Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism

References

• Auer P. On the prosody and syntax of turn‐continuations. Prosody in Conversation, E Couper‐Kuhlen, M Selting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996; 57–100
   Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Cooper F., Best W., Edwards S., Maxim J. The evaluation of a novel conversation‐focused therapy for agrammatism. 2008, Stroke Association Project Grant TSA 2007/05. Available online at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/conversation‐therapy, accessed on 20 October 2008
   Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Grammar without sentence structure: a conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 2007a; 21: 256–282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2007b; 42: 629–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt R. S. Sentence processing in aphasia. Acquired Aphasia, M. T Sarno. Academic Press, San Diego 1998; 229–267, 3rd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt P. M. Aspects phonetiques et phonologiques du systeme intonatif chez deux sujets atteints d'aphasie non fluente severe. Langues et Linguistique 1987; 13: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Cooper W. E., Klouda G. Intonation in aphasic and right‐hemisphere‐damaged patients. Phonetic Approaches to Speech Production in Aphasia and Related Disorders, J Ryalls. College‐Hill, Boston, MA 1987; 59–77
   Google Scholar
• Corrin J., Tarplee C., Wells B. Interactional linguistics and language development: a conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntax. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, M Selting, E Couper‐Kuhlen. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2001; 199–225
   Google Scholar
• Couper‐Kuhlen E., Ford C. E. Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross‐linguistic Studies from Conversation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2004
   Google Scholar
• Couper‐Kuhlen E., Selting M. Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996a
   Google Scholar
• Couper‐Kuhlen E., Selting M. Towards and interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. Prosody in Conversation, E Couper‐Kuhlen, M Selting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996b; 11–56
   Google Scholar
• Danly M., Shapiro B. Speech prosody in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language 1982; 16: 171–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danly M., de Villiers J., Cooper W. The control of speech prosody in Broca’s aphasia. Speech Communication Papers, J Wolf, D Klatt. Acoustical Society of America, New York 1979; 68
   Google Scholar
• Ford C. E., Thompson S. A. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. Interaction and Grammar, E Ochs, E. A Schegloff, S. A Thompson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996; 134–184
   Google Scholar
• Ford C. E., Fox B. A., Thompson S. A. Practices in the construction of turns: the ‘TCU’ revisited. Pragmatics 1996; 6: 427–454
   Google Scholar
• Gandour J., Petty S. H., Dardarananda R. Dysprosody in Broca’s aphasia: a case study. Brain and Language 1989; 37: 232–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1972, 1st ed
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Fodor I. G., Schulhoff C. Prosodic factors in grammar—evidence from aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1967; 10: 5–20
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Kaplan E., Barresi B. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001, 3rd ed
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, G Psathas. Irvington, New York 1979; 97–121
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Co‐constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1995; 28: 233–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C., Goodwin M. H. Assessments and the construction of context. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A Duranti, C Goodwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992; 147–189
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C., Goodwin M. H., Olsher D. Producing sense with nonsense syllables: turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. The Language of Turn and Sequence, C. E Ford, B. A Fox, S. A Thompson. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002; 56–80
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. A change‐of‐state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; 299–345
   Google Scholar
• Keenan E. O., Schieffelin B. Foregrounding referents: a reconsideration of left‐dislocation in discourse. Acquiring Conversational Competence, E. O Keenan, B Schieffelin. Routledge, London 1983; 158–174
   Google Scholar
• Kim K.‐H. WH‐clefts and left‐dislocation in English conversation: cases of topicalization. Word Order in Discourse, P Downing, M Noonan. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1995; 247–296
   Google Scholar
• Lind M. The use of prosody in interaction: observations from a case study of a Norwegian speaker with a non‐fluent type of aphasia. Investigations in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, F Windsor, M. L Kelly, N Hewlett. Lawrence Erlbaum, London 2002; 373–389
   Google Scholar
• Local J. K., Kelly J., Wells W. H. G. Towards a phonology of conversation: turn‐taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics 1986; 22: 411–437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock S., Wilkinson R., Bryan K. Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation (SPPARC): A Resource Pack. Speechmark, BicesterUK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J. Assessment and treatment of sentence processing disorders: a review of the literature. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders: Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation, A. E Hillis. Psychology Press, New York 2002; 351–372
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland H., Huiskes M. Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: its use as a resumption marker. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, M Selting, E Couper‐Kuhlen. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2001; 141–169
   Google Scholar
• Niemi J. Modularity of prosody: autonomy of phonological quantity and intonation in aphasia. Brain and Language 1998; 61: 45–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger M., Damico J. Spontaneous verbal repetition: A social strategy in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 971–988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks H., Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn‐taking for conversation. Language 1974; 50: 696–735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. Reflections on studying prosody in talk‐in‐interaction. Language and Speech 1998; 41: 235–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. Sequence Organisation in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007
   Google Scholar
• Seddoh S. A. Prosodic disturbance in aphasia: speech timing versus intonation production. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2004; 18: 17–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting M. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn‐constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 1996; 6: 357–388
   Google Scholar
• Selting M. Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn‐constructional units in conversation. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, A Hakulinen, M Selting. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2005; 17–44
   Google Scholar
• Streeck J. Gesture as communication 1: its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 1993; 60: 275–299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar