290–306. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapparo C, Ranka J. The perceive, recall, plan and perform system of task analysis. In: Chapparo C, Ranka J, editors. Occupational performance model (Australia), monograph 1. Sydney: Total Print Control; 1997. p. 189–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chapparo C, Ranka J, Nott MT. Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform (PRPP) system of task analysis. In: Curtin M, Egan M, Adams J, editors. Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment: promoting occupation and participation. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017. p. 236–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay PH, Norman DA. Human information processing: an introduction to psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Romiszowski A. Designing instructional systems. London: Hogan Page; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Chapparo C, Ranka J. The PRPP system of task analysis: user’s training manual. Lidcombe: The School of Occupation and Leisure Sciences, The University of Sydney; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fry K, O’Brien L. Using the Perceive, Recall, Plan And Perform system to assess cognitive deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: a case study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2002;49(4):182–87. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1630.2002.00337.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C. Measuring information processing in a client with extreme agitation following traumatic brain injury using the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform System of Task analysis. Aust Occup Ther J. 2008;55(3):188–98. doi:10.1111/aot.2008.55.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C. Exploring the validity of the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform system of task analysis: cognitive strategy use in adults with brain injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75(6):256–63. doi:10.4276/030802212X13383757345067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C, Heard R. Reliability of the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform system of task analysis: a criterion-referenced assessment. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(5):307–14. doi:10.1111/aot.2009.56.issue-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Validity of the Functional Independence Measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(8):828–34. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90195-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the Functional Independence Measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531–36. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-U.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnson J, Rossitier D, Petruckevitch A, Thompson AJ. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability Rehabil. 1995;17(1):10–14. doi:10.3109/09638289509166622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher K, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fieldler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226–32. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEBERT R, CARRIER R, BILODEAU A. The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing. 1988;17(5):293–302. doi:10.1093/ageing/17.5.293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dubuc N. Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. Age Ageing. 1995;24(5):402–06. doi:10.1093/ageing/24.5.402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL. Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: the care and needs scale (CANS). Brain Inj. 2004;18(5):445–60. doi:10.1080/02699050310001641183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo C, Tate RL, Aird V, Allaous J, Browne S, Carr B, Coulston C, Diffley L, Gurka J, Hummell J, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(6):905–12. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon K, Malec JF, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA. Mayo-portland adaptability inventory-4. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(4):314. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182562f04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean J, Malec JF, Altman IM, Swick S. Rasch measurement analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) in a community-based rehabilitation sample. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(5):745. doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicher V, Murphy MP, Murphy TF, Malec JF. Progress assessed with the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1):100. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Facets computer program for many-facet rasch measurement. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsetps.com; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Lezak MD. Manual for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4): the center for outcome measurement in brain injury; 2005. http://www.tbims.org/combi/mpai.
   Google Scholar
• Hopman K, Tate RL, McCluskey A. Community-based rehabilitation following brain injury: comparison of a transitional living program and a home-based program. Brain Impairment. 2012;13(1):44–61. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2012.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(3):367–74. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.21525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace GM, Schlund MW, Hazard-Haupt T, Christensen JR, Lashno M, McIver J, K Peterson, Karyn A, Morgan GM. Characteristics and outcomes of a home and community-based neurorehabilitation programme. Brain Inj. 1999;13(7):535. doi:10.1080/026990599121430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17(3):191–209. doi:10.1097/00001199-200206000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coehlo C, Yorkston K, Kennedy M, Sohlberg MM, Avery J. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj. 2007;21(8):769–805. doi:10.1080/02699050701482470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS, Coelho C. Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Semin Speech Lang. 2005;26(4):256–67. doi:10.1055/s-2005-922104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, Levine B, Lemsky C, Polatajko HJ. Using the Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP) with adults with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(2):115–27. doi:10.1177/000841740907600209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toglia JP, Goverover Y, Johnston MV, Dain B. Application of the multicontextual approach in promoting learning and transfer of strategy use in an individual with TBI and executive dysfunction. OTJR. 2011;31(Suppl 1):S53–S60. doi:10.3928/15394492-20101108-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12):1596–615. doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greber C, Ziviani J, Rodger S. The four-quadrant model of facilitated learning (part 1): using teaching-learning approaches in occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54(Supplement 1):S31–9.
   Google Scholar
• Giles G, Radomski M, Champagne T, Corcoran M, Gillen G, Kuhaneck H, Morrison MNadeau B. cognition, cognitive rehabilitation, and occupational performance. American Journal Of Occupational Therapy. 2013;67:S9–S31. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2013.67S9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar