Can listeners hear the difference between children with normal hearing and children with a hearing impairment?

References

• Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N., Dhooge, I., D’haeseleer, E., & Van Lierde, K. (2010). A comparison of the consonant production between Dutch children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(4), 416–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N., Van Lierde, K., D’haeseleer, E., & Dhooge, I. (2015). Nasalance and nasality in children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79(4), 541–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N., Van Lierde, K., Dhooge, I., & Corthals, P. (2011). A comparison of vowel productions in prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants, severe hearing-impaired children using conventional hearing aids and normal-hearing children. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 63(3), 154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1980). Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13(1), 33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, S. V., & Assmann, P. F. (2013). Vowel production in children with cochlear implants: Implications for evaluating disordered speech. The Volta Review, 113(2), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3). Retrieved from www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M. E. G., Le Normand, M. T., & Cohen, H. (2007). Production of consonants by prelinguistically deaf children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(11–12), 875–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, S. B., Tsai, P. L., & Gao, S. (2003). Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(4), 440–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, D. J. (2007). Speech intelligibility in young cochlear implant recipients: Gains during year three. The Volta Review, 107(2), 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, H.-Y., Ko, H.-C., Wang, N.-M., Fang, T.-J., Chao, W.-C., Tsou, Y.-T., & Wu, C.-M. (2014). Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(5), 799–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen, P. (1995). Speaker-listener familiarity: Parents as judges of delayed speech intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28(1), 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2013). Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 643–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis, S. (2017). Speech and language in congenitally deaf children with a cochlear implant. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 763–790). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hide, Ø. (2013). Acoustic features of speech by young cochlear implant users. A comparison with normal-hearing and hearing-aided age mates. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimacka, L., Patterson, A., & Patterson, R. (2001). Listening to deaf speech: Does experience count? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, J., & Trudgill, P. (1979). Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liker, M., Mildner, V., & Sindija, B. (2007). Acoustic analysis of the speech of children with cochlear implants: A longitudinal study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(1), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr, N. S. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26(3), 451–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munson, B., Johnson, J. M., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 124–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis, K., & Sfakianaki, A. (2007). An acoustic analysis of vowels produced by Greek speakers with hearing impairment. Proceedings of XVI International Congress of Phonetic Sciences(pp. 1969–1972). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.
   Google Scholar
• Osberger, M. J., & McGarr, N. S. (1982). Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice (Vol. 8, pp. 221–283). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, B. G., & Levitt, H. (1978). The effect of selected prosodic errors on the intelligibility of deaf speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11(2–3), 249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden, K., & Liss, J. M. (1995). The influence of familiarity on judgments of treated speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(1), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Spencer, L., Flock, S., Tyler, R., & Gantz, B. (1999). A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchanski, R. M., & Geers, A. E. (2003). Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: A comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear & Hearing, 24(S1), S90–S105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde, K. M., Vinck, B. M., Baudonck, N., De Vel, E., & Dhooge, I. (2005). Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: A pilot study. International Journal of Audiology, 44(8), 452–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanormelingen, L., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S. (2016). A comparison of maternal and child language in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 7(2), 145–179.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J. (2002). The communicative setting and markers in speech. In J. Verhoeven (Ed.), Phonetic work in progress. Antwerp papers in linguistics (Vol. 100, pp. 177–190). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J. (2005). Illustrations of the IPA: Belgian standard Dutch. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 243–247.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J., De Pauw, G., Pettinato, M., Hirson, A., Van Borsel, J., & Mariën, P. (2013). Accent attribution in speakers with Foreign Accent Syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 156–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J., Hide, Ø., De Maeyer, S., Gillis, S., & Gillis, S. (2016). Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 24–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Baca, R. L., & Sedey, A. L. (2010). Describing the trajectory of language development in the presence of severe-to-profound hearing loss: A closer look at children with cochlear implants versus hearing aids. Otology & Neurotology, 31(8), 1268–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar