References
- Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, Andelic N, Bell MJ, Belli A, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Büki A, Chesnut RM, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987–1048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X.
- Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. 2008. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 7(8):728–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9
- Maegele M, Lefering R, Sakowitz O, Kopp MA, Schwab JM, Steudel W-I, Unterberg A, Hoffmann R, Uhl E, Marzi I. The incidence and management of moderate to severe head injury. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116(10):167–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0167. Cited in: PMID: 30995953.
- Anderson V, Northam E, Wrennall J. Developmental neuropsychology: a clinical approach. Second ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge; 2019. p. 575.
- Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, Spitz G. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.2997. Cited in: PMID: 23889321.
- McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press, 2014. Brain, Behaviour and Cognition.
- Togher L, McDonald S, and Code C. Brain, Behaviour and Cognition. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. In: McDonald S, Togher L, and Code C, editors. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press; 2014. p. 1–25.
- Marini A, Zettin M, Bencich E, Bosco FM, Galetto V. Severity effects on discourse production after TBI. J Neurolinguistics. 2017;44:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.005.
- Douglas JM. 2010. Using the La Trobe communication questionnaire to measure perceived social communication ability in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment. 11(2):171–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.11.2.171
- Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):365–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0205). Cited in: PMID: 20360462.
- Cummings L, editor. Research in clinical pragmatics, Vol. 11. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy et psychology.
- Bambini V, Bara BG. Neuropragmatics. In: Östman J-O, Verschueren J, editors. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2012. p. 1–21.
- Ferstl EC, Guthke T, von CDY. Change of perspective in discourse comprehension: encoding and retrieval processes after brain injury. Brain Lang. 1999;70(3):385–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2151. Cited in: PMID: 10600227.
- McDonald S, Togher L, and Code C. Traumatic brain injury: basic features. In: McDonald S, Togher L, and Code C, editors. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. 2nd. London: Psychology Press;2014. p. 26–47. Brain, Behaviour and Cognition.
- McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. Brain, Behaviour and Cognition. The nature of cognitive deficits and psychosocial function following TBI. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press; 2014. p. 48–88.
- Lipton ML, Gulko E, Zimmerman ME, Friedman BW, Kim M, Gellella E, Gold T, Shifteh K, Ardekani BA, Branch CA. Diffusion-tensor imaging implicates prefrontal axonal injury in executive function impairment following very mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology. 2009;252(3):816–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2523081584. Cited in: PMID: 19567646.
- KIM J, Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M, Polansky M, Coslett HB. 2005. Executive function as a predictor of inattentive behavior after traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 11(4):434–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050563
- Ylvisaker M, DeBonis D. 2000. Executive Function Impairment in Adolescence. Top Lang Disord. 20(2):29–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020020-00005
- Miyake A, Friedman NP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):8–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458. Cited in: PMID: 22773897.
- Cannizzaro M, and Coelho CA. Communication following executive dysfunction. In: Peach RK, and Shapiro LP, editors. Cognition and acquired language disorders: an information processing approach. elsevier (Elsevier). 2012. p. 227–40.
- Thomsen IV, Thomsen IV. Evaluation and outcome of aphasia in patients with severe closed head trauma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;38(7):713–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.38.7.713. Cited in: PMID: 1159445.
- Bittner RM, Crowe SF. The relationship between naming difficulty and FAS performance following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20(9):971–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600909763. Cited in: PMID: 17062428.
- Zimmermann N, Scherer L, Ska B, Joanette Y, Fonseca R. Verbal fluency tasks: does time matter for identification of executive functioning and lexical-semantic deficits following right brain damage? Procedia - Social Behav Sci. 2011;23:211–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.243.
- Peach RK. The cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties in discourse after traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0081)
- Ellis C, Peach RK. Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(3):255–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2009-0476. Cited in: PMID: 19458433.
- Henry JD, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2004;18(4):621–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.4.621. Cited in: PMID: 15506829.
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association . Roles of speech-language pathologists in the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of individuals with cognitive-communication disorders: position statement [Position Statement]. 2005. Accessed 02 02 2222. Rockville.http://www.asha.org/policy
- Christman Buckingham SS, Sneed KE. Cognitive-Communication Disorder. In: Kreutzer JS, DeLuca J, Caplan B, editors. Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 1–8.
- MacDonald S. Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(13–14):1760–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1379613. Cited in: PMID: 29064304.
- Power E, Weir S, Richardson J, Fromm D, Forbes M, MacWhinney B, Togher L. Patterns of narrative discourse in early recovery following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2020;34:98–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2019.1682192. Cited in: PMID: 31661629.
- de Beaugrande R, Dressler WU. Introduction to Text Linguistics. A Pearson education print on demand ed. London, New York: Longman. 1981. Longman linguistics library, Vol. 26: 286.
- Stillar GF. Analyzing everyday texts: discourse, rhetoric, and social perspectives. Thousand Oaks, Calif., London, New Delhi: Sage. 1998. Rhetoric and society, Vol. 3: 206.
- Snow PC, Douglas J, Ponsford J. 1997. Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 11(10):947–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039708249421
- Lê K, Coelho C, Mozeiko J, Krueger F, Grafman J. 2012. Predicting story goodness performance from cognitive measures following traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 21(2):115–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0114)
- Brinker K. Linguistische Textanalyse: eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin: Schmidt. 2010. Grundlagen der Germanistik, Vol. 29: 160.
- Büttner J. Sprache und Kognition: Diskurspragmatik und Textverarbeitung bei Exekutivstörungen [ Zugl.: München, Univ., Diss., 2013. Tübingen: Stauffenburg; 2014. ( Zugl.: München, Univ., Diss.; vol 4). 296 p.
- Coelho CA. 1995. Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: a critical review of the recent literature. Aphasiology. 9(5):409–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039508248707
- Kintz S, Hibbs V, Henderson A, Andrews M, Wright HH. Discourse-based treatment in mild traumatic brain injury. J Commun Disord. 2018;76:47–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.08.001. Cited in: PMID: 30212715.
- Hill E, Claessen M, Whitworth A, Boyes M, Ward R. Discourse and cognition in speakers with acquired brain injury (ABI): a systematic review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(4):689–717. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12394. Cited in: PMID: 29781173.
- Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Inj. 1998;12(11):911–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598121981. Cited in: PMID: 9839026.
- Stubbs E, Togher L, Kenny B, Fromm D, Forbes M, MacWhinney B, McDonald S, Tate R, Turkstra L, Power E. Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(2):167–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1291989. Cited in: PMID: 29281420.
- Lê K, Coelho C, Mozeiko J, Krueger F, Grafman J. 2011. Measuring goodness of story narratives: implications for traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 25(6–7):748–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.539696
- Coelho CA. 2002. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 45(6):1232–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099)
- Blyth T, Scott A, Bond A, Paul E. A comparison of two assessments of high level cognitive communication disorders in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26(3):234–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.654587. Cited in: PMID: 22372411.
- Büttner J. Chapter 3. Neurolinguistic view into narrative processingIgl N, Zeman Seditors Perspectives on narrativity and narrative perspectivization 63–88 John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam 2016Linguistic Approaches to Literature
- Graesser AC, Singer M, Trabasso T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(3):371–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.3.371. Cited in: PMID: 7938337.
- Graesser AC, Wiemer-Hastings P, Wiemer-Hastings K. Constructing inferences and relations during text comprehensionSanders T, Schilperoord J, Spooren Weditors Text representation 249 John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam 2001Human Cognitive Processing
- Ferstl EC, Walther K, Guthke T, von CDY. Assessment of story comprehension deficits after brain damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27(3):367–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490515784. Cited in: PMID: 15969358.
- Schnotz W, Bannert M. 2003. Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learn Instruction. 13(2):141–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
- Steel J, Elbourn E, Togher L. 2021. Narrative discourse intervention after traumatic brain injury. Top Lang Disord. 41(1):47–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000241
- Elbourn E, Kenny B, Power E, Togher L. Psychosocial outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury in relation to discourse recovery: a longitudinal study up to 1 year post-injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(4):1463–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0204. Cited in: PMID: 31487472.
- Beushausen U, Wachtlin, B. Screening zur Verarbeitung der Makrostruktur bei neurologischen Patienten (MAKRO) Beushausen U, and Grötzbach H, editors. Testhandbuch Sprache in der Neurologie: diagnostikverfahren in Logopädie und Sprachtherapie. 2nd ed. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag; 2019. p. 201–208.
- McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: a new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18(3):219–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001. Cited in: PMID: 12802165.
- Ska B, Côté H, Ferré P, Joanette Y, Scherrer K, Schrott K, Bertoni B. MEC Testverfahren: protocole Montréal d’Evaluation de la Communication. Köln: ProLog; 2016.
- MacDonald S, Johnson CJ. Assessment of subtle cognitive-communication deficits following acquired brain injury: a normative study of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES). Brain Inj. 2005;19(11):895–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050400004294. Cited in: PMID: 16299932.
- MacDonald S. Cognitive-Communication Checklist for Acquired Brain Injury (CCCABI). Ontario, Canada: Guelph; 2015.
- Sohlberg MM, MacDonald S, Byom L, Iwashita H, Lemoncello R, Meulenbroek P, Ness B, O’Neil-Pirozzi TM. Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: state-of-the-art review of assessment tools. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(2):115–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1583280. Cited in: PMID: 30957561.
- van Dijk TA, Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1983. p. 418.
- Kintsch W. An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: the CI perspective. Discourse Process. 2005;39:125–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651676.
- Coelho CA, Grela B, Corso M, Gamble A, Feinn R. Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19(13):1139–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050500110678. Cited in: PMID: 16286327.
- Büttner J. MAKRO: Screening zur Verarbeitung der Makrostruktur von Texten bei neurologischen Patienten. Hofheim, Germany: NAT-Verlag; 2018. p. 214.
- Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D, Willmes K. Aachener Aphasie Test. Göttingen, Zürich, Toronto: Hogrefe; 1983.
- Boelen DHE, Allain P, Spikman JM, Fasotti L. Script generation and the dysexecutive syndrome in patients with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1091–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.608207. Cited in: PMID: 21902459.
- Mozeiko J, Le K, Coelho C, Krueger F, Grafman J. 2011. The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI. Aphasiology. 25(6–7):826–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.543983
- Petermann F, editor. WAIS-IV: deutschsprachige adaptation nach David Wechsler: manual 1, Grundlagen, Testauswertung and interpretation, 2nd ed. Frankfurt/M: Pearson, 2014. Always learning.
- Mathias JL, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(2):212–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.212. Cited in: PMID: 17402821.
- Tucha O, Lange KW. Turm von London. TL-D. Deutsche version. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004.
- Coelho CA. Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: progress, caveats, and needs. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28(2):122–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570. Cited in: PMID: 17427051.
- Hunt K. Differences in grammatical structures written at three grade levels (NCTE Research Report No. 3); 1965.
- Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1763–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864. Cited in: PMID: 29481436.
- Byom L, Turkstra LS. Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(4):501–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12289. Cited in: PMID: 27891725.
- Ylvisaker M, Szekeres SF. 1989. Metacognitive and executive impairments in head-injured children and adults. Top Lang Disord. 9(2):34–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-198903000-00005
- Ardila A. The executive functions in language and communication. In: Peach RK, and Shapiro LP, editors. Cognition and acquired language disorders: an information processing approach. 2012.St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby; p. 147–66.
- Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Inj. 1991;5(3):267–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059109008097. Cited in: PMID: 1718519.
- Riccio CA, Wolfe ME, Romine C, Davis B, Sullivan JR. The Tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(5):661–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.001. Cited in: PMID: 15271410.
- van Dijk TA. Macrostructures: an interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum Associates; 1980. p. 317.
- Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Inj. 1995;9(5):471–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059509008206. Cited in: PMID: 7550218.
- Singer M, Lea RB. Inference and reasoning in discourse comprehension. In: Schmid H-J editor, Cognitive pragmatics. Vol. 4 Handbooks of Pragmatics [HOPS]. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012:85–122.
- Ferstl EC, Guthke T, von CDY. 2002. Text comprehension after brain injury: left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes. Neuropsychology. 16(3):292–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.16.3.292
- Whiteside DM, Kealey T, Semla M, Luu H, Rice L, Basso MR, Roper B. Verbal fluency: language or executive function measure? Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23(1):29–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1004574. Cited in: PMID: 26111011.
- Aschenbrenner S, Tucha O, Lange KW. Regensburger Wortflüssigkeitstest (RWT). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001.
- Dressler WU, Stark HK, Vassilakou M, Rauchensteiner D, Tosic J, Weitzenauer SM, Wasner P, Pons C, Stark J, Brunner G. 2004. Textpragmatic impairments of figure-ground distinction in right-brain damaged stroke patients compared with aphasics and healthy controls. J Pragmat. 36(2):207–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00023-7
- Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell; 1990. p. 279.
- Büttner-Kunert J, Anzenberger M, Müller VP, Douglas J. Bewertung des Gesprächsverhaltens nach Schädel-Hirn-Trauma mit dem La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ): erste Ergebnisse der deutschen Replikationsstudie an neurologisch gesunden Kontrollprobanden. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör. 2021;e7–e15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1158-3151.