920
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BRIEF REPORT

Selecting decision strategies: The differential role of affect

&
Pages 158-167 | Received 06 Sep 2013, Accepted 17 Feb 2014, Published online: 13 Mar 2014

REFERENCES

  • Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 561–595. doi:10.1080/02699930903132496
  • Bless, H., Mackie, D. M., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585–595. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.585
  • Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
  • Bröder, A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 205–214.
  • Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 277–293. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.277
  • Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1, 39–54. doi:10.1177/1754073908097185
  • DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M. Y., & Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotions on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 15, 319–324. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00676.x
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238
  • Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 875–893. doi:10.1037/a0020495
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Grühn, D., Kotter-Grühn, D., & Röcke, C. (2010). Discrete affects across the adult lifespan: Evidence for multidimensionality and multidirectionality of affective experiences in young middle-aged and older adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 492–500. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.003
  • Hunsinger, M., Isbell, L. M., & Clore, G. L. (2012). Sometimes happy people focus on the trees and sad people focus on the forest: Context-dependent effects of mood in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 220–232. doi:10.117/0146167211424166
  • Huntsinger, J. R. (2013a). Does emotion directly tune the scope of attention? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 265–270. doi:10.1177/0963721413480364
  • Huntsinger, J. R. (2013b). Anger enhances correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes. Emotion, 13, 350–357. doi:10.1037/a0029974
  • Kruschke, J. (2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial introduction with R. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
  • Marewski, J. N., & Mehlhorn, K. (2011). Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 439–519.
  • Marewski, J. N., & Schooler, L. J. (2011). Cognitive niches: An ecological model of strategy selection. Psychological Review, 118, 393–437. doi:10.1037/a0024143
  • Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22, 796–810. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.796
  • Mata, R., von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2011). When easy comes hard: The development of adaptive strategy selection. Child Development, 82, 687–700. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01535.x
  • Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 11–15. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.005
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Reimer, T., & Hoffrage, U. (2006). The ecological rationality of simple group heuristics: Effects of group member strategies on decision accuracy. Theory and Decision, 60, 403–438. doi:10.1007/s11238-005-4750-2
  • Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica, 127, 258–276. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004
  • Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 135, 207–236. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207
  • Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1153–1172. doi:10.1080/02699930903274322
  • Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Testing adaptive toolbox models: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. Psychological Review, 120, 39–64. doi:10.1037/a0030777
  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • von Helversen, B., Wilke, A., Johnson, T., Schmid, G., & Klapp, B. (2011). Performance benefits of depression: Sequential decision making in a healthy sample and a clinically depressed sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 962–968. doi:10.1037/a0023238

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.