The influence of pre-training evaluative responses on approach-avoidance training outcomes

References

• Amir, N., Kuckertz, J. M., & Najmi, S. (2013). The effect of modifying automatic action tendencies on overt avoidance behaviors. Emotion, 13(3), 478–484. doi: 10.1037/a0030443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, G., Körner, A., & Topolinski, S. (2016). The role of fluency in preferences for inward over outward words. Acta Psychologica, 171, 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, D., Jostmann, N. B., Wiers, R. W., & Holland, R. W. (2015). Approach avoidance training in the eating domain: Testing the effectiveness across three single session studies. Appetite, 85, 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckler, S. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191–1205. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer Health Informatics Research Resource - Age. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://chirr.nlm.nih.gov/state-reactance.php.
   Google Scholar
• Eberl, C., Wiers, R. W., Pawelczack, S., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2013). Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Dignath, D. (2014). I like to get nothing: Implicit and explicit evaluation of avoided negative outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(1), 55–62. doi: 10.1037/xan0000005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eder, A. B., Elliot, A. J., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach and avoidance motivation: Issues and advances. Emotion Review, 5(3), 227–229. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Hommel, B. (2013). Anticipatory control of approach and avoidance: An ideomotor approach. Emotion Review, 5(3), 275–279. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwart, T., Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2006). From fear to love: Individual differences in implicit spider associations. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 6(1), 18–27. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Roefs, A. (2009). Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 431–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M., & Page, S. (1989). A Psychological Reactance Scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64(3), 1323–1326. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijding, J., Field, A. P., De Houwer, J., Vandenbosch, K., Rinck, M., & van Oeveren, M. (2009). A behavioral route to dysfunctional representations: The effects of training approach or avoidance tendencies towards novel animals in children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(6), 471–477. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., Vilensky, M. R., Vasey, M. W., & Fazio, R. H. (2013). Approach behavior can mitigate predominately univalent negative attitudes: Evidence regarding insects and spiders. Emotion, 13(5), 989–996. doi: 10.1037/a0033164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. doi: 10.1037/h0032590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem, N. O., Lee, J. W., Modeste, N. N., & Johnston, P. K. (2003). Understanding soft drink consumption among female adolescents using the theory of planned behavior. Health Education Research, 18(3), 278–291. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, A., & Eder, A. B. (2018). No effects of explicit approach-avoidance training on immediate consumption of soft drinks. Appetite, 130, 209–218. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krypotos, A.-M., Arnaudova, I., Effting, M., Kindt, M., & Beckers, T. (2015). Effects of approach-avoidance training on the extinction and return of fear responses. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0131581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., McGraw, A. P., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). The evaluative space grid: A single-item measure of positivity and negativity. Cognition and Emotion, 23(3), 453–480. doi: 10.1080/02699930801994054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K. P., Wiers, R. W., Teachman, B. A., Gasser, M. L., Westgate, E. C., Cousijn, J., … Neighbors, C. (2015). Attempted training of alcohol approach and drinking identity associations in US undergraduate drinkers: null results from two studies. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0134642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, G., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (2018). The contextual malleability of approach-avoidance training effects: Approaching or avoiding fear conditioned stimuli modulates effects of approach-avoidance training. Cognition and Emotion, 32(2), 341–349. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1308315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, A., & Wentura, D. (2016). It depends: Approach and avoidance reactions to emotional expressions are influenced by the contrast emotions presented in the task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 197–212. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2012). The formation of implicit and explicit attitudes for neutral and valenced stimuli using the self. Learning and Motivation, 43(3), 135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D. (2009). Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1), 37–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritzke, W. G. K., McEvoy, P. M., Wheat, L. R., Dyer, K. R., & French, D. J. (2007). The Yin and Yang of indulgence and restraint: The ambivalence model of craving. In P. W. O’Neal (Ed.), Motivation of health behavior (pp. 31–47). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch, K., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach–avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25(7), 1311–1330. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., & Gast, A. (2016). Approach–avoidance training effects are moderated by awareness of stimulus–action contingencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(1), 81–93. doi: 10.1177/0146167215615335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Roets, A., & Gast, A. (2016). Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), e1–e15. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Eder, A., & Hughes, S. J. (2018). Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Gawronski, B., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Mechanisms underlying approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation: Results of a preregistered adversarial collaboration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Complete, 69, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (in press). How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Retrieved from https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8570657/file/8570659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Uijen, S. L., van den Hout, M., & Engelhard, I. M. (2015). Active approach does not add to the effects of in vivo exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 6(1), 112–125. doi: 10.5127/jep.042014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22(4), 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers, R. W., Houben, K., Fadardi, J. S., van Beek, P., Rhemtulla, M., & Cox, W. M. (2015). Alcohol cognitive bias modification training for problem drinkers over the web. Addictive Behaviors, 40, 21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K., & Strack, F. (2010). Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction, 105(2), 279–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkowski, B. M., & Meier, B. P. (2010). Bring it on: Angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 201–210. doi: 10.1037/a0017992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., Lange, W.-G., & Rinck, M. (2013). Effects of approach-avoidance training on implicit and explicit evaluations of neutral, angry, and smiling Face stimuli. Psychological Reports, 113(1), 199–216. doi: 10.2466/21.07.PR0.113x10z1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogmaister, C., Perugini, M., & Richetin, J. (2016). Motivation modulates the effect of approach on implicit preferences. Cognition and Emotion, 30(5), 890–911. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1032892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar