Non‐word repetition: An investigation of phonological complexity in children with Grammatical SLI

References

• Bishop D. V. M. Test of Reception of Grammar (TROG). Manchester University, Manchester 1983
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M. Uncommon understanding: Comprehension in specific language impairment. Psychology Press, Hove 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M., Bright P., James C., van der Lely H. K. J. Grammatical SLI: A distinct subtype of developmental language impairment?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2000; 21: 159–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M., North T., Donlan C. Non‐word repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 1996; 37: 391–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini U., Leonard L. B. Phonology and children with specific language impairment: Status of structural constraints in two languages. Journal of Communication Disorders 2000; 33: 131–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botting N., Conti‐Ramsden G. Non‐word repetition and language development in children with specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 421–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiat S. Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001; 16: 113–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth K. The prosodic structure of early words. Signal to Syntax, J. L Morgan, K Demuth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1996; 171–184
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan C. A., Biber M. E., Campbell T. F. Lexical influences on non‐word repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics 1995; 16: 211–222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L. M., Dunn L. M., Whetton C., Pintilie D. The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. NFER‐Nelson, Windsor 1982
   Google Scholar
• Echols C. H. A perceptually‐based model of children's earliest productions. Cognition 1993; 46: 245–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echols C. H., Newport E. L. The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 1992; 2: 189–220
   Google Scholar
• Edwards J., Lahey M. Non‐word repetitions of children with specific language impairment: Exploration of some explanations for their inaccuracies. Applied Psycholinguistics 1998; 19: 279–309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott C., Murray D., Pearson L. British Ability Scales. NFER‐Nelson, Windsor 1978
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann N., Novogrodsky R. The acquisition of Relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 2004; 31: 661–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardener H., Froud K., McClelland A., van der Lely H. K. J. The development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language difficulties in young children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2006; 41: 513–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S. E., Baddeley A. D. Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language 1989; 28: 200–213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S. E., Baddeley A. D. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?. Journal of Memory and Language 1990; 29: 336–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S. E., Baddeley A. D. Children's test of non‐word repetition. The Psychological Corporation, Oxford 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole S. E., Willis C. S., Emslie H., Baddeley A. D. Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 1992; 28: 887–898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S. E., Willis C., Emslie H., Baddeley A. D. The influence of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children's repetitions of non‐words. Applied Psycholinguistics 1991; 12: 349–367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken L. Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language 1996; 72: 683–712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman L. Prosodic influences on speech production in children with specific language impairment and speech deficits: Kinematic, acoustic and transcription evidence. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 1499–1517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. English Sound Structure. Blackwell, Oxford 1994
   Google Scholar
• Ingram D. Procedures for the phonological analysis of children's language. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1981
   Google Scholar
• Joanisse M. F., Seidenberg M. S. Specific language impairment: a deficit in grammar or processing?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998; 2((7))240–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk S. A., McCarthy J. J., Kirk W. D. Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. University of Illinois Press, Urban, IL 1968
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L. Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Marcus G., Fisher S. E. FOXP2 in focus: What can genes tell us about speech and language?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003; 7((6))257–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall C., Ebbels S., Harris J., van der Lely H. K. J. Investigating the impact of prosodic complexity on the speech of children with specific language impairment. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 2002; 14: 43–66
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J., Prince A. Prosodic Morphology. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, J Goldsmith. Blackwell, Oxford 1995; 318–366
   Google Scholar
• McClelland J. L., Patterson K. Rules or connections in past‐tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002; 6((11))465–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery J. W. Examination of phonological working memory in specifically language‐impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics 1995; 16: 355–378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury C., Bishop D., Briscoe J. Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2002; 23: 247–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara M., Johnson J. Syntactic bootstrapping in children with specific language impairment. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997; 32: 189–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orsolini M., Sechi E., Maronato C., Bonvino E., Corcelli A. Nature of phonological delay in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 63–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiris D. 2000, The influences of prosodic complexity on segmental production in SLI: A single case study, MSc thesis, University College London, London
   Google Scholar
• Pinker S. Rules of Language. Science 1991; 253((5019))530–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus F. Talk of two theories. Nature 2001; 412((6845))393–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven J. C., Court J., Raven J. The Progressive Matrices. Lewis, London 1978
   Google Scholar
• Roy P., Chiat S. A prosodically controlled word and non‐word repetition task for 2‐ to 4‐year‐olds: Evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2004; 47((1))223–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlen B., Reuterskioeld‐Wagner C., Nettelbladt U., Radeborg K. Non‐word repetition in children with language impairment—pitfalls and possibilities. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 337–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk E. O. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 1980; 11: 563–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk E. O. The Syntax of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Snowling M., Chiat S., Hulme C. Words, non‐words and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie and Baddeley. Applied Psycholinguistics 1991; 12: 369–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakaki S. Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language 2001; 77: 419–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakaki S. Sentence comprehension in Greek SLI children. Investigations in Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, F Windsor, L Kelly, N Hewlett. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 2002; 57–72, Chapter 5
   Google Scholar
• Tallal P. Experimental studies of language learning impairments: From research to remediation. Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome, D Bishop, L Leonard. Psychological press, Hove 2000
   Google Scholar
• The SLI Consortium. A Genome wide Scan Identifies Two Novel Loci Involved in SLI. American Journal of Human Genetics 2002; 70: 384–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua 1996a; 98: 243–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. The Test of Active and Passive Sentences (TAPS). 1996b, Available from author, Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Advanced Syntactic Test of Pronominal Reference (A‐STOP). 1997, Available from author, Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Verb Agreement and Tense Test (VATT). 2000, Available from author, Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J. Domain‐specific cognitive systems: Insight from Grammatical‐specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005; 9((2))53–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Harris J. Test of Phonological Structures (TOPhS). 1999, Available from authors, Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Howard D. Children with specific language impairment: Linguistic impairment or short‐term memory deficit?. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 1193–1207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Stollwerck L. A grammatical specific language impairment in children: An autosomal dominant inheritance?. Brain and Language 1996; 52: 484–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Rosen S., Adlard A. Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains. Relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition 2004; 94: 167–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar