3,518
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sensitivity and specificity of an acoustic- and perceptual-based tool for assessing motor speech disorders in French: the MonPaGe-screening protocol

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1060-1075 | Received 03 Jul 2020, Accepted 14 Dec 2020, Published online: 21 Jan 2021

References

  • Auzou, P., & Rolland-Monnoury, V. (2019). BECD: Batterie d’Evaluation Clinique de la Dysarthrie. Ortho-Edition.
  • Blumstein, S. (1990). Phonological deficits in aphasia: Theoretical perspectives. In A. Caramazza (Ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp. 33–53). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Boersma, P., & David Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37. http://www.praat.org/
  • Brooks, L. B., Sherman, E. M. S., Iverson, G. L., Slick, D. J., & Strauss, E. (2011). Psychometric foundations for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results. In M. R. Schoenberg & J. G. Scott (Eds.), The little black book of neuropsychology(pp. 893–922). New York: Springer.
  • Bunton, K., Kent, R. D., Duffy, J. R., Rosenbek, J. C., & Kent, J. F. (2007). Listener agreement for auditory-perceptual ratings of dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/102)
  • Cardoso, R., Guimarães, I., Santos, H., Loureiro, R., Domingos, J., de Abreu, D., Gonçalves, N., Pinto, S., & Ferreira, J. (2017). Frenchay dysarthria assessment (FDA-2) in Parkinson’s disease: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version. Journal of Neurology, 264(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8298-6
  • Chicherio, C., Genoud-Prachex, T., Assal, F., & Laganaro, M. (2019). E-GeBAS: Electronic Geneva bedside aphasia scale. [Computer program]. https://www.unige.ch/fapse/logotools/fr/adultes
  • Code, C. (1998). Major review: Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985212
  • Coppens-Hofman, M. C., Terband, H., Snik, A. F., & Maassen, B. A. (2016). Speech characteristics and intelligibility in adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 68(4), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450548
  • Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults (2nd ed.). Pro-Ed.
  • Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1975). Motor speech disorders. W.B. Saunders.
  • De Biagi, F., Frigo, A. C., Andrea, T., Sara, N., Berta, G., & Meneghello, F. (2018). Italian validation of a test to assess dysarthria in neurologic patients: A cross-sectional pilot study. Otolaryngology, 8(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-119X.1000343
  • Duffy, J. (2005). Motor speech disorders. Mosby Elsevier.
  • Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (3rd ed.). Elsevier Mosby.
  • Enderby, P., & Palmer, R. (2008). FDA-2: Frenchay dysarthria assessment (2nd ed.). PRO-ED.
  • Feiken, J., Hofstede, G., & Jonkers, R. (2008). De diagnostiek van verbale apraxia [The diagnosis of verbal apraxia]. Logopedie En Foniatrie, 80(7/8), 228–234.
  • Feiken, J., & Jonkers, R. (2012). Diagnostisch instrument voor apraxie van de spraak [DIAS; Diagnostic instrument for apraxia of speech]. Bohn, Stafleu en Van Loghum.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189.198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  • Fougeron, C., Delvaux, V., Pernon, M., Lévêque, N., Borel, S., Pellet, P., Bagou, O., Trouville, R., Ménard, L., Catalano, S., Lopez, U., Kocjancic-Antolik, T., & Laganaro, M. (2016). MonPaGe: Un protocole informatisé d’évaluation de la parole pathologique en langue française. In N. Joyeux & S. Topouzkhanian (Eds.), Actes du colloque UNADREO Orthophonie et technologies innovantes (Chapter 14, pp. 1–13). Isbergues: Orthoedition.
  • Fougeron, C., Delvaux, V., Ménard, L., & Laganaro, M. (2018). The MonPaGe_HA database for the documentation of spoken French throughout adulthood. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), L18-1679.
  • Ghio, A., Giusti, L., Blanc, E., & Pinto, S. (2019). French adaptation of the “Frenchay dysarthria assessment 2” speech intelligibility test. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 137(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2019.10.007
  • Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., de Riesthal, M., Abou-Khalil, R., & Roth, H. L. (2012). Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(Suppl), S1502–S1517.
  • Hillenbrand, J., Cleveland, R. A., & Erickson, R. L. (1994). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 37(4), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3704.769
  • Kent, R. D. (Ed.). (1992). Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Knuijt, S., Kalf, J. G., van Engelen, B. G. M., de Swart, B. J. M., & Geurts, A. C. H. (2017). The Radboud dysarthria assessment: Development and clinimetric evaluation. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 69(4), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484556
  • Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., Barsties, B., & Roy, N. (2014). The value of the acoustic voice quality index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271(6), 1609–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2730-7
  • Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., & Roy, N. (2010). The acoustic voice quality index: Toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(3), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004
  • McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed., pp. 249–268). Thieme.
  • Menin-Sicard, A., & Sicard, E. (2020). Outils de mesures et d’évaluation objective de la phonologie, de la fluence et de la prosodie avec DIADOLAB3. Réeducation orthophonique, 281, 131–168.
  • Miller, N. (2013). Measuring up to speech intelligibility. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12061
  • Pernon, M., Levêque, N., Delvaux, V., Assal, F., Borel, S., Fougeron, C., Trouville, R., & Laganaro, M. (2020). MonPaGe, un outil de screening francophone informatisé d’évaluation perceptive et acoustique des troubles moteurs de la parole (dysarthries, apraxie de la parole). Rééducation Orthophonique, 281, 171–197.
  • Solomon, N. P., Garlitz, S. J., & Milbrath, R. L. (2000). Respiratory and laryngeal contributions to maximum phonation duration. Journal of voice, 14(3), 331–340.
  • Strand, E. A., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., & Josephs, K. (2014). The apraxia of speech rating scale: A tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.008
  • Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15(1), 39–49.https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040042000115
  • Weismer, G. (2008). Speech intelligibility. In M. J. Ball, M. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 568–582). Blackwell.
  • Wertz, R., LaPointe, L., & Rosenbek, J. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults. The disorder and its management. Grune and Stratton.
  • Wuyts, L. R., De Bodt, M. S., Molenberghs, G., Remacle, M., Heylen, L., Millet, B., Van Lierde, K., Raes, J., & Van de Heyning, P. H. (2000). The dysphonia severity index: An objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(3), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.796
  • Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1978). A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(78)90024-2
  • Ziegler, W. (2002). Task-related factors in oral motor control: Speech and oral diadochokinesis in dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 80(3), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2614
  • Ziegler, W. (2008). Apraxia of speech. In G. Goldenberg & B. L. Miller (Eds.), Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology (3rd ed., pp. 269–286). Elsevier.
  • Ziegler, W. (2009). Modelling the architecture of phonetic plans: Evidence from apraxia of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802327989
  • Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2012). Apraxia of speech: Concepts and controversies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1485–S1501. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0128)
  • Ziegler, W., Schölderle, T., Staiger, A., & Vogel, M. (2015). The Bogenhausen dysarthria scales (BoDyS): A standardized test for the clinical assessment of dysarthria in adults. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 39(4), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-102792
  • Ziegler, W., Staiger, A., Schölderle, T., & Vogel, M. (2017). Gauging the auditory dimensions of dysarthric impairment: Reliability and construct validity of the Bogenhausen dysarthria scales (BoDyS). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1516–1534. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0336