522
Views
104
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners

Pages 169-190 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • HARTLEY, L. L. and JENSEN, P. J.: Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5: 267–285, 1991.
  • MENTIS, M. and PRUTTING, C. A.: Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30: 88–98, 1987.
  • MCDONALD, S.: Pragmatic skills after closed head injury: ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44: 28–46, 1993.
  • EHRucH, J. and BARRY, P.: Rating communication behaviours in the head-injured adult. Brain Injury, 3: 193–198, 1989.
  • GILES, G. M., FUSSEY, I. and BURGESS, P.: The behavioural treatment of verbal interaction skills following severe head injury: a single case study. Brain Injury, 2: 75–79, 1988.
  • GLOSSER_, G. and DESER, T.: Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40: 67–88, 1990.
  • COELHO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured clients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6: 92–99, 1991.
  • LILES, B. Z., COELHO, C. A., DUFFY, R. J. et al.: Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54: 356–366, 1989.
  • MENTIS, M. and PRUTTING, C. A.: Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head-injured and a normal adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34: 583–595, 1991.
  • COELHO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Discourse analysis with closed head injured adults: evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72: 465–468, 1991.
  • PARSONS, C. L., SNOW, p., COUCH, D. et al.: Conversational skills in closed head injury: Part 1. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 17: 37–46, 1989.
  • MILTON, S. B.: Management of subtle cognitive communication deficits. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3: 1–11, 1988.
  • HARTLEY, L. L.: Assessment of functional communication. In D. E. Tupper and K. D. Cicerone (editors) The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and basic competencies (Kluwer, Boston, MA), pp. 135–168, 1990.
  • KENNEDY, M. R. T., and DERuYTER, F.: Cognitive, and language bases for communication dis-orders. In D. R. Beukelman, and K. M. Yorkston (editors) Communication Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Management of cognitive language and motor impairments (Pro-Ed., Austin, TX), pp. 123–190, 1991.
  • FLANAGAN, S., MCDONALD, S. and TOGHER, L.: Evaluating social skills following traumatic brain injury: the BRISS as a clinical tool. Brain Injury, 9: 321–338, 1995.
  • ADAMOVITCH, B. L. B.: Rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: where are we going? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, September pp. 39–41.
  • MILTON, S. B., PRUTTING, C. A. and BINDER, G. M.: Appraisal of communicative competence in head injured adults. In R. H. Brookshire (editor) Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, MN), pp. 114–123, 1984.
  • PENN, C. and CLEARY, J.: Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients. Brain Injury, 2: 3–17, 1988.
  • ScHLoss, P. J., THOMPSON, C. K., GAJAR, A. H. et al.: Influence of self-monitoring on heterosexual conversational behaviours of head trauma youth. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6: 269–282, 1985.
  • COELHO, C. A.: Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 9: 409–429, 1995.
  • HALLIDAY, M. A. K.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Edward Arnold, London), 1985.
  • SNOW, P., DOUGLAS, J. and PONSFORD, J.: Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology, 9: 365–380, 1995.
  • SILYAST, M.: Aphasia therapy dialogues. Aphasiology, 5: 383–390, 1991.
  • MARSH, N. V. and KNIGHT, R. G.: Behavioural assessment of social competence following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13: 729–740, 1991.
  • BOND, M.: The psychiatry of closed head injury. In N. Brooks (editor) Closed Head Injury: Psychological, social and family consequences (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 148–178, 1984.
  • HAAS, J. F., COPE, D. N. and HALL, K.: Premorbid prevalence of poor premorbid academic performance in severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 50: 52–56, 1987.
  • RIMEL, R. W., JANE, J. A. and BOND, M. R.: Characteristics of the head injured patient. In M. Rosenthal, E. R. Griffin, M. R. Bond et al. (editors) Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury (F. A. Davis, Philadelphia, PA), pp. 8–16, 1990.
  • EHRLICH, J. S.: Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 1–9, 1988.
  • MARTIN, J. R.: English Text. System and Structure (Benjamins, Amsterdam), 1992.
  • TATE, R. L., LULHAM, J. M., BROE, G. A. et al.: Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 52: 1128–1134, 1989.
  • RUSSELL, W. R. and SMITH, A.: Postraumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology, 5: 4–17, 1961.
  • JENNETT, B., TEAsDALE, G., GALBRAITH, S. et al.: Severe head injuries in three countries. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 40: 291–298, 1977.
  • PRUTTING, C. A. and KIRCHNER, D. M.: A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52: 105–119, 1987.
  • THWAITES, A.: Gender differences in Australian English. Unpublished PhD. thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.
  • BERRY, M.: Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approached to exchange structure. In C. Coulthard and M. Montgomery (editors) Studies in Discourse Analysis (Routledge Kegan Paul, London), pp. 120–145, 1981.
  • VENTOLA, E.: The Structure of Social Interaction: a systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters (Pinter, London).
  • POYNTON, C.: Language and Gender: Making the difference (Deakin University Press, Victoria).
  • O'BARR, W. M. and ATKINS, B. K.: Women's language' or 'powerless language'? In B. M. Mayor and A. K. Pugh (editors) Language, Communication and Education (Croom Helm, London), pp. 205–217, 1987.
  • CAMERON, D., MCALINDEN, F. and O'LEARY, K.: Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In J. Coates and D. Cameron (editors) Women in Their Speech Communities (Longman, London), pp. 74–93, 1989.
  • EAIRCLOUGH, N.: Discourse and Social Change (Polity Press, Cambridge), 1992.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.