References
- Awan S. N. Analysis of nasalance: nasalvie. Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, W Ziegler, K Deger. Whurr‐Publishers, London 1998; 518–525, In
- Bressmann T., Sader R., Awan S. N., Busch R., Zeilhofer H. F., Brockmeier J., Horch H. H. Nasalanzmessung mit dem NasalView bei der Therapiekontrolle von Patienten mit Lippen‐Kiefer‐Gaumenspalten. Sprache ‐ Stimme ‐ Gehör 1998; 22: 98–106
- Bressmann T., Sader R., Whitehill T. L., Awan S. N., Zeilhofer H. F., Horch H. H. Nasalance distance and nasalance ratio: two new measures. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 2000; 37: 248–256
- Dalston R., Warren D. W., Dalston E. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1991; 28: 184–188
- Dalston R. M., Seaver E. J. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1992; 29: 17–21
- Dalston R. M., Neiman G., Gonzalez‐Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross dialect and cross culture study. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1993; 30: 285–291
- Fletcher S. Diagnosing speech disorders from cleft palate. Grune & Stratton, New York 1978
- Hardin M., Van Denmark D., Morris H., Payne M. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgements of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate 1992; 29: 346–351
- Karnell M. P. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1995; 32: 145–148
- Keuning K. H. D. M., Wieneke G. H., Dejonckere P. H. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica 2004; 56: 157–164
- Lewis K. E., Watterson T., Quint T. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 2000; 37: 584–589
- Lewis K. E., Watterson T. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the nasometer and the NasalView. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 2003; 40: 40–45
- Litzaw L. L., Dalston R. M. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. Journal of Communication Disorders 1992; 25: 55–64
- Pallier C. 2002. Shuffle: a program to randomize lists with optional sequential constraints, accessed 28 August 2003, available at: http://www.pallier.org/ressources/shuffle/shuffle.pdf
- Sell D., Harding A., Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 17–33
- Swennen G. R. J., Grimaldi H., Upheber J., Kramer F. J., Dempf R. Nasalance measures in German‐speaking cleft patients. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2004; 15: 158–164
- Watterson T., Lewis K., Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1998; 35: 293–298
- Watterson T., Lewis K. E., Foley‐Homan N. Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1999; 36: 243–247