Looking into your eyes: observed pupil size influences approach-avoidance responses

References

• Beatty, J., & Kahneman, D. (1966). Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychonomic Science, 5, 371–372. doi: 10.3758/BF03328444
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 189–206. doi: 10.1080/02699930125883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis) match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9602–9605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152159999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, N. A., Wilson, C. E., & Critchley, H. D. (2007). Processing of observed pupil size modulates perception of sadness and predicts empathy. Emotion, 7, 724–729. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H. (1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212, 46–54. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0465-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349–350. doi: 10.1126/science.132.3423.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem solving. Science, 143, 1190–1192. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3611.1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 47, 310–339. doi: 10.1037/h0078820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kret, M. E. (2015). Emotional expressions beyond facial muscle actions. A call for studying autonomic signals and their impact on social perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kret, M. E., & De Dreu, C. K. (2017). Pupil-mimicry conditions trust in partners: Moderation by oxytocin and group membership. Proocedings of the Biological Sciences, 284(1850).
   Google Scholar
• Kret, M. E., Fischer, A. H., & De Dreu, C. K. (2015). Pupil mimicry correlates with trust in in-group partners with dilating pupils. Psychological Science, 26, 1401–1410. doi: 10.1177/0956797615588306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Pupillometry: A window to the preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 18–27. doi: 10.1177/1745691611427305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., & Wheeler, M. (2015). A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 1069–1090. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.968096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Martin, D. (2007). A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 793–805. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladino, M. P., & Castelli, L. (2008). On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: Activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 755–768. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochazkova, E., & Kret, M. E. (2017). Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 99–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005). On the categorization of admired and disliked exemplars of admired and disliked racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 517–530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senju, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., Young, S. G., Rule, N. O., Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2012). Embodied impression formation: Social judgments and motor cues to approach and avoidance. Social Cognition, 30, 232–240. doi: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review Psychology, 66, 519–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 211–279). San Diego: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Breen, J., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Kret, M. E. (2018). Pupil to pupil: Effect of a partner’s pupil size on (dis)honest behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Schalk, J., Hawk, S. T., Fischer, A. H., & Doosje, B. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam dynamic facial expression set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920. doi: 10.1037/a0023853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 641–654. doi: 10.1023/A:1020981501383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L., & Collins, M. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204–223. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar