Aspects of spatio‐temporal variability during consonant production by Greek speakers with hearing impairment

References

• Baum S. R., Waldstein R. S. Perseveratory coarticulation in the speech of profoundly hearing‐impaired and normally hearing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1286–1292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Nickerson R., Stevens K. Temporal patterns in the speech of the deaf – a study in remedial training. Clarke School for the Deaf, Northampton, MA 1974
   Google Scholar
• Calvert D. R. Some acoustic characteristics of the speech of profoundly deaf individuals, unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA. 1961
   Google Scholar
• Crawford R. Teaching voiced velar stops to profoundly deaf children using EPG: two case studies. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1995; 9: 255–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais P. A., Critz‐Crosby P. Consonant lingual‐palatal contacts produced by normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1423–1435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farnetani E., Provaglio A. Assessing variability of lingual consonants in Italian. Quaderni del Centro di Studio per le Ricerche di Fonetica del CNR 1991; X: 117–145
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher S. New prospects for speech by the hearing impaired. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice, N. J Lass. Academic Press, New York 1983; 1–41, Volume 9
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher S., Dagenais P., Critz‐Crosby P. Teaching consonants to profoundly hearing‐impaired speakers using palatometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 929–942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbon F., Nicolaidis K. Palatography. Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, W. J Hardcastle, N Hewlett. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999; 229–245
   Google Scholar
• Goehl H., Kaufman D. Do the effects of adventitious deafness include disordered speech?. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1984; 49: 58–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardcastle W., Jones W., Knight C., Trudgeon A., Calder G. New developments in electropalatography: a state‐of‐the‐art report. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1989; 3: 1–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde R. A. Instantaneous visual feedback in speech training for the deaf. 1973, Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, November 1973
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Numbers F. C. An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Genetic Psychology Monographs 1942; 25: 289–392
   Google Scholar
• John J. E. J., Howarth J. N. The effect of time distortions on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech. Language and Speech 1965; 8: 127–134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane H., Webster J. Speech deterioration in post‐lingually deafened adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991; 89: 859–865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindau M. The story of /r/. Phonetic Linguistics. Essays in honour of P. Ladefoged, V. A Fromkin. Academic Press, New York 1985; 157–167
   Google Scholar
• Maassen B., Povel D.‐J. The effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility of deaf speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985; 78: 877–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides A. The speech of deaf and partially hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1970; 5: 126–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGarr N. S., Harris K. Articulatory control in a deaf speaker. Speech of the Hearing‐Impaired: Research, Training and Personnel Preparation, I Hochberg, H Levitt, M. J Osberger. University Park, Baltimore, MD 1983
   Google Scholar
• McGarr N. S., Lofqvist A. Obstruent production by hearing‐impaired speakers: interarticulator timing and acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1982; 72: 34–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr N. S., Osberger M. J. Pitch deviancy and intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders 1978; 11: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod S., Searl J. Adaptation to an electropalatograph palate: Acoustic, impressionistic, and perceptual data. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2006; 15: 192–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen R. B. Durational aspects of vowel production in the speech of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1974; 17: 386–398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen R. B. Second formant transitions of selected consonant‐vowel combinations in the speech of deaf and normal‐hearing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1976a; 19: 279–289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen R. B. The production of English stop consonants in the speech of deaf children. Journal of Phonetics 1976b; 4: 29–41
   Google Scholar
• Monsen R. B. Toward measuring how well hearing‐impaired children speak. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1978; 21: 197–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen R. B., Leiter E. Comparison of intelligibility with duration and pitch control in the speech of deaf children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1975; 57: 569 (A)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis K. Sources of articulatory variability in Greek: an electropalatographic study, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis K. An electropalatographic study of Greek spontaneous speech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2001; 31: 67–85
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis K. Articulatory variability during consonant production by Greek speakers with hearing impairment: an electropalatographic study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2004; 18: 419–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okalidou A., Harris K. S. A comparison of intergestural patterns in deaf and hearing adult speakers: implications from an acoustic analysis of disyllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999; 106: 394–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M. J., Levitt H. The effect of timing errors on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979; 66: 1316–1324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M. J., McGarr N. Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice, N. J Lass. Academic Press, New York 1982; 221–283
   Google Scholar
• Recasens D. Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in Catalan CV sequences. Language and Speech 1985; 28: 97–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recasens D. Lingual Coarticulation. Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, W. J Hardcastle, N Hewlett. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999; 80–104
   Google Scholar
• Recasens D. The articulatory characteristics of palatal consonants. Journal of Phonetics 1999; 18: 267–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recasens D., Pallarès M. D. A study of /▒/ and /r/ in the light of the “DAC” coarticulation model. Journal of Phonetics 1999; 27: 143–169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recasens D., Farnetani E., Fontdevila J., Pallarès M. D. An electropalatographic study of alveolar and palatal consonants in Catalan and Italian. Language and Speech 1993; 36: 213–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb M. P., Pang‐Ching G. K. Relative timing characteristics of hearing‐impaired speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992; 91: 2954–2960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman H. A spectrographic investigation of consonant‐vowel transitions in the speech of deaf adults. Journal of Phonetics 1976; 4: 129–136
   Google Scholar
• Ryalls J., Baum S., Samuel R., Larouche A., Lacoursière N., Garceau J. Anticipatory co‐articulation in the speech of hearing‐impaired French Canadians. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1993; 28: 87–101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryalls J., Larouche A., Giroux F. Acoustic comparison of CV syllables in French‐speaking children with normal hearing, moderate‐to‐severe and profound hearing impairment. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 2003; 1: 99–114
   Google Scholar
• Smith C. R. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1975; 18: 795–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stathopoulos E., Duchan J., Sonnenmeier R., Bruce N. Intonation and pausing in deaf speech. Folia Phoniatrica 1986; 38: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldstein R. S., Baum S. R. Anticipatory coarticulation in the speech of profoundly hearing‐impaired and normally hearing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1276–1285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead R. L., Jones K. O. The effect of vowel environment on duration of consonants produced by normal‐hearing, hearing‐impaired and deaf adult speakers. Journal of Phonetics 1978; 6: 77–81
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman G., Collins M. The speech of the adventitiously deaf and auditory information.: A response to Goehl and Kaufman (1984). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1985; 50: 220–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar