Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes

REFERENCES

• Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 1–17. doi:10.1086/321944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 283–300. doi:10.1086/519498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L., Jaffee, S., Jo, E., & Troccoli, B. (2000). On the correction of possible feeling-induced judgmental biases. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in cognition and judgments (pp. 131–152). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, K. L., Nesbit, S. M., & Murray, R. A. (2013). Driving anger and metacognition: The role of thought confidence on anger and aggressive driving intentions. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 323–334. doi:10.1002/ab.21484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Woelke, M. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does being in a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665–679. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social perception: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., & Schwarz, N. (1993). Mood states influence the production of persuasive arguments. Communication Research, 20, 696–722. doi:10.1177/009365093020005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans, A., & Baumgartner, H. (2005). Goal-relevant emotional information: When extraneous affect leads to persuasion and when it does not. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 424–434. doi:10.1086/497554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E (2006). Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: Implications for cancer prevention communications. Journal of Communication, 56, 81–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96. doi:10.1080/10463280802643640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Barden, J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as determinants of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Gallardo, I., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The effects of self-affirmation in non-threatening persuasion domains: Timing affects the process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1533–1546. doi:10.1177/0146167207306282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E, Stavraki, M., Wagner, B. C., & Díaz, D. (2014). Anger and surprise can validate or invalidate thoughts: An appraisal perspective. Unpublished manuscript. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Ease and persuasion: Multiple processes, meanings, and effects. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 101–118). London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, J. Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444–463. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00055.x
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H. (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 46–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 393–399. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1, 39–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, S. (2005). Reconciling the feelings-as-information and hedonic contingency models of how mood influences systematic information processing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1656–1679. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619–634. doi:10.1177/0146167294206001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, J., Gallardo, I., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Aguilar, P., & Briñol, P. (2009). El efecto de estrés sobre el procesamiento de mensajes persuasivos [The effect of stress on processing persuasive messages]. Revista de Psicología Social [Journal of Social Psychology], 24, 399–409. doi:10.1174/021347409789050597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 43–56. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397–416. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Muro, F., & Murray, K. B. (2014). An arousal regulation explanation of mood effects on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 574–584. doi:10.1086/664040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271–302. doi:10.1007/BF00993115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions. In Cole, J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 207–282). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: An examination of self-generated and experimeter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A.T., & Clark, J. K. (2012). Source characteristics and persuasion: The role of self-monitoring in self-validation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 383–386. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of affect and social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2004). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher, F., & Weary, G. (1991). Effect of depression on quantity and quality of social inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 107–141. doi:10.1177/1088868310367640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Nowlis, S. L. (2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: A functional evolutionary approach. Emotion, 10(2), 190–206. doi:10.1037/a0018421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal-tendency approach to the influence of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 237–244. doi:10.1177/1754073911402384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humrichouse, J., & Watson, D. (2010, February). Examining convergent and discriminant validity beyond a general factor of emotional expressivity. Poster presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R. (2013a). Does emotion directly tune the scope of attention? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 265–270. doi:10.1177/0963721413480364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R. (2013b). Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 792–802. doi:10.1177/0146167213482588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R. (2014). A flexible impact of affective feelings on priming effects: Assimilation and contrast. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 450–462. doi:10.1177/0146167213514279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R., & Clore, G. L. (2012). Emotion and meta-cognition. In P. Briñol & K. DeMarree (Eds.), Social Meta-cognition (pp. 199–218). New York, NY; Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R., Clore, G. L., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2010). Mood and global-local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global-local processing. Emotion, 10, 722–726. doi:10.1037/a0019356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar, Y., & Gilovich, T. (2011). Angry (or disgusted), but adjusting? The effect of specific emotions on adjustment from self-generated anchors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 563–569. doi:10.1177/1948550611401426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M. (1999). On the relation between affect and creative problem solving. In S. R. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. 3–17). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., & Nock, M. K. (2013). Improving acute stress responses: The power of reappraisal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 51–56. doi:10.1177/0963721412461500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 20–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933–948. doi:10.1037/a0014747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social meta-cognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koo, M., Clore, G. L., Kim, J., & Choi, I. (2012). Affective facilitation and inhibition of cultural influences on reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 680-689. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.613920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574. doi:10.1177/0146167298246001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Cognitive deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 27–40. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., Abend, T., Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (1997). How would I feel if...?: Mood as input to a role fulfillment evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 242–253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y., Laing, J., Martin, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Caffeine, cognition, and persuasion: Evidence for caffeine increasing the systematic processing of persuasive messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 160–182. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons, W. G., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Thinking straight while seeing red: The influence of anger on information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 706–720. doi:10.1177/0146167206298566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. doi:10.1177/1754073912468165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottati, V. C., & Isbell, L. M. (1996). Effects of mood during exposure to target information on subsequently reported judgments: An on-line model of misattribution and correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411–425.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W., & Hughes, D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 167–188. doi:10.1086/322896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T., & Tamar, A. (2004). Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 503–518. doi:10.1086/380285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, B., Stavraki, M., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Smiling after thinking increases reliance on thoughts. Social Psychology, 44, 349–353. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K. (2005). Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive control modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 488–503. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model: Three decades of research. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 224–245). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984a). The effects of involvement on response to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1984b). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668–672.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Sedikides, C., & Strathman, A. J. (1988). Affect and persuasion: A contemporary perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 355–371. doi:10.1177/000276488031003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752–772). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1991). Thought systems, argument quality, and persuasion. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 4, pp. 147–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874–884. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis (pp. 133–162). In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2004). Relevance override: On the reduced impact of cues under high motivation conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro, D., Inbar, Y., & Helion, C. (2011). On disgust and moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 267–268. doi:10.1177/1754073911402394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Emotion specificity and consumer behavior: Anger, sadness, and preference for activity. Motivation and Emotion, 28(1), 3–21. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000027275.95071.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 119–136. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109. doi:10.1177/0146167208317771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective status influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161–197). San Diego, CA: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, Y. H. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Affective-cognitive meta-bases versus structural bases of attitudes predict processing interest versus efficiency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1111–1123. doi:10.1177/0146167213490807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, Y. H. M., Petty, R. E., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 938–955. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. C., Hoffman, C., Mark, M. M., Martin, L. L., & Pickering, T. L. (1994). Construct accessibility and the misattribution of arousal: Schachter and Singer revisited. Psychological Science, 5(1), 15–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of General Psychology, 67(1), 159–167. doi:10.1080/00221309.1962.9711540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangor, C. (1990). Arousal, accessibility of trait constructs, and person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 305–321. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90041-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1824–1843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strick, M., Holland, R. W., van Baaren, R. B., van Knilppenbert, A., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2013). Humour in advertising: An associative processing model. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 32–69. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.822215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, A., Mellers, B., & Strebel, J. (2010). Pleasurable surprises: A cross-cultural study of consumer responses to unexpected incentives. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 792–805. doi:10.1086/605592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veling, H., Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. (2012). Anger as a hidden motivator: Associating attainable products with anger turns them into rewards. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 438–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, B. C., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Disgust and persuasion: A self-validation approach. Unpublished manuscript. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, E., Weil, R., & Dusing, J. (2011). The role of evaluative conditioning in attitude formation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 192–196. doi:10.1177/0963721411408771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034–1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Klein, D. J. (1994). Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 25–44. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093–1104. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., Kermer, D. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). The pleasures of uncertainty: Prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 5–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, L. T., & Mackie, D. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5(1), 76–94. doi:10.1521/soco.1987.5.1.76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. doi:10.1126/science.1130726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. (2010). Mood, source characteristics, and message processing: A mood-congruent expectancies approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 743–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. (2013). Mood and processing of proattitudinal and counterattitudinal messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 482–495. doi:10.1177/0146167213478020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R., Schlett, C., & Aydinli, A. (2013). Mood and threat to attitudinal freedom: Delineating the role of mood congruency and hedonic contingency in counterattitudinal message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1083–1096. doi:10.1177/0146167213490808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335–370). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar