358
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Matching between oral inward–outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects

, , , &
Pages 3-18 | Received 20 Sep 2014, Accepted 12 Jul 2015, Published online: 18 Aug 2015

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 577–660.
  • Bless, H. (2001). The consequences of mood on the processing of social information. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook in social psychology (pp. 391–412). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.
  • Cannon, P. R., Hayes, A. E., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 681–691.
  • Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach–avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17, 22–29.
  • Centerbar, D. B., Schnall, S., Clore, G. L., & Garvin, E. D. (2008). Affective incoherence: When affective concepts and embodied reactions clash. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 560–578.
  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2004). The influence of unilateral and bilateral arm flexion vs. extension on judgments: An exploratory case of a motor congruence hypothesis. Emotion, 4, 282–294.
  • Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2008). A neurobehavioral investigation into judgmental processes: Effect of bilateral motor behaviors. Brain and Cognition, 68(1), 81–91.
  • van Dantzig, S., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 345–351.
  • Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94–98.
  • Dru, V., & Cretenet, J. (2008). Influence of unilateral motor behaviors on the judgment of valenced stimuli. Cortex, 44(6), 717–727.
  • Eder, A. B. (2011). Control of impulsive emotional behaviour through implementation intentions. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 478–489.
  • Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). Common valence coding in action and evaluation: Affective blindness towards response-compatible stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1297–1322.
  • Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bi-directional evaluation-behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235.
  • Eder, A. B., Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (2012). The structure of affective action representations: Temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychological Research, 76, 111–118.
  • Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis) match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281.
  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The prepared emotional reflex: Intentional preparation of automatic approach and avoidance tendencies as a means to regulate emotional responding. Emotion, 10, 593–598.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
  • Fazendeiro, T., Chenier, T., & Winkielman, P. (2007). How dynamics of thinking create affective and cognitive feelings. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Social neuroscience (pp. 271–289). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Toward an ecological psychology. (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Goyal, R. K., & Mashimo, H. (2006). Physiology of oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motility. GI Motility Online. doi:10.1038/gimo1.
  • Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2008). Acoel development indicates the independent evolution of the bilaterian mouth and anus. Nature, 456, 382–386.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
  • Inoue, M. S., Ono, T., Honda, E., & Kurabayashid, T. (2007). Characteristics of movement of the lips, tongue and velum during a bilabial plosive – A noninvasive study using a magnetic resonance imaging movie. The Angle Orthodontist, 77, 612–618.
  • International Phonetic Association (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krieglmeyer, R., Deutsch, R., De Houwer, J., & De Raedt, R. (2010). Being moved: Valence activates approach–avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach–avoidance intentions. Psychological Science, 21, 607–613.
  • Ladefoged, P. (2001). Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics (5th ed). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., & Wheeler, M. (2015). A metaanalysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence. Cognition & Emotion, 29(6), 1069–1090.
  • Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270–1296.
  • Leder, H., Bär, S., & Topolinski, S. (2012). Covert painting simulations influence aesthetic appreciation of artworks. Psychological Science, 23, 1479–1481.
  • Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6–10.
  • Milhau, A., Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., & Brouillet, D. (2012). Bidirectional influences of emotion and action in evaluation of emotionally-connoted words. Biolinguistics, 6, 417–432.
  • Morewedge, C. K., Huh, Y. E., & Vosgerau, J. (2010). Thought for food: Imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science, 330, 1530–1533.
  • Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371–391). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1120–1136.
  • Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2009). Looking at the bright side: The affective monitoring of direction. Emotion, 9(5), 729–733.
  • Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2012). Affective monitoring: A generic mechanism for affect elicitation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 47. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00047.
  • Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach–avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 378. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.
  • Rosenthal, A. J. (Ed.). (1999). Food texture: Measurement and perception. MD: Aspe.
  • Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion, 4, 156–172.
  • Rozin, P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18–24.
  • Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 109–133). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.
  • Sakuma, T., & Kida, I. (2010). Relationship between ease of swallowing and deglutition-related muscle activity in various postures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(8), 583–589.
  • Schiele, J. T., Schneider, H., Quinzler, R., Reich, G., & Haefeli, W. E. (2014). Two techniques to make swallowing pills easier. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 550–552.
  • Schubert, T., & Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1135–1141.
  • Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. Feldman Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feelings (pp. 144–166). New York: Guilford.
  • Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach–avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713–720.
  • Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.) (2008). Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky. Psychological Science, 20, 135–138.
  • Sparenberg, P., Topolinski, S., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Minimal mimicry: Mere effector matching induces preference. Brain and Cognition, 80(3), 291–300.
  • Steklis, H. D., & Harnad, S. (1976). From hand to mouth: Some critical stages in the evolution of language. In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech (Vol. 280, pp. 1–914). New York, NY: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.
  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.
  • Titze, I. R. (2008). The human instrument. Scientific American, 298(1), 94–101.
  • Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2012). Phasic affective modulation of creativity. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 302–310.
  • Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 414–436.
  • Topolinski, S., & Bakhtiari, G. Sequential approach-avoidance movements: The case of inward and outward articulation. submitted for publication.
  • Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 885–896.
  • Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 423–433.
  • Topolinski, S., & Türk Pereira, P. (2012). Mapping the tip of the tongue – Deprivation, sensory sensitization, and oral haptics. Perception, 41(1), 71–92.
  • Topolinski, S., Zürn, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 585. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585.
  • Worrall, G., Holmes, P., & Robbins, M. (1999). Bubble bubble, abdominal trouble: A new test to chew on. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161, 1520–1521.
  • Yamamoto, S., Taniguchi, H., Hayashi, H., Hori, K., Tsujimura, T., Nakamura, Y., … Inoue, M. (2014). How do tablet properties influence swallowing behaviours? Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 66, 32–39.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.