Rasch analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a mild traumatic brain injury sample

References

• Broshek D, De Marco A, Freeman J. A review of post-concussion syndrome and psychological factors associated with concussion. Brain Inj. 2015;29(2):228–37. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.974674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Kahan M, Te Ao B-, McPherson K, Starkey N, Feigin V. Work limitations 4 years after mild traumatic brain injury: a cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb 8:S0003-9993(17)30067–9. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.010. Epub ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg N, Gardner A, Brubacher J, Panenka W, Li Jun J, Iverson G. Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(8):517–26. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson L, Ranson J, Ferguson A, Giacino J, Okonkwo D, Valadka A, Manley GT, McCrea MA, TRACK-TBI Investigators. Validating multi-dimensional outcome assessment using the traumatic brain injury common data elements: an analysis of the TRACK-TBI pilot study sample. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:3158–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Pettigrew L, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the glasgow outcome scale and the extended glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–85. doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg N, Crane P, Dams-O’Connor K, Holdnack J, Ivins B, Lange R, Manley GT, McCrea M, Iverson GL. Developing a cognition endpoint for traumatic brain injury clinical trials. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:363–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranson J, Magnus B, Temkin N, Dikmen S, Giacino J, Okonkwo D, Valadka AB, Manley GT, Nelson LD, Cooper SR, et al. Diagnosing the GOSE: structural and psychometric properties using item response theory, a TRACK-TBI pilot study. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson L, Ranson J, Ferguson A, Giacino J, Okonkwo D, Valadka A, Manley GT, McCrea MA, TRACK-TBI Investigators. Validating multidimensional outcome assessment using the TBI common data elements: an analysis of the TRACK- TBI pilot sample. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:3156–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange R, Iverson G, Brubacher J, Mädler B, Heran M. Diffusion tensor imaging findings are not strongly associated with postconcussional disorder 2 months following mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(3):188–98. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e318217f0ad.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan S, de Groot J, Jacobs B, van der Naalt J. The association between microhaemorrhages and post - traumatic functional outcome in the chronic phase after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(10):963–69. doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1898-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer R, Drag L, Walker S, Bieliauskas L. Self-reported cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury are poorly associated with neuropsychological performance in OIF/OEF veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(6):521–30. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2009.11.0181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waljas M, Iverson G, Lange R, Hakulinen U, Dastidar P, Huhtala H, Liimatainen S, Hartikainen K, Öhman J. A prospective biopsychosocial study of the persistent post-concussion symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:534–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson G, McCracken L. ‘Postconcussive’ symptoms in persons with chronic pain. Brain Inj. 1997;11(11):783–90. doi:10.1080/026990597122990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg N, Berkner P, Atkins J, Zafonte R, Iverson G. Relationship between short sleep duration and preseason concussion testing. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(3):226–31. doi:10.1097/JSM.0000000000000241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstün T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Malta: WHO Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, Luciano J. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo C-Y, Liou T-H, Chang K-H, Chi W-C, Escorpizo R, Yen C-F, Liao H-F, Chiou H-Y, Chiu W-T, Tsai J-T, et al. Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:4116–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrett S, Samaranayaka A, Wilson S, Langley J, Ameratunga S, Cameron I, Lilley R, Wyeth E, Davie G. Prevalence and predictors of sub-acute phase disability after injury among hospitalised and non-hospitalised groups: a longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Silver B. Measuring community integration in persons with limb trauma and amputation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:561–80. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltychev M, Bärlund E, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Paltamaa J, Laimi K. A study of the psychometric properties of 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 in a large population of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin Rehabil. 2016;31(2):262–72. doi:10.1177/0269215516631385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedema S, Muller V, Yaghmaian R, Emucu E, Ruiz D, Chan F. Psychometric validation of the World Health Organisation disability schedule 2.0-12-item version in persons with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rehabil. 2016;82(3):28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Kaljonen A, Laimi K. Utility of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule and the World Health Organization minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51:40–46. doi:10.2340/16501977-2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schröder S, Hurme S, Laimi K. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the WHO minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health versus conventional instruments in subacute stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51:675–82. doi:10.2340/16501977-2583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, Von Korff M, Ustun T. Normative data for the 12 item WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod M, Tremblay P, Graham K, Rehm J, Wells S. Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12‐item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016;25:243–54. doi:10.1002/mpr.1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjonnesen K, Bulloch A, Williams J, Lavorato D, Patten S. Characterization of disability in canadians with mental disorders using an abbreviated version of a DSM-5 emerging measure: the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(4):227–35. doi:10.1177/0706743716632514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks M, Garber B, Zamorski M. Disability and mental disorders in the canadian armed forces. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(Supplement 1):56S–63S. doi:10.1177/0706743716628853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvonen-Schroder S, Tenovuo O, Kaljonen A, Laimi K. Usability of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule in chronic traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:514–18. doi:10.2340/16501977-2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell D, Iverson G, Panenka W, Silverberg N. Preliminary validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(23):3256–61. doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N, Crawford S, Wenden F, Moss N, Wade D. The rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995;242:587–92. doi:10.1007/BF00868811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. BM SPSS statistics for mac, version 24.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM 2030. Perth, (WA): RUMM Laboratory; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert R, Tennant A, Turner-Stokes L. Rasch analysis of the beck depression inventory-II in a neurological rehabilitation sample. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):8–17. doi:10.3109/09638280902971398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18. doi:10.1348/014466506X96931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell-Parker K, Medvedev O, Krägeloh C, Siegert R. Rasch analysis of the frost multidimensional perfectionism scale. Aust J Psychol. 2018;70:258–68. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirchberger I, Braitmayer K, Coenen M, Oberhauser C, Meisinger C.Feasibility and psychometric properties of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in a population-based sample of patients with myocardial infarction from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry. Popul Health Metr. 2014;12(27). doi:10.1186/s12963-014-0027-8)
   Google Scholar
• Üstün T, Kastanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring health and disability. Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Luciano J, Ayuso-Mateos J, Aguado J, Fernandez A, Serrano-Blanco A, Roca M, Haro JM. The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(45). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger H, Barwick F, Kip K, Kretzmer T, Vanderploeg R. Post-concussive symptom complaints and potentially malleable positive predictors. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(3):343–55. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.774438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theadom A, Parag V, Dowell T, McPherson K, Starkey N, Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Ameratunga S, Feigin VL. Persistent problems 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal population study in New Zealand. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:e16–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahniser E, Temkin N, Machamer J, Barber J, Manley G, Markowitz A, Dikman S, TRACK TBI Investigators. The functional status examination in mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI sub-study. Arch Clin Neuropsychology. 2019;34(7):1165–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer J, Manley G, Yuh E, Nelson L, Temkin N, Adeoye O, Badjatia N, Boase K, Bodien Y, et al. Functional status examination versus glasgow outcome scale extended as outcome measures in traumatic brain injuries: how do they compare? J Neurotrauma. 2019;36:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer J, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:127–40. doi:10.1089/08977150150502578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson G, Lange R, Brooks B, Ashton Rennison V. “Good old days” bias following mild traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:17–37. doi:10.1080/13854040903190797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar