Subliminal gaze cues increase preference levels for items in the gaze direction

References

• Al-Janabi, S., & Finkbeiner, M. (2012). Effective processing of masked eye gaze requires volitional control. Experimental Brain Research, 216, 433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2944-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwall, N., Johansson, D., & Hansen, S. (2010). The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 729–732. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, P. E., Slessor, G., Rendell, P. G., Bennetts, R. J., Campbell, A., & Ruffman, T. (2014). Age differences in conscious versus subconscious social perception: The influence of face age and valence on gaze following. Psychology and Aging, 29, 491–502. doi: 10.1037/a0036249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 631–650. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104, 644–653. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1061–1066. doi: 10.3758/bf03213926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social-behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070–1079. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A. P., Elena, M. R., & Becchio, C. (2015). One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 850–855. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaner, R. O., Shepherd, S. V., & Platt, M. L. (2007). Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men. Biology Letters, 3, 65–68. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo, N., Saiki, J., Nakao, Y., & Saito, H. (2003). Perceptual judgments of novel contour shapes and hierarchical descriptions of geometrical properties. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 74, 346–353. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.74.346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng, Q., Zheng, Y. Q., Zhang, X. M., Song, Y., Luo, Y. J., Li, Y. D., & Talhelm, T. (2011). Gender differences in visual reflexive attention shifting: Evidence from an ERP study. Brain Research, 1401, 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., Rowe, A., & Leonards, U. (2011). I trust you; hence, I like the things you look at: Gaze cueing and sender trustworthiness influence object evaluation. Social Cognition, 29, 476–485. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, P., Hirshman, E., Wharton, W., Stangl, B., Devlin, J., & Lenz, A. (2007). Evidence for gender differences in visual selective attention. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 597–609. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuda, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Women dislike what men look at: Gender difference in preference for gaze-cued objects. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 188.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, W., Kubota, Y., & Toichi, M. (2014). Enhanced subliminal emotional responses to dynamic facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, W., Okada, T., & Toichi, M. (2007). Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarandescu, L., & Shimp, T. A. (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: Testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26, 715–726. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9294-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strick, M., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Seductive eyes: Attractiveness and direct gaze increase desire for associated objects. Cognition, 106, 1487–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Luypaert, G. (2012). L-eye to me: The combined role of need for cognition and facial trustworthiness in mimetic desires. Cognition, 122, 247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa, J. L., Marchetti, C., Taffou, M., & George, N. (2015). Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other’s gaze. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 460–470. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.919899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 10, 939–943. doi: 10.1037/a0020501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2011). The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar