Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow up study

References

• BROOKS, D. N. and AUGHTON, M. E.: Cognitive recovery during the first year after severe blunt injury. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 1: 166–172,1979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LEVIN, H. S. and EISENBERG, H. M.: Neurobehavioural outcome. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2: 457–472,1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SHALLICE, T. and BURGESS, P. W.: Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114: 727–741,1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BROOKS, D. N., CAMPSIE, L., SYMINGTON, C. et al.: The five-year outcome of severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 49: 767–770, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELSASS, L. and KINSELLA, G.: Social interaction after severe closed head injury. Psychological Medicine, 17: 67–78,1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODDY, M. and HUMPHREY, M.: Social recovery during the year following severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 43: 798–802,1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFFEY, W. J. and ABRAMS, D. L.: Employment outcomes for participants in a brain injury work reentry program: Preliminary findings. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6: 24–34, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• PONSFORD, J. L., OLVER, J. H., CURRAN, C. et al.: Prediction of employment status 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9: 11–20,1995.
   Google Scholar
• BOND, F. and GODFREY, H. P. D.: Conversation with traumatically brain injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11: 319–329,1997.
   Google Scholar
• COEHLO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Discourse analyses with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72: 465–468,1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COEHLO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 5: 381–392,1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• COEHLO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Analysis of conversational discourse in head injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6: 92–99,1991.
   Google Scholar
• HARTLEY, L. L.: Cognitive-Communicative Abilities Following Brain Injury: A Functional Approach (San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• LINSCOTT, R. J., KNIGHT, R. G. and GODFREY, H. P. D.: The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): A measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury, 10: 397–412,1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILTON, S. B. and WERTZ, R. T.: Management of persisting communication deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. In B. P. Uzzell and Y. Gross (editors) Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention (Boston: Martinus-Nijhoff), pp. 223–282,1986.
   Google Scholar
• SNOW, P. and PONSFORD, J.: Assessing and managing impairment of consciousness following TBI. In J. Ponsford, S. Sloan and P. Snow. Traumatic Brain Injury. Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 33–64,1995.
   Google Scholar
• SPENCE, S. E., GODFREY, H. P. D. and KNIGHT, R. G. et al.: First impressions count: A con-trolled investigation of social skill following closed head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32: 309–318,1993.
   Google Scholar
• ALLEN, C. C. and RUFF, R. M.: Self-rating versus neuropsychological performance of moderate versus severe head injured patients. Brain Injury, 4: 7–19,1990.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GOLDSTEIN, G. and McCuE, M.: Differences between patient and informant functional out-come ratings in head-injured individuals. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 1: 25–35,1995.
   Google Scholar
• HANNAY, H. J., EZRACHI, 0. and CONSTANT, C. F. et al.: Outcome measures for patients with head injuries: Report of the Outcome Measures Subcommittee. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 41–50 1996.
   Google Scholar
• PRIGATANO, G.: Patient competency rating. In G. P. Prigatano and others. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 143–151,1986.
   Google Scholar
• WILLER, B., ROSENTHAL, M., KREUTZER, J. et al.: Assessment of community integration follow-ing rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75–87,1993.
   Google Scholar
• BROOKS, D. N., MCKINLAY, W., SYMINGTON, C. et al.: Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Injury, 1: 5–19,1987
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HAGEN, C.: Language disorders secondary to closed head injury: Diagnosis and treatment. Topics in Language Disorders, Sept: 73–87,1981.
   Google Scholar
• HAGEN, C.: Language-cognitive disorganisation following closed head injury: A conceptualiza-tion. In L. E. Trexler (editor) Cognitive Rehabilitation (New York: Plenum Press), pp. 131–151, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• HAGEN, C.: Language disorders in head trauma. In A. Holland (editor) Language Disorders in Adults (San Diego: College-Hill Press), pp. 245–280,1984.
   Google Scholar
• DEPO/vIPEI, R., ZARSKI, J. J. and HALL, D. E.: Cognitive communication impairments: A family-focused viewpoint. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3: 13–22,1988.
   Google Scholar
• HARTLEY, L. L. and GRIFFITH, A.: A functional approach to the cognitive-communication deficits of closed head injured clients. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 13: 51–57,1989.
   Google Scholar
• MILTON, S. B.: Management of subtle cognitive communication deficits. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3: 1–11,1988.
   Google Scholar
• MENTIS, M. and PRUTTING, C. A.: Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30: 88–98,1987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• COEHLO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 9: 471–477,1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARSH, N. V. and KNIGHT, R. G.: Behavioural assessment of social competence following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13: 729–740,1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARSH, N. V. and KNIGHT, R. G.: Relationship between cognitive deficits and social skill after head injury. Neuropsychology, 5: 255–271,1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCDONALD, S. and PEARCE, S.: The 'dice' game: A new test of pragmatic language skills after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 9: 255–271,1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLOAN, S. and PONSFORD, J.: Assessment of cognitive difficulties following TBI. In J. Ponsford, S. Sloan and P. Snow (editors) Traumatic Brain Injury: Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 65–101,1995.
   Google Scholar
• SNOW, P., DOUGLAS, J. and pONSFORD J.: Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury, 11: 409–429,1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNOW, P., DOUGLAS, J. and PONSFORD, J.: Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 11: 947–967,1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMICO, J. S.: Clinical discourse analysis: A functional approach to language assessment. In C. S. Simon (editor) Communication Skills and Classroom Success (London: Taylor & Francis), pp. 165–203,1985.
   Google Scholar
• DA/vIICO, J. S.: Clinical discourse analysis: A functional approach to language assessment. Assessment and therapy methodologies for language and learning disabled students. In C. S. Simon (editor) Communication Skills and Classroom Success (Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications), pp. 125–150,1991.
   Google Scholar
• COHEN, J.: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 155–159,1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCKINLAY, W. W. and BROOKS, D. N.: Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe closed head injury. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6: 87–99,1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRIGATANO, G. P., PARSONS, 0. A. and BoRTz, J. J.: Methodological considerations in clinical neuropsychological research 17 years later. Psychological Assessment, 7: 396–403,1995.
   Google Scholar
• RUFF, R. M. and CA/vIEZULI, L. F.: Research challenges for behavioural rehabilitation. Searching for solutions. In J. S. Kreutzer and P. H. Wehman (editors) Cognitive Rehabilitation for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. A Functional Approach (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes), pp. 23–34,1991.
   Google Scholar
• SHORES, E. A., MAROSSZEKY, J. E., SANDANAM, J. et al.: Preliminary validation of a clinical scale for measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Medical Journal of Australia, 144: 569–572, 1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLANAGAN, S., MCDONALD, S. and TOGHER, L.: Evaluating social skills following traumatic brain injury: The BRISS as a clinical tool. Brain Injury, 9: 321–338,1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TOGHER, L., HAND, L. and CODE, C.: Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury popula-tion: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11: 169–189, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNOW, P., DOUGLAS, J. and PONSFORD, J.: Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology, 9: 365–380,1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BISHARA, S. N., PARTRIDGE, F. M. and GODFREY, H. P. D.: Post-traumatic amnesia and Glasgow Coma Scale related to outcome in survivors in a consecutive series of patients with severe closed head injury. Brain Injury, 6: 373–380,1992.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BROOKS, D. N. and AUGHTON, M. E.: Psychological consequences of blunt head injury. Rehabilitation Medicine, 1: 160–165 1979.
   Google Scholar
• BROOKS, D. N., CAMPSIE, L., SYMINGTON, C. et al.: The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2: 1–13,1987.
   Google Scholar
• PONSFORD, j. L., OLVER, j. H. and CURRAN, C.: A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9: 1–10,1995.
   Google Scholar
• HALL, j. W., HUANG-FU, M. and GENNARELLI, T.: Auditory function in acute severe head injury. Larngoscope, 92: 883–890,1982.
   Google Scholar
• PODOSHIN, L. and FRADIS, M.: Hearing loss after head injury. Archives of Otolarngology, 101: 15–18,1975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SCHUKNECHT, H. F.: Mechanisms of inner ear injury from blows to the head. Annals of Otolarngology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 253–261,1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOND, M.: The psychiatry of closed head injury. In N. Brooks (editor) Closed Head Injury. Psychological, Social and Family Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 148–178, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• BROOKS, N.: Head injury and the family. In N. Brooks (editor) Closed Head Injury. Psychological, Social and Family Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 123–147,1984.
   Google Scholar
• LEVIN, H. S., BENTON, A. and GROSMAN, R.: Neurobehavioural Consequences of Closed Head Injury (New York: Oxford University Press), 1982.
   Google Scholar
• RIMEL, R. W., JANE, j. A. and BOND, M. R.: Characteristics of the head injured patient. In M. Rosenthal, E. R. Griffith, M. R. Bond et al. (editors) Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury (Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Co.), pp. 8–16,1990
   Google Scholar
• ERMA, N. P.: Communication Therapy for Hearing Impaired Adults (Victoria, Australia: Clavis Publishing), 1988.
   Google Scholar
• ERMA, N. P.: Communication and Adult hearing Loss (Victoria, Australia: Clavis Publishing), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION: Guidelines for Screening Hearing Impairments and Middle Ear Disorders. ASHA, 32 (Suppl. 2): 17–24,1990.
   Google Scholar
• BARRIE-BLACKLEY, S., MUSSELWHITE, R. C. and ROGISTER, S. H.: Clinical Oral Language Sampling. A Handbook for Students and Clinicians (Danville, IL: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc), 1978.
   Google Scholar
• GRICE, H. P.: Logic in conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (editors) Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (New York: Academic Press), pp. 41–58,1975.
   Google Scholar
• SPREEN, 0. and BENTON, A.: Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (Victoria, BC: Neuropsychological Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria), 1969.
   Google Scholar
• LEZAK, M. D.: Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd edition) (New York: Oxford University Press), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• RUFF, R. M., LIGHT, R. H., PARKER, S. B. et al.: The psychological construct of word fluency. Brain and Language, 57: 394–405,1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALSH, K. W.: Neuropsychology. A Clinical Approach (2nd edition) (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone), 1987.
   Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. and WOLFSON, D.: The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychological Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• SPREEN, 0. and STRAUSS, E.: A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests (New York: Oxford University Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• REY, A.: L'examen Clinique en Pyschologie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France), 1964.
   Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A., EMSLIE, H. and SMITH, I. N.: The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing Test (Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Co.), 1992.
   Google Scholar
• TROMP, E. and MuLDER, T.: Slowness of information processing after traumatic head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 13: 821–830,1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GODFREY, H. P. D., KNIGHT, R. G., MARSH, N. V. et al.: Social interaction and speed of information processing following very severe closed head injury. Psychological Medicine, 19: 175–182,1989.
   Google Scholar
• WHITENECK, G. G., CHARLIEFUE, M. A., GERHART, K. A. et al.: Quantifying handicap: A new measure of longterm rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: 519–526,1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITENECK, G. G., CHARLIEFUE, M. A., GERHART, K. A. et al.: Guide for use of the CHART (Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital), 1992.
   Google Scholar
• WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO): International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A Manual for Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease (Geneva: Switzerland: WHO), 1980.
   Google Scholar
• WHITENECK, G. G.: Scoring Guidelines for the Revised CHART. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• RAPPAPORT, M., HALL, K. M., HOPKINS, K. et al.: Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63: 118–123,1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JENNETT, B. and BOND, M. R.: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet, 1: 480–487,1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOAKE, C. and HIGH, W.: Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury: Unidirnensional or multidimensional? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: 1–9,1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEPPELL, G.: Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (3rd edition) (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• JORDAN, F. M. and MURDOCH, B. E.: A comparison of the conversational skills of closed head injured children and normal children. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 18: 69–82,1990.
   Google Scholar
• McDoNALD, S.: Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informa-tional needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44: 28–46,1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COEHLO, C. A.,LILES, B. Z., DUFFY, R.J. et al.: Conversational patterns of aphasic, closed head injured, and normal speakers. In M. Lemme (editor), Clinical Aphasiology, 21: (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed), pp. 183–192,1993.
   Google Scholar
• BURNS, S., KAPPENBERG, R., MCKENN A. et al.: Personality, psychopathology, and neuro-pathology. Brain Injury, 8: 413–427,1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GODFREY, H. P. D., PARTRIDGE, F. M., KNIGHT, R. G. et al.: Course of insight disorder and emotional dysfunction following closed head injury: A controlled cross-sectional follow-up study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 15: 503–515,1993.
   Google Scholar
• KINSELLA, G., MORAN, C., FORD, B. et al.: Emotional disorder and its assessment within the severe head injured population. Psychological Medicine, 18: 57–63,1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OLVER, J. H., PONSFORD, J. J. and CURRAN, C.: Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury, 10: 841–848,1996.
   Google Scholar
• TYERMAN, A. and HUMPHREY, M.: Changes in self-concept following severe head injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7: 11–23,1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIELIAUSKAS, L. A.: Depressed or not depressed? That is the question. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 15: 119–134,1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAVISON, G. and NEALE, J.: Abnormal Psychology. An Experimental Approach (6th edition) (New York: Wiley), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• PRIGATANO, G. P.: Recovery and cognitive retraining after craniocerebral trauma. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20: 603–613,1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SBORDONE, R. J.: Overcoming obstacles in cognitive rehabilitation. In J. S. Kreutzer and P. H. Wehman (editors) Cognitive Rehabilitation for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. A Functional Approach (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes), pp. 105–116,1991.
   Google Scholar
• PRUTTING, C. A. and KIRCHNER, D. M.: A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52: 105–119,1987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YLVISAKER, M. and HOLLAND, A. L.: Coaching, self-coaching, and rehabilitation of head injury. In D. F. Johns (editor) Clinical Management of Neurogenic Communicative Disorders (Boston: Little, Brown & Co.), pp. 243–257,1985.
   Google Scholar
• BELLACK, A. S.: Recurrent problems in the behavioural assessment of social skill. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21: 29–41,1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADAMS, J. H., MITCHELL, D. E., GRAHAM, D. I. et al.: Diffuse brain damage of immediate impact type. Its relationship to 'primary brainstem damage' in head injury. Brain, 100: 489–502, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• PONSFORD, J.: Mechanisms, recovery, and sequelae of traumatic brain injury. In J. Ponsford, S. Sloan and P. Snow (editors) Traumatic Brain Injury. Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 1–31,1995.
   Google Scholar
• PANG, D.: Pathophysiologic correlates of neurobehavioural syndromes following closed head injury. In M. Ylvisaker (editor) Head Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adults (Boston: College-Hill), pp. 3–70,1985.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LANCKNER, D.: Rags to riches: Our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communi-cative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language, 57: 1–11, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, C. V., BIGLER, E. D. and BLATTER, D. D.: Frontal lobe lesions, diffuse damage, and neuropsychological functioning in traumatic brain injured patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 17: 900–908,1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOWDEN, S. C. and SMITH, L. C.: What does the Austin Maze measure? Australian Psychologist, Mar: 34–37,1994.
   Google Scholar
• CANAVAN, A. G. M., JANOTA, I. and SCHURR, P. H.: Luria's frontal lobe syndrome: Psychological and anatomical considerations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48: 1049–1053,1985.
   Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. M. and WOLFSON, D. A.: A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes. Neuropsychological Review, 4: 161–198, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. M. and WOLFSON, D. A.: Category test and Trail Making test as measures of frontal lobe function. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9: 50–56,1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEPPING, M. and ROTIECHE, J. R.: Psychosocial consequences of significant brain injury. In D. E. Tupper and K. D. Cicerone (editors) The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Issues in Development and Rehabilitation(Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 215–256,1991.
   Google Scholar
• ARMSTRONG, E.: Cohesive harmony in aphasic discourse and its significance to listener percep-tion of coherence. In R. H. Brookshire (editor) Clinical Aphasiology, 17: (Minneapolis: BRK Publishers), pp. 210–215,1987.
   Google Scholar
• DOYLE, p. J., TSIRONAS, D., GODA, A. J. et al.: The relationship between objective measures and listeners' judgements of the communicative informativeness of the connected discourse of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5: 53–60,1996.
   Google Scholar
• BODY, R. and PERKINS, M.: Listener perceptions and linguistic measure in head injured narra-tive. In J. Ponsford, P. Snow and V. Anderson (editors) International Perspectives on Traumatic Brain Injury: Proceedings of the Fifth International Association for the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury Conference, Melbourne, Australia, November 1996 (Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press), pp. 221–225,1996.
   Google Scholar