396
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Indirect measures as a signal for evaluative change

, &
Pages 208-229 | Received 29 Nov 2012, Accepted 27 May 2013, Published online: 01 Jul 2013

REFERENCES

  • Bar-Anan, Y., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: A correlational investigation with large samples. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2313–2335. doi:10.1080/17470211003802442
  • Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1193–1207. doi:10.1177/0146167212446835
  • Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Chai, A. L., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014
  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241.
  • De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi:10.3758/LB.37.1.1
  • De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (in press). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
  • De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2010). Implicit measures: Similarities and differences. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 176–193). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101–114. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001
  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gast, A., De Houwer, J., & De Schryver, M. (2012). Evaluative conditioning can be modulated by memory of the CS–US pairings at the time of testing. Learning and Motivation, 43, 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.001
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 59–127). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gawronski, B., & LeBel, E. P. (2008). Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1355–1361. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.005
  • Gawronski, B., & Walther, E. (2012). What do memory data tell us about the role of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 617–623. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.002
  • Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178–188. doi:10.1086/527341
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
  • Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Bayens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
  • Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi:10.1177/0146167205275613
  • Hütter, M., Sweldens, S., Stahl, C., Unkelbach, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 539–557. doi:10.1037/a0026477
  • Jones, C. R., Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933–948. doi:10.1037/a0014747
  • Monteith, M. J., Voils, C. I., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2001). Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial biases. Social Cognition, 19, 395–417. doi:10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759
  • Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test II: Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. doi:10.1177/0146167204271418
  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00376
  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–63). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
  • Perkins, A., & Forehand, M. (2012). Implicit self-referencing: The effect of nonvolitional self-association on brand and product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 142–156. doi:10.1086/662069
  • Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2012). The formation of implicit and explicit attitudes for neutral and valenced stimuli using the self. Learning & Motivation, 43, 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.02.002
  • Perugini, M., Zogmaister, C., Richetin, J., Prestwich, A., & Hurling, R. (2013). Changing implicit attitudes by contrasting the self with others. Social Cognition, 31, 443–464.
  • Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evacuative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130–144. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
  • Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., Hurling, B., & Richetin, J. (2010). Using the self to change implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 61–71. doi:10.1002/ejsp.610
  • Pronin, E. (2009). The introspection illusion. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 1–67). Burlington, VT: Academic Press.
  • Scherer, L. D., & Schott, J. P. (2012). The affect misattribution procedure impacts future implicit and explicit judgments. Social Cognition, 30, 537–563. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.5.537
  • Smith, C. T., & Nosek, B. A. (2011). Affective focus increases the concordance between implicit and explicit attitudes. Social Psychology, 42, 300–313. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000072
  • Sprott, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., Block, L. G., Fitzsimons, G. J., Morwitz, V. G., & Williams, P. (2006). The question-behavior effect: What we know and where we go from here. Social Influence, 1, 128–137. doi:10.1080/15534510600685409
  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58–83. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
  • Stahl, C., Unkelbach, C., & Corneille, O. (2009). On the respective contributions of awareness of US valence and US identity in valence acquisition through evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 404–420. doi:10.1037/a0016196
  • Sweldens, S., van Osselaer, S. M. J., & Janiszewski, C. (2010). Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 473–489. doi:10.1086/653656
  • Walther, E., & Traselli, C. (2003). I like her, because I like myself: Self-evaluation as a source of interpersonal attitudes. Experimental Psychology, 50, 239–246. doi:10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.239
  • Weizmann Institute of Science. (1998, February 27). Quantum theory demonstrated: Observation affects reality. Science Daily. Retrieved April 2, 2013, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/02/980227055013.htm
  • Whitfield, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2009). Mutual influences of explicit and implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 748–759. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.006
  • Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., & Gast, A. (2012). Context effects in evaluative conditioning of implicit evaluations. Learning and Motivation, 43, 155–165.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.