229
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation

, , &
Pages 1595-1609 | Received 23 Apr 2016, Accepted 16 Oct 2016, Published online: 14 Nov 2016

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
  • Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. (2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1194–1208. doi:10.1177/0146167212446835
  • Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283–319. doi:10.1007/BF02310791
  • Carroll, J. D., & Wish, M. A. (1974). Multidimensional perceptual models and measurement methods. In E. C. Carterette, & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). Psychophysical judgement and measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 391–447). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328
  • De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi:10.3758/LB.37.1.1
  • De Houwer, J., Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D., & Eelen, P. (2000). Evaluative conditioning in the picture-picture paradigm with random assignment of conditioned stimuli to unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 237–242. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.237
  • Everaert, T., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. (2011). On the (un)conditionality of automatic attitude activation: The valence proportion effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 125–32. doi:10.1037/a0022316
  • Everaert, T., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. (2013). On the malleability of automatic attentional biases: Effects of feature-specific attention allocation. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 385–400. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.712949
  • Everaert, T., Spruyt, A., Rossi, V., Pourtois, G., & De Houwer, J. (2013). Feature-specific attention allocation overrules the orienting response to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1351–1359. doi:10.1093/scan/nst121
  • Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 89–110. doi:10.1080/02699931003696380
  • George, D. N., & Pearce, J. M. (1999). Acquired distinctiveness is controlled by stimulus relevance not correlation with reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 363–373. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.25.3.363
  • Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2 : A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96–101. doi:10.3758/BF03202365
  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
  • Houben, K., Schoenmakers, T. M., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). I didn’t feel like drinking but I don’t know why: The effects of evaluative conditioning on alcohol-related attitudes, craving and behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 1161–1163. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.012
  • Kattner, F. (2012). Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: Evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus. Cognition & Emotion, 26(932363961), 166–175. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.565036
  • Kattner, F., & Green, C. S. (2016). Transfer of dimensional associability in human contingency learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42(1), 15–31. doi:10.1037/xan0000082
  • Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983–997. doi:10.2307/2533558
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796–801. doi:00000487-199206000-00013
  • Lipp, O. V., Oughton, N., & LeLievre, J. (2003). Evaluative learning in human Pavlovian conditioning: Extinct, but still there? Learning and Motivation, 34, 219–239. doi:10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00011-0
  • Martin, I., & Levey, A. B. (1978). Evaluative conditioning. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 57–101. doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90013-9
  • Medin, D. L. (1983). Structural principles of categorization. In T. J. Tighe, & B. E. Shepp (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 203–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.85.3.207
  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 104–114. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.104
  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 115, 39–57. doi:00004785-198603000-00004
  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–108. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.87
  • Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266–300. doi:0033-295X/97/S3.00
  • Olson, M. A., Kendrick, R. V., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit learning of evaluative vs. non-evaluative covariations: The role of dimension accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 398–403. doi:10.1038/2061099b0
  • Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J., Burkley, M., Arbuckle, N. L., Cooley, E., Cameron, C. D., & Lundberg, K. B. (2013). Intention invention and the affect misattribution procedure: Reply to Bar-Anan and Nosek (2012). Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 375–386. doi:10.1177/0146167212475225
  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
  • Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130–144. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
  • Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90014-X
  • Rydell, R. J., & Gawronski, B. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1118–1152. doi:10.1080/02699930802355255
  • Smith, E., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3–21. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.3
  • Spruyt, A. (2014). Attention please: Evaluative priming effects in a valent/non-valent categorisation task (reply to Werner & Rothermund, 2013). Cognition & Emotion, 28, 560–569. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.832653
  • Spruyt, A., Clarysse, J., Vansteenwegen, D., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2010). Affect 4.0: A free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 57, 36–45. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000005
  • Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D. (2009). Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 37–54. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
  • Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., Everaert, T., & Hermans, D. (2012). Unconscious semantic activation depends on feature-specific attention allocation. Cognition, 122, 91–95. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.017
  • Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2007). Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses. Experimental Psychology, 54, 44–53. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.44
  • Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses. Social Cognition, 20, 227–256. doi:10.1521/soco.20.3.227.21106
  • Spruyt, A., Klauer, K. C., Gast, A., De Schryver, M., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Feature-specific attention allocation modulates the generalization of recently acquired likes and dislikes. Experimental Psychology, 61, 85–98. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000228
  • Spruyt, A., & Tibboel, H. (2015). On the automaticity of the evaluative priming effect in the valent/non-valent categorization task. PloS One, 10, e0121564. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121564
  • Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. London: Academic Press.
  • Trobalon, J. B., Miguelez, D., McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2003). Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29(2), 143–152. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.143
  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
  • Vanaelst, J., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. (2016). How to modify (implicit) evaluations of fear-related stimuli: Effects of feature-specific attention allocation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00717
  • Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 175–196. doi:10.1080/02699930441000274

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.