Warmth of familiarity and chill of error: Affective consequences of recognition decisions

REFERENCES

• Allakhverdov, V. M., & Gershkovich, V. A. (2010). Does consciousness exist? In what sense? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 44(4), 340–347. doi:10.1007/s12124-010-9133-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, P., Holbrook, M. B., & Stephens, D. (1988). The formation of affective judgments: The cognitive-affective model versus the independence hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(December), 386–392. doi:10.1086/209176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Perceptual fluency and affect without recognition. Memory & Cognition, 19(3), 293–300. doi:10.3758/BF03211153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17(8), 645–648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2008). The proactive brain: Using rudimentary information to make predictive judgments. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 330(4–5), 319–330. doi:10.1002/cb.254
   Google Scholar
• Baudouin, J.-Y., Gilibert, D., Sansone, S., & Tiberghien, G. (2000). When the smile is a cue to familiarity. Memory, 8(5), 285–292. doi:10.1080/09658210050117717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25–33. doi:10.1126/science.153.3731.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279–286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonanno, G. A., & Stillings, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. The American Journal of Psychology, 99(3), 403–415. doi:10.2307/1422493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545–552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluence/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128. doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 52(3), 384–389. doi:10.1037/h0041006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2011). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chenier, T. T. (2010). On the cognitive origins of aesthetic pleasure ( Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (ProQuest document ID: 751558786). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/751558786
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, P. H., & Deldin, P. J. (2007). Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 608–616. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claypool, H. M., Hall, C. E., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2008). Positive mood, attribution, and the illusion of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 721–728. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., Monin, B., & Pleyers, G. (2005). Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs. evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 431–437. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craver-Lemley, C., & Bornstein, R. F. (2006). Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1056–1060. doi:10.3758/BF03213925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criss, A. H. (2009). The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive psychology, 59(4), 297–319. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Scott, R. B., & Seth, A. (2010). Subjective measures of implicit knowledge that go beyond confidence: Reply to Overgaard et al. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 685–686. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Seth, A. (2010). Gambling on the unconscious: A comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 674–681. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 312–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., Kessler, K., Westoby, N., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 753–758. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01609.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2004). Positivity can cue familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 585–593. doi:10.1177/0146167203262856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2010). Is it familiar or positive? Mutual facilitation of response latencies. Social Cognition, 28(2), 205–218. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.205
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the “mere exposure” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 492–500. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). Anxiety and error-related brain activity. Biological Psychology, 64(1–2), 77–90. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00103-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2004). Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain and cognition, 56(2), 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J. (2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 166–183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2000). The attractiveness of nonface averages: Implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychological Science, 11(4), 285–289. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1490–1501. doi:10.1177/01461672002612004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2003). Whatever happened to cognitive dissonance theory? The General Psychologist, 38(2), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7–16. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Heyduk, R., & Bahrick, L. (1977). Complexity, response competition, and preference. Implications for affective consequences of repeated exposure. Motivation and Emotion, 1(3), 249–259. doi:10.1007/BF00998863
   Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. (2012). Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(96). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00096
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, A. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2008). Spatiotemporal dynamics of error processing dysfunctions in major depressive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(2), 179–188. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. I.Roediger & F.Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F., Gunasekharan, S., Mayo, N., & Corley, M. (2009). Timing accuracy of web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 1–12. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207(4430), 557–558. doi:10.1126/science.7352271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819–831. doi:10.1086/523290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). The influence of positive and negative facial expressions on face familiarity. Memory, 15(1), 63–69. doi:10.1080/09658210601108732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y. (1994). The mere exposure effect: Is it a mere case of misattribution? Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 270–275.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1255–1266. doi:10.1177/01461672012710002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165. doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2009). Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 107–116. doi:10.1080/00049530802105865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129(1), 43–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1999). Changes in attractiveness of elected, rejected, and precluded alternatives: A comparison of happy and unhappy individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 988–1007. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 646–648. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice. Psychological Science, 11(2), 132–138. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2003). Remembering chosen and assigned options. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03194400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlin, M. W. (1971). Response competition, recognition, and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(3), 295–300. doi:10.1037/h0031352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1035–1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin, B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2005). Correlated averages vs. averaged correlations: Demonstrating the warm glow heuristic beyond aggregation. Social Cognition, 23(3), 257–278. doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, B., & Bright, J. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54(4), 1087–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, B., & Shanks, D. (2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 103–118. doi:10.1080/09541440500487454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371–382. doi:10.1086/344428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C. (1985). Varieties of mere exposure: The effects of processing style and repetition on affective response. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 17–30. doi:10.1086/209032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M., Timmermans, B., Sandberg, K., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 682–684. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud, N., McLeod, P., & Cowey, A. (2007). Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 10(2), 257–261. doi:10.1038/nn1840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Affective modulation of recognition bias. Emotion, 5(3), 309–318. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P., Moon, H., Rizvi, S., & Rauss, P. (2000). The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(10), 1090–1104. doi:10.1109/34.879790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., & Rauss, P. (1998). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 16(5), 295–306. doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00070-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 416–426. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14(6), 537–542. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1462.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of reaction time measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 365–370. doi:10.3758/BF03193004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2007). Mere exposure in reverse: Mood and motion modulate memory bias. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1323–1346. doi:10.1080/02699930701438319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Chacón-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 448–467. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K., Timmermans, B., Overgaard, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other? Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. doi:10.1037/h0046234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 544–555. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 711–721. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamoun, S., & Svenson, O. (2002). Value conflict and post-decision consolidation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 325–333. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71(2), 511–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Krawczyk, D. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(5), 331–336. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00678.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang, D. J. (1975). Effects of “mere exposure” on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 7–12. doi:10.1037/h0076165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., Biederman, I., & Madigan, S. (2000). Accurate identification but no priming and chance recognition memory for pictures in RSVP sequences. Visual Cognition, 7(4), 511–535. doi:10.1080/135062800394630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenson, O., & Benthorn, L. J. (1992). Consolidation processes in decision making: Post-decision changes in attractiveness of alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(2), 315–327. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(92)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Psychological Image Collection at Stirling (PICS). ( n.d.). Retrieved from http://pics.psych.stir.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 260–281. doi:10.1037/a0025658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608–618. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unicode Inc. (2011). CJK Unified Ideographs (including Extension A–D). Retrieved from http://www.unicode.org/charts/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 1787–1799. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory. NeuroImage, 45(2), 562–571. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-Y., & Chang, H.-C. (2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1055–1078. doi:10.1080/02699930341000374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Price, J. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 234–246. doi:10.3758/BF03194917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, S., Dedonder, J., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). The mere exposure effect and recognition depend on the way you look!Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 185–192. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 811–821. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J.Musch & K. C.Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 152–176. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zillman, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In J. H.Harvey, W. I.Ickes, & R. F.Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335–368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zizak, D. M., & Reber, A. S. (2004). Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(2), 336–362. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar