356
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales

, &
Pages 56-79 | Received 07 Apr 2016, Accepted 03 Sep 2016, Published online: 13 Oct 2016

References

  • Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
  • Bernstein, S., Todd, A., & Edwards, J. (2013). How do adults perceive the speech of children with cochlear implants? Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Chicago, IL, 14–16 November.
  • Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
  • Carney, A.E., Widin, G., & Viemeister, N. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.
  • Chandrasekaran, B., Yi, H.-G., Smayda, K.E., & Maddox, W.T. (2016). Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 566–582.
  • Chung, H., Kong, E., Edwards, J., Weismer, G., Fourakis, M., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Cross-linguistic studies of children’s and adults’ vowel spaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 442–454.
  • Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., & Jacobs, R. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic cues. Cognition, 108, 804–809.
  • Edwards, J., & Beckman, M.E. (2008). Methodological questions in studying consonant acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 937–956.
  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A.E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611–631.
  • Francis, A., Kaganovich, N., & Driscoll-Huber, C. (2008). Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society, 124, 1234–1251.
  • Gibbon, F. (1999). Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 382–397.
  • Gordon, P., Eberhardt, J., & Rueckl, J. (1993). Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 1–42.
  • Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another. Language and Speech, 53, 447–471.
  • Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 377–396.
  • Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. (2014). Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1009–1021.
  • Janson, T., & Schulman, R. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 321–336
  • Johnson, K., Strand, E., & D’Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 359–384.
  • Jongman, A., Wayland, R., and Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252–1263.
  • Julien, H., & Munson, B. (2012). Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1836–1849.
  • Kapnoula, E., McMurray, B., & Edwards, J. (2015). Gradient Categorization of Speech Sounds Helps Listeners Recover from Lexical Garden Paths. Poster presented at the 14th Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Action Meeting, November 19, Chicago, IL.
  • Kent, R. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 7–23.
  • Kong, E., Edwards, J. (2011). Individual differences in speech perception: Evidence from visual analogue scaling and eye-tracking. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1126–1129.
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P, & Christensen, R. (2015). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTes
  • Li, F. (2012). Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: A cross linguistic acoustic study. Child Development, 83, 1303–1315.
  • Li, F., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M.E. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 111–124.
  • Li, F., Munson, B., Edwards, J., Yoneyama, K., & Hall, K. (2011). Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: Implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 999–1011.
  • Macken, M., & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7, 41–74.
  • Manis, F.R., McBride-Chang, C., Seidenberg, M.S., Keating, P., Doi, L.M., Munson, B., & Peterson, A. (1997). Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 211–235.
  • Massaro, D., & Cohen, M. (1983). Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test. Speech Communication, 2, 15–35.
  • McAllister Byun, T., Halpin, P., & Harel, D. (2015). Crowdsourcing for gradient ratings of child speech: Comparing three methods of response aggregation. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4. Paper retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0935.pdf on March 17, 2016.
  • McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., & Spivey, M. (2003). Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 77–97.
  • Miller, J. (1994). On the internal structure of phonetic categories: A progress report. Cognition, 50, 271–285.
  • Munson, B. (2007). The acoustic correlates of perceived sexual orientation, perceived masculinity, and perceived femininity. Language and Speech, 50, 125–142.
  • Munson, B. (2011). The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 2631–2634.
  • Munson, B., & Baylis, A. (2007). Gender Typicality in the Speech of Children with Phonological Disorder. Poster Presentation at the Symposium for Research on Child.
  • Munson, B., & Brinkman, K.N. (2004). The effect of multiple presentations on judgments of children’s speech production accuracy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 341–354.
  • Munson, B., & Coyne, A. (2010). The influence of apparent vocal-tract size, contrast type, and implied sources of variation on the perception of American English voiceless lingual fricatives. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 14, 48–59.
  • Munson, B., Crocker, L., Pierrehumbert, J., Owen-Anderson, A., & Zucker, K. (2015). Gender typicality in children’s speech: A comparison of the speech of boys with and without gender identity disorder. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 1995–2003.
  • Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S.K., Beckman, M.E., & Meyer, M.K. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of Vox Humana. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24, 245–260.
  • Munson, B., Johnson, J., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison of speech-language pathologists with clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 124–139.
  • Perry, T.L., Ohde, R., & Ashmead, D. (2001). The acoustic bases for gender identification from children's voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2988–2998.
  • Pitt, M., & Samuel, A. (1990). Attention allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611–632.
  • Revai, D. (2016). Production of stop contrasts in children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Undergraduate honor’s thesis, UW-Madison, available at learningtotalk.org.
  • Rvachew, S., & Jamieson, D. (1989). Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 193–208.
  • Schellinger, S.K., Munson, B., & Edwards, J. (2016). Gradient perception of children’s productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1205665
  • Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (2001). Transcribing the speech of young children. Topics in Language Disorders, 21, 12–21.
  • Strömbergsson, S., Salvi, G., & House, D. (2015). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/and /k/in typical and misarticulated children’s speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 3422–3435.
  • Todd, A.E., Edwards, J.R., & Litovsky, R.Y. (2011). Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 3969–3979.
  • Toscano, J., McMurray, B., Dennhardt, J., & Luck, S. (2010). Continuous perception and graded categorization: Electrophysiological evidence for a graded relationship between the acoustic signal and perceptual encoding of speech. Psychological Science, 21, 1532–1540.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.