Mixed matters: fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications

References

• AdamsJr, R. B., Ambady, N., Macrae, C. N., & Kleck, R. E. (2006). Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 177–186. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 437–442. doi: 10.1177/0963721413498894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369–9372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601071103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., & Weisbuch, M. (2011). Facial expressions: Culture and context. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, J. V. Haxby, & M. H. Johnson (Eds.), The handbook of face perception (pp. 479–488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aviezer, H., Hassin, R. R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., & Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19, 724–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D. R., Guitart-Masip, M., Packard, P. A., Miró, J., Falip, M., Fuentemilla, L., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Human hippocampus arbitrates approach-avoidance conflict. Current Biology, 24, 541–547. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 35–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale, J. M., & Keil, F. C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217–239. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00669-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlow, S., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1990). Facial appearance, gender, and credibility in television commercials. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 51–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01006579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, A. J., Burton, A. M., Miller, P., Young, A. W., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research, 41, 1179–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadas, E., Lupianez, J., Kawakami, K., Niedenthal, P. M., & Rodrıguez-Bailon, R. (2016). Perceiving emotions: Cueing social categorization processes and attentional control through facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1149–1163. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1052781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. W., Brady, T. F., & Winkielman, P. (2017). Are you smiling or have I seen you before? Familiarity makes faces look happier. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1087–1102. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. W., Hofree, G., Sheldon, K., Saygin, A. P., & Winkielman, P. (2017). Is that a human? Categorization (dis)fluency drives evaluations of agents ambiguous on human-likeness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 651–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. W., Rotteveel, M., & Winkielman, P. (2016). Easy moves: Perceptual fluency facilitates approach-related action. Emotion, 16, 540–552. doi: 10.1037/emo0000146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of great art and untalented artists: Effort information and the flexible construction of judgmental heuristics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. S., & Taraban, C. B. (1991). Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324–336. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90029-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., … Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. doi: 10.1348/014466608X314935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimberg, U., & Ohman, A. (1996). Behold the wrath: Psychophysiological responses to facial stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 149–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02253869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotsch, R., Hassin, R. R., & Todorov, A. (2016). Statistical learning shapes face evaluation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0001. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & O’Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 414–420. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1979). Facial expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 527–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 276–290. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Easy on the eyes, or hard to categorize: Classification difficulty decreases the appeal of facial blends. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, U. (2017). Emotion categorization. In C. Lefebvre & H. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (2nd ed., pp. 107–126). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann, G. (2003). What do facial expressions convey: Feeling states, behavioral intentions, or actions requests? Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 3, 150–166. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. W: H. L. Roediger, F. I. M. Craik (red.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (s. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02281954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151–165. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5, 119–124. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55–74. doi: 10.1177/0022022107311854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montepare, J. M., & Dobish, H. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 237–254. doi: 10.1023/A:1027332800296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neth, D., & Martinez, A. M. (2009). Emotion perception in emotionless face images suggests a norm-based representation. Journal of Vision, 9, 5. doi: 10.1167/9.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M., & Hess, U. (2010). The simulation of smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 417–433. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohlen, H. U., van Harreveld, F., Rotteveel, M., Lelieveld, G.-J., & Crone, E. A. (2014). Evaluating ambivalence: Social-cognitive and affective brain regions associated with ambivalent decision-making. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 924–931. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszanowski, M., Pochwatko, G., Kukliński, K., Ścibor-Rylski, M., Lewinski, P., & Ohme, R. (2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087–11092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805664105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, H. E., Halberstadt, J., Carr, E. W., & Winkielman, P. (2016). Johnny Depp, reconsidered: How category-relative processing fluency determines the appeal of gender ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0146328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, A., & Wentura, D. (2015). It depends: Approach and avoidance reactions to emotional expressions are influenced by the contrast emotions presented in the task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 2, 197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkham, A. E., Griffin, M., Baron, R., Sasson, N. J., & Gur, R. C. (2010). The face in the crowd effect: Anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 10, 141–146. doi: 10.1037/a0017387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Duchaine, B., Olivola, C. Y., & Chater, N. (2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e34293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1997). Reading emotion from and into faces: Resurrecting a dimensional-contextual perspective. In J. A. Russell, & J. M. Fernandez-Dols (Eds.), The psychology of facial expression (pp. 295–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneirla, T. C. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–42). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2010). Meaning in context: Metacognitive experiences. In B. Mesquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 105–125). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2015). Metacognition. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (pp. 203–229). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00069-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebe, N., Lew, M., Sun, Y., Cohen, I., Gevers, T., & Huang, T. S. (2007). Authentic facial expression analysis. Image and Vision Computing, 25, 1856–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F. W., & Schyns, P. G. (2009). Smile through your fear and sadness: Transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances. Psychological Science, 20, 1202–1208. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02427.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 260–271. doi: 10.1080/02699930801994112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kleef, G. A., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Stanton, K. (2017). Emotion blends and mixed emotions in the hierarchical structure of affect. Emotion Review, 9(2), 99–104. doi: 10.1177/1754073916639659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkowski, B. M., & Meier, B. P. (2010). Bring it on: Angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 201–210. doi: 10.1037/a0017992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 121–135. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation increases positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799–806. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 89–111). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Olszanowski, M., & Gola, M. (2015). Faces In-between: Evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency. Emotion, 15, 232–242. doi: 10.1037/emo0000036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 124–126. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263. doi: 10.1177/01461672982412001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L. A., Kikuchi, M., & Fellous, J. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 175–189. doi: 10.1037/a0017990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2017). When trust comes easy: Articulatory fluency increases transfers in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar