A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines

REFERENCES

• Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor: IJHR, 10, 395–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 12, 336–345. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity: McGraw-Hill series in psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W., Stires, L. K., Sensenig, J., & Shaban, J. (1966). The attractiveness of an eliminated choice alternative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 301–313. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90086-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaro, D. (1992). The language of jokes: Analysing verbal play. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (1969). The mechanism of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. M. B. (1983). The range of automatic spreading activation in word priming. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 417–436. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90273-6
   Google Scholar
• Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118, 111–115. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity. Humor: IJHR, 5, 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galak, J., & Nelson, L. D. (2011). The virtues of opaque prose: How lay beliefs about fluency influence perceptions of quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 250–253. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Dechêne, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687–691. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., & Topolinski, S. (2011). An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 709–716. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.496994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/lakens2/effect-sizes
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2011). Story spoilers don't spoil stories. Psychological Science, 22, 1152–1154. doi:10.1177/0956797611417007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Bär, S., & Topolinski, S. (2013). Covert painting simulations influence aesthetic appreciation of artworks. Psychological Science, 23, 1479–1481. doi:10.1177/0956797612452866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Topolinski, S. (2010). The mere exposure phenomenon: A lingering melody by Robert Zajonc. Emotion Review, 2, 329–339. doi:10.1177/1754073910375479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S., & Krutnik, F. (1990). Popular film and television comedy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27(7), 1326–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. (1982). Repetition and rated truth value of statements. The American Journal of Psychology, 95, 393–407. doi:10.2307/1422132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparenberg, P., Topolinski, S., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Minimal mimicry: Mere effector matching induces preference. Brain and Cognition, 80, 291–300. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., & Wänke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53–62. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81–100). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2011). A process model of intuition. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 274–315. doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.640078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 260–281. doi:10.1037/a0025658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2013). The sources of fluency: Identifying the underlying mechanisms of fluency effects. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking (pp. 33–49). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2012). Phasic affective modulation of creativity. Experimental Psychology, 59, 302–310. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 414–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Lindner, S., & Freudenberg, A. (in press). Popcorn in the cinema: Oral interference sabotages advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010a). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402–405. doi:10.1177/0963721410388803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010b). Immediate truth – Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution. Cognition, 114, 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Sparenberg, P. (2012). Turning the hands of time – Clockwise movements increase preference for novelty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 308–314. doi:10.1177/1948550611419266
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2008). Where there's a will – There's no intuition: The unintentional basis of semantic coherence judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 1032–1048. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1465–1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39–63. doi:10.1037/a0014678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009c). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423–433. doi:10.1037/a0014504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009d). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 608–618. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S., & Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 933–939. doi:10.1080/02699930541000066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., Masson, M. E. J., & Hughes, A. D. (2005). False memory following rapidly presented lists: The element of surprise. Psychological Research, 69, 420–430. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0213-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14–33. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. I. (1988). Perceptual play and teaching the aesthetics of comedy: A Paradigm. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22, 15–33. doi:10.2307/3333120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. (2002). The funniest joke of the world. Retrieved from http://www.richardwiseman.com/LaughLab/winner.html
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar