156
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Memory for social media images following traumatic brain injury

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1334-1344 | Received 20 Apr 2022, Accepted 15 Oct 2023, Published online: 30 Oct 2023

References

  • Instagram: About Us [Internet]. 2020. https://about.instagram.com/about-us
  • Facebook: Company Info [Internet]. 2020. https://about.fb.com/company-info/
  • Meshi D, Tamir DI, Heekeren HR. The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):771–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004.
  • Choi M, Toma CL. Social sharing with friends and family after romantic breakups. J Media Psychol. 2017;29(3):166–72. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000226.
  • Deters FG, Mehl MR. Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013 Sep 1;4(5):579–86. doi:10.1177/1948550612469233.
  • Grieve R, Indian M, Witteveen K, Anne Tolan G, Marrington J. Face-to-face or Facebook: can social connectedness be derived online? Comput Human Behav. 2013 May;29(3):604–09. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017.
  • Morrow EL, Zhao F, Turkstra L, Toma C, Mutlu B, Duff MC. Computer-mediated communication in adults with and without moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: survey of social media use. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(3):e26586. doi:10.2196/26586.
  • Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher L, Dann S, Palmer S. Social media and people with traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of research informing a framework for rehabilitation clinical practice, policy, and training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(1):19–33. doi:10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00211.
  • Baker-Sparr C, Hart T, Bergquist T, Bogner J, Dreer L, Juengst S, Mellick D, O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Sander AM, Whiteneck GG, et al. Internet and social media use after traumatic brain injury: a traumatic brain injury model systems study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(1):E9–E17. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000305.
  • Kumar RG, Ornstein KA, Bollens‐Lund E, Watson EM, Ankuda CK, Kelley AS, Dams‐O’Connor K. Lifetime history of traumatic brain injury is associated with increased loneliness in adults: a US nationally representative study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(5):553–63. doi:10.1002/gps.5271.
  • Flynn MA, Rigon A, Kornfield R, Mutlu B, Duff MC, Turkstra LS. Characterizing computer-mediated communication, friendship, and social participation in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2019;33(8):1097–104. doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1616112.
  • Brunner M, Palmer S, Togher L, Hemsley B. ‘I kind of figured it out’: the views and experiences of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in using social media-self-determination for participation and inclusion online. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;54(2):221–33. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12405.
  • Frein ST, Jones SL, Gerow JE. When it comes to Facebook there may be more to bad memory than just multitasking. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(6):2179–82. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.031.
  • Mickes L, Darby RS, Hwe V, Bajic D, Warker JA, Harris CR, Christenfeld NJS. Major memory for microblogs. Mem Cognit. 2013;41(4):481–89. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0281-6.
  • Seyfi M, Soydaş A. The relationship between autobiographical memory and social media: sharing childhood photographs on social media. Glob Media J TR Ed. 2017;8(15):57–70.
  • Wang Q, Lee D, Hou Y. Externalising the autobiographical self: sharing personal memories online facilitated memory retention. Mem. 2017 Aug;25(6):772–76. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1221115.
  • Brown-Schmidt S, Tanenhaus MK. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach. Cogn Sci. 2008;32(4):643–84. doi:10.1080/03640210802066816.
  • Olson DR. Language and thought: aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychol Rev. 1970;77(4):257–73. doi:10.1037/h0029436.
  • Osgood C. Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, Chapter, Where do sentences come from?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971: pp. 497–529.
  • Clark HH, Schaefer EF. Concealing one’s meaning from overhearers. J Mem Lang. 1987;26(2):209–25. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90124-0.
  • Fleming JH, Darley JM. Mixed messages: the multiple audience problem and strategic communication. Soc Cogn. 1991;9(1):25–46. doi:10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.25.
  • Yoon SO, Stine-Morrow EA. Evidence of preserved audience design with aging in interactive conversation. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(4):613–23. doi:10.1037/pag0000341.
  • McKinley GL, Brown-Schmidt S, Benjamin AS. Memory for conversation and the development of common ground. Mem Cognit. 2017;45(8):1281–94. doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0730-3.
  • Yoon SO, Benjamin AS, Brown‐Schmidt S. Referential form and memory for the discourse history. Cogn Sci. 2021;45(4). doi:10.1111/cogs.12964.
  • Yoon SO, Benjamin AS, Brown-Schmidt S. The historical context in conversation: lexical differentiation and memory for the discourse history. Cognition. 2016;154:102–17. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.011.
  • Zormpa E, Brehm LE, Hoedemaker RS, Meyer AS. The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming. Mem. 2019;27(3):340–52. doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1510966.
  • Gupta Gordon R, Duff MC, Cohen NJ. Applications of collaborative memory: patterns of success and failure in individuals with hippocampal amnesia. In Meade M, Barnier A, Van Bergen P, Harris C, Sutton J (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: theories, research, and applications. Oxford Academic: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2018. Chapter 23. pp. 404–21.
  • Slamecka NJ, Graf P. The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1978;4(6):592–604. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592.
  • MacLeod CM, Gopie N, Hourihan KL, Neary KR, Ozubko JD. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010;36(3):671–85. doi:10.1037/a0018785.
  • Zimmerman J, Brown-Schmidt S. #foodie: implications of interacting with social media for memory. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Apr 16;5(1):16. doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00216-7. PMID: 32300903; PMCID: PMC7162997.
  • Zimmerman J, De Rezende A, Wright AM, Lord KM, Brown-Schmidt S. Cognitive implications of engaging with “fitspiration” content on social media. Collabra: Psychology. 2022;8(1):37458. doi:10.1525/collabra.37458.
  • Vakil E. The effect of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on different aspects of memory: a selective review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27(8):977–1021. doi:10.1080/13803390490919245.
  • Vakil E, Greenstein Y, Weiss I, Shtein S. The effects of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury on Episodic memory: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(3):270–87. doi:10.1007/s11065-019-09413-8.
  • Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(4):519–30. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
  • Murray LL, Ramage AE, Hopper T. Memory impairments in adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2001;22(2):127–36. doi:10.1055/s-2001-13937.
  • DeLuca J, Schultheis MT, Madigan NK, Christodoulou C, Averill A. Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: implications for memory rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(10):1327–33. doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.9390.
  • Lengenfelder J, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. The efficacy of the generation effect in improving new learning in persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(3):290–96. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.290.
  • Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti N, DeLuca J. Pilot study to examine the use of self-generation to improve learning and memory in people with traumatic brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(4):540–46. doi:10.5014/ajot.2010.09020.
  • Duff MC, Morrow E, Edwards M, McCurdy R, Clough S, Nirav P, Walsh K, Covington NV. The value of patient registries to advance basic and translational research in the area of traumatic brain injury. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022;16:846919. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.846919.
  • Salmond CH, Menon DK, Chatfield DA, Pickard JD, Sahakian BJ. Changes over time in cognitive and structural profiles of head injury survivors. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1995–98. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.013.
  • Malec JF, Brown AW, Leibson CL, Flaada JT, Mandrekar JN, Diehl NN, Perkins PK. The mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(9):1417–24. doi:10.1089/neu.2006.0245.
  • Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, Spitz G. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years Post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2997.
  • Rabinowitz AR, Levin HS. Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004.
  • Heaton RK, Akshoomoff N, Tulsky D, Mungas D, Weintraub S, Dikmen S, Beaumont J, Casaletto KB, Conway K, Slotkin J, et al. 2014. Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 20(6). 588–98. 10.1017/S1355617714000241.
  • Shepard RN. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1967;6(1):156–63. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80067-7.
  • Brady TF, Robinson MM, Williams JR, Wixted JT. Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023;30:421–449. doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w.
  • Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 2008;59(4):390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
  • Bates D, Mäachler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Package “lme4”: linear mixed-effects models using ‘eigen’ and s4 [Internet]. 2022. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
  • R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2020 Mar 1]. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Voeten CC Package “buildmer”: stepwise elimination and term reordering for mixed-effects Regression [Internet]. 2022. https://cran.r-project.org/package=buildmer
  • Zhao F, Lim H, Morrow EL, Turkstra LS, Duff MC, Mutlu B. Designing evidence-based support aids for social media access for individuals with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary acceptability study. Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 20;4:991814. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.991814. PMID: 36606124; PMCID: PMC9808081.
  • Brunner M, Togher L, Palmer S, Dann S, Hemsley B. Rehabilitation professionals’ views on social media use in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: gatekeepers to participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(14):1955–64. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1685604.
  • Brunner M, Rietdijk R, Avramovic P, Power E, Miao M, Rushworth N, MacLean L, Brookes AM, Togher L. Developing social-ABI-lity: an online course to support safe use of social media for connection after acquired brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):924–40. doi:10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00099. Epub 2022 Dec 9. PMID: 36492293.
  • Schneider EB, Sur S, Raymont V, Duckworth J, Kowalski RG, Efron DT, Hui X, Selvarajah S, Hambridge HL, Stevens RD, et al. Functional recovery after moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a role for cognitive reserve? Neurol. 2014;82(18):1636–42. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000379.
  • Sumowski JF, Chiaravalloti N, Krch D, Paxton J, DeLuca J. Education attenuates the negative impact of traumatic brain injury on cognitive status. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(12):2562–64. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.023.
  • O’Shea DM, Langer K, Woods AJ, Porges EC, Williamson JB, O’Shea A, Cohen RA. Educational attainment Moderates the Association between Hippocampal Volumes and memory performances in healthy older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:10. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00361.
  • Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  • Coverdale ME, Nairne JS. The mnemonic effect of choice. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019;26(4):1310–16. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01575-z.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.