The effect of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) and frequency altered feedback (FAF) on speech production: cochlear implanted versus normal hearing individuals

References

• Barac-Cikoja, D. (2004). Effects of temporal and spectral alterations of speech feedback on speech production by persons with hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 598–603. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behroozmand, R., Korzyukov, O., Sattler, L., & Larson, C. R. (2012). Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 2468–2477. doi:10.1121/1.4746984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., … Tooher, R. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 264–285. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/022)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casserly, E. D. (2015). Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 2791–2800. doi:10.1121/1.4916965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casserly, E. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2013). Nonword repetition as a predictor of long-term speech and language skills in children with cochlear implants. Otology and Neurotology, 34, 460. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182868340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raeve, L., Vermeulen, A., & Snik, A. (2015). Verbal cognition in deaf children using cochlear implants: Effect of unilateral and bilateral stimulation. Audiology and Neurotology, 20, 261–266. doi:10.1159/000381003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettman, S. J., Dowell, R. C., Choo, D., Arnott, W., Abrahams, Y., Davis, A., … Briggs, R. J. (2016). Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months: A multicenter study. Otology and Neurotology, 37, e82–e95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1981). Effects of frequency shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, D. J., & Goffman, L. A. (2011). Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: Comparisons with typically developing age-peers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 177–189. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0165)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, G. (1955). Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 20, 333–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairbanks, G., & Guttman, N. (1958). Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 1, 12–22. doi:10.1044/jshr.0101.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert, H. R., & Campbell, M. I. (1980). Speaking fundamental frequency in three groups of hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehl, H., & Kaufman, D. K. (1984). Do the effects of adventitious deafness include disordered speech? Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 58–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280–301. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. B., McCleary, E. A., & Schulte, L. (2001). Articulatory changes with short-term deactivation of the cochlear implants of two prelingually deafened children. Ear and Hearing, 22, 29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. A., & Munhall, K. G. (2003). Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 532–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin, L., Gehtler, I., Taitelbaum, R., Kronenberg, J., Muchnik, C., & Hildesheimer, M. (2002). Development of speech perception and production in children with cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111(5_suppl), 85–90. doi:10.1177/00034894021110S518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin, L., Taitelbaum, R., Tobin, Y., & Hildesheimer, M. (1999). The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2843–2857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, N. S., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2014). A bilateral cortical network responds to pitch perturbations in speech feedback. Neuroimage, 86, 525–535. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Guenther, F. H., Denny, M., Perkell, J. S., Stockmann, E., … Zandipour, M. (2007). Effects of short-and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 913–927. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/065)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 677–709. doi:10.1044/jshr.1404.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Webster, J. W. (1991). Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 859–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, S. B., & Spitzer, J. B. (1990). A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males. Ear and Hearing, 11, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, S. B., & Spitzer, J. B. (1993). Speaking fundamental frequency, intensity, and rate of adventitiously profoundly hearing‐impaired adult women. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2146–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S., Denny, M., Lane, H., Guenther, F., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., … Burton, E. (2007). Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 505–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, N. R. (1986). Perceptual compensation for segmentally conditioned fundamental frequency perturbation. Phonetica, 43, 31–42. doi:10.1159/000261759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasisekaran, J. (2012). Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech kinematics in fluent speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115, 845–864. doi:10.2466/15.22.PMS.115.6.845-864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M. A., Jones, D., Osberger, M. J., & Miyamoto, R. T. (1998). The effect of auditory feedback on the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 19(5), 385–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M. A., Robbins, A. M., Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2000). Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science, 11(2), 153–158. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M. A., & Tobey, E. A. (1991). Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2895–2904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey, E. A., Geers, A. E., Brenner, C., Altuna, D., & Gabbert, G. (2003). Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear and Hearing, 24, 36S–45S. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051688.48224.A6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey, E. A., Geers, A. E., Sundarrajan, M., & Lane, J. (2011). Factors influencing elementary and high-school aged cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 32, 27S–38S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fa41bb
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Peng, S. C., Spencer, L. J., & Lu, N. (2008). Long-term trajectories of the development of speech sound production in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1353–1368. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye‐Murray, N. (1992). Young cochlear implant users’ response to delayed auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3483–3486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N., Spencer, L., & Woodworth, G. G. (1995). Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 327–337. doi:10.1044/jshr.3802.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldstein, R. S. (1990). Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2099–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar