Intonation unit analysis of conversational discourse in closed head injury

References

• MCDONALD, S.: Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to com-prehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13: 295–312,1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRIGATANO, G. P., RouEcHE, J. R. and FORDYCE, D. J.: Nonaphasic language disturbances in closed head injury. Language Sciences, 7: 217–229,1985.
   Google Scholar
• MILTON, S. B., PRUTTING, C. A. and BINDER, G. M.: Appraisal of communicative competence in head injured adults. In R. H. Brookshire (editor) Clinical Aphasiology conference proceedings (Minneapolis: BRK), pp. 114–123,1984.
   Google Scholar
• MILTON, S. B.: Management of subtle cognitive communication deficits. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3: 1–11,1988.
   Google Scholar
• GA1AR, A., ScHioss, p. J., scHLoss, C. N. et al.: Effects of feedback and self-monitoring on head trauma youths' conversation skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17: 353–358,1984.
   Google Scholar
• GILES, G. M., FUSSEY, I. and BURGRESS, P.: The behavioral treatment of verbal interaction skills following severe head injury: A single case study. Brain Injury, 2: 75–79,1988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SNOW, P.,DOUGLAS,J. and PONSFORD J.: Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology, 9: 365–380, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• TOGHER, L., HAND, L. and CODE, C.: Analyzing discourse in the traumatic brain injury popula-tion: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11: 169–189, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COELHO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R. J.: Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6: 92–99,1991a.
   Google Scholar
• MENTIS, M. and PRUTTING, C. A.: Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head-injured and a normal adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34: 583–595,1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CHAFE, W.: Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (editor) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 11 (Philadelphia: John Benjarrtins), pp. 21–51,1987.
   Google Scholar
• CHAFE, W.: Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• HALLIDAY, M. A. K.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar (London: Edward Arnold), 1985.
   Google Scholar
• KERTESZ, A.: Western Aphasia Battery (New York: Grune & Stratton ), 1982.
   Google Scholar
• HAGEN, C., MALKMUS, D. and DURHAM, P.: Levels of cognitive functioning. In: rehabilitation of the head-injured adult: Comprehensive management (Downet, CA: Professional Staff Association of Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Inc.), pp. 8–11,1980.
   Google Scholar
• LEVIN, H. S., O DONNEL, V. M. and GROSSMAN, R. G.: The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test: A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167: 675–684,1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATTIS, S.: Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. In L. Bellak and B. Karasu (editors) Geriatric Psychiatry (New York: Grune & Stratton), pp. 148–159, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• HOLLINGSHEAD, A. B.: Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, Department of Sociology, New Haven, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• BOLES, L., HOLLAND, A. L. and BEESON, P.: Conversation analysis: How much talk is enough? Miniseminar presented at the annual convention of the American Speech and Language Association, Anaheim, CA, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• CRUTTENDEN, A.: Intonation (New York: Cambridge University Press), 1986.
   Google Scholar
• BRINTON, B. and FUJIKI, M.: Development of topic manipulation skills in discourse. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27: 350–358,1984.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MENTIS, M. and PRUTTING, C. A.: Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30: 88–98,1987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• COELHO, C. A.: Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: A critical review of the recent literature. Aphasiology, 9: 409–429,1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALEXANDER, M. P., BENSON, D. F. and STUSS, D. T.: Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language, 37: 656–691,1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UZZELL, B. P., DOLINSKAS, L. A. and LANGFIT T. W.: Visual field deficits in relation to head injury severity. Archives of Neurology, 45: 420–424,1989.
   Google Scholar
• PANG, D.: Pathophysiologic correlates of neurobehavioral syndromes following closed head injury. In M. Ylvisaker (editor) Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed), pp. 3–70,1985.
   Google Scholar
• GENNARELLI, T. A., THIBAULT, L. E., ADAMS, J. H. et al.: Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Annals of Neurology, 12: 564–574,1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARTLEY, L. L.: Cognitive-Communicative Abilities Following Brain Injury (San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• COELHO, C. A., LILES, B. Z. and DUFFY, R.J.: Discourse analysis with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72: 465–468,1991b.
   Google Scholar