Clear versus casual consonant identification by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

References

• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for learning-impaired children: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 80–97. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H. (2004). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2365–2373. doi:10.1121/1.1788730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 259–271. doi:10.1121/1.1482078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1241–1255. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H., & Morgan, S. D. (2018). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Perceived sentence clarity for young adults with normal hearing and older adults with hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61, 159–173. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 144–158. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.1.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goy, H., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & van Lieshout, P. (2016). Intelligibility of older talkers on the NU6 test. Canadian Acoustics, 44(3), 222–223.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2004). Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 362–378. doi:10.1121/1.1635842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J., & Tjaden, K. (2013). Acoustic-perceptual relationships in variants of clear speech. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 65, 148–153. doi:10.1159/000355560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, M. C. (2015). Hidden hearing loss. Scientific American, 313(2), 48–53. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0815-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maniwa, K., Jongman, A., & Wade, T. (2008). Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(2), 1114–1125. doi:10.1121/1.2821966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthies, M., Perrier, P., Perkell, J. S., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 340–353. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/028)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., Reinisch, E., & McQueen, J. M. (2018). Allophones, not phonemes in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 77–92. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., & Russell, K. (2013). How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 977–984. doi:10.1037/a0029196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., Scharenborg, O., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception. Cognition, 129, 356–361. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1998). Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. British Journal of Audiology, 32, 317–335. doi:10.3109/03005364000000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrik, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior (pp. 178–203). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 96–103. doi:10.1044/jshr.2801.96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 434–446. doi:10.1044/jshr.2904.434
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., & Tat, M. (2011). Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 304–311. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., Johnson, K., Hume, E., Kiesling, S., & Raymond, W. (2005). The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: Labelling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability. Speech Communication, 45, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack, C. J., Barker, D., & Prendergast, G. (2014). Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends in Hearing, 18, 2331216514550621. doi:10.1177/2331216514550621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. (1978). Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(2), 533–549. doi:10.1121/1.381753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poellmann, K., Bosker, H. R., McQueen, J. M., & Mitterer, H. (2014). Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 101–127. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searl, J., & Evitts, P. M. (2013). Tongue–Palate contact pressure, oral air pressure, and acoustics of clear speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 826–839. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0337)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 236–264. doi:10.1111/lnco.2009.3.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smiljanić, R., & Gilbert, R. C. (2017). Intelligibility of noise-adapted and clear speech in child, young adult, and older adult talkers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 3069–3080. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, M. (2013). A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), EL26–EL32. doi:10.1121/1.4807432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomainen, O., Hazan, V., & Romeo, R. (2016). Do talkers produce less dispersed phoneme categories in a clear speaking style? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4), EL320–EL326. doi:10.1121/1.4964815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2005, June 3). Hearing loss. Retrieved from https://www.va.gov/QUALITYOFCARE/improving/Hearing_Loss.asp
   Google Scholar
• Uchanski, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Engen, K. J. (2017). Clear speech and lexical competition in younger and older adult listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1067–1077. doi:10.1121/1.4998708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weirich, M., Fuchs, S., Simpson, A., Winkler, R., & Perrier, P. (2016). Mumbling: Macho or morphology? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, S1587–S1595. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar