Advanced search
Publication Cover
Brain Injury Volume 37, 2023 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
206
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Validity of Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOSE) mobile application for assessment of outcome in traumatic brain injury patients

Dhaval Shuklaa Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-1929View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Bhushan Diwakar Thombreb Department of Neurosurgery, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IndiaView further author information
,
Priya Babyc College of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-2334View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Jayanthi Palaninathanc College of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaView further author information
,
Sivakami Subramanianc College of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaView further author information
,
PV Prathyushad Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaView further author information
&
Indira Devi Bhagavatulaa Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, IndiaView further author information
 show all
Pages 1215-1219 | Received 31 Jan 2023, Accepted 23 May 2023, Published online: 03 Jun 2023

References

  • Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the glasgow outcome scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44(4):285–93. doi:10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285.
  • Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113(6):435–41. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013.
  • Wilde EA, Whiteneck GG, Bogner J, Bushnik T, Cifu DX, Dikmen SS, French L, Giacino JT, Hart T, Malec JF, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1650–60.e17. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033.
  • Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480–84. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5. PMID: 46957.
  • Najenson T, Mendelson L, Schechter I, David C, Mintz N, Groswasser Z. Rehabilitation after severe head injury. ScandJ Rehab. 1974;6:5–14.
  • McCrea MA, Giacino JT, Barber J, Temkin NR, Nelson LD, Levin HS, Dikmen S, Stein M, Bodien YG, Boase K, et al. Functional outcomes over the first year after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the prospective, longitudinal TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Neurol. PMID: 34228047; PMCID: PMC8261688 2021 Aug 1; 788: 982–92. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2043
  • Yeatts SD, Palesch YY, Temkin N. Biostatistical issues in TBI clinical trials In: .Skolnick BE Alves WM editors. Handbook of neuroemergency clinical trials. Academic. San Diego, CA. 2017pp. 167–85. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804064-5.00009-6
  • Deepika A, Devi BI, Shukla D. Predictive validity of disability rating scale in determining functional outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurol India. 2017;65(1):83–86. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.198228.
  • Anderson SI, Housely AM, Jones PA, Slattery J, Miller JD. Miller JD.Glasgow outcome scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993;7(4):309–17. doi:10.3109/02699059309034957.
  • Wilson TL, Edwards P, Fiddes H, Stewart E, Teasdale GM. Reliability of postal questionnaires for the glasgow outcome scale. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19(9):999–1005. doi:10.1089/089771502760341910.
  • Wilson TL, Pettigrew EL, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the glasgow outcome scale and the extended glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–85. doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
  • Levin HS, Boake C, Song J, McCauley S, Contant C, Diaz-Marchan P, Brundage S, Goodman H, Kotrla KJ. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended glasgow outcome scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:575–84. doi:10.1089/089771501750291819.
  • Marmarou A. The American brain injury consortium. 1st ed. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
  • Wilson TL, Slieker JA, Legrand V, Murray GD, Stocchetti N, Maas AI. Observer variation in the assessment of outcome in traumatic brain injury: experience from a multicenter, international randomized clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(1):123–29. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000279732.21145.9e.
  • Lu J, Murray GD, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Lingsma H, Mushkudiani N, Choi S, Maas AI, Marmarou A. Effects of Glasgow Outcome Scale misclassification on traumatic brain injury clinical trials. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(6):641–51. doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0510.
  • Thombre B. 2021. GOSE score (Version 3.0.0) [ Mobile App]. Google Play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inrela.gose&hl=en&gl=US. 2020 Aug10.
  • Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96–106. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002.
  • Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: measures of agreement. Perspect Clin Res. 2017;8(4):187–91. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_123_17.
  • McMillan T, Wilson L, Ponsford J, Levin H, Teasdale G, Bond M. The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):477–85. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.89.
  • Wilson L, Boase K, Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Giacino JT, Markowitz AJ, Maas A, Menon DK, Teasdale G, Manley GT. A manual for the glasgow outcome scale-extended interview. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 1;38(17):2435–46. Epub 2021 Apr 6. PMID: 33740873; PMCID: PMC8390784. doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7527.
  • FDA. Digital health center for excellence. 2020 [ accessed 2022 Aug 21]. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health.
  • Guo C, Ashrafian H, Ghafur S, Fontana G, Gardner C, Prime M. Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—A call for innovative evidence generation approaches. npj Digit Med. 2020;3(1):110. doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00314-2.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.