1,132
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Subliminal gaze cues increase preference levels for items in the gaze direction

&
Pages 1146-1151 | Received 03 Apr 2017, Accepted 17 Aug 2017, Published online: 29 Aug 2017

References

  • Al-Janabi, S., & Finkbeiner, M. (2012). Effective processing of masked eye gaze requires volitional control. Experimental Brain Research, 216, 433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2944-0
  • Alwall, N., Johansson, D., & Hansen, S. (2010). The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 729–732. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.016
  • Bailey, P. E., Slessor, G., Rendell, P. G., Bennetts, R. J., Campbell, A., & Ruffman, T. (2014). Age differences in conscious versus subconscious social perception: The influence of face age and valence on gaze following. Psychology and Aging, 29, 491–502. doi: 10.1037/a0036249
  • Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 631–650. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000124
  • Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104, 644–653. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.012
  • Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1061–1066. doi: 10.3758/bf03213926
  • Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social-behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070–1079. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1070
  • Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A. P., Elena, M. R., & Becchio, C. (2015). One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 850–855. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z
  • Deaner, R. O., Shepherd, S. V., & Platt, M. L. (2007). Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men. Biology Letters, 3, 65–68. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0564
  • Endo, N., Saiki, J., Nakao, Y., & Saito, H. (2003). Perceptual judgments of novel contour shapes and hierarchical descriptions of geometrical properties. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 74, 346–353. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.74.346
  • Feng, Q., Zheng, Y. Q., Zhang, X. M., Song, Y., Luo, Y. J., Li, Y. D., & Talhelm, T. (2011). Gender differences in visual reflexive attention shifting: Evidence from an ERP study. Brain Research, 1401, 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.041
  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
  • King, D., Rowe, A., & Leonards, U. (2011). I trust you; hence, I like the things you look at: Gaze cueing and sender trustworthiness influence object evaluation. Social Cognition, 29, 476–485. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.476
  • Merritt, P., Hirshman, E., Wharton, W., Stangl, B., Devlin, J., & Lenz, A. (2007). Evidence for gender differences in visual selective attention. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 597–609. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.016
  • Mitsuda, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Women dislike what men look at: Gender difference in preference for gaze-cued objects. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 188.
  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
  • Sato, W., Kubota, Y., & Toichi, M. (2014). Enhanced subliminal emotional responses to dynamic facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00994
  • Sato, W., Okada, T., & Toichi, M. (2007). Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x
  • Smarandescu, L., & Shimp, T. A. (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: Testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26, 715–726. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9294-1
  • Strick, M., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Seductive eyes: Attractiveness and direct gaze increase desire for associated objects. Cognition, 106, 1487–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.008
  • Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Luypaert, G. (2012). L-eye to me: The combined role of need for cognition and facial trustworthiness in mimetic desires. Cognition, 122, 247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.006
  • Ulloa, J. L., Marchetti, C., Taffou, M., & George, N. (2015). Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other’s gaze. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 460–470. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.919899
  • van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 10, 939–943. doi: 10.1037/a0020501
  • Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2011). The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.