Cognition and emotion: a plea for theory

References

• Adam, C., Herzig, A., & Longin, D. (2009). A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions. Synthese, 168, 201–248. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9460-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. B. (1970). Perennial problems in the field of emotion. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 169–185). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. B., & Gasson, J. A. (1954). Feelings and emotions as dynamic factors in personality integration. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), The human person: An approach to an integral theory of personality (pp. 294–313). New York, NY: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203. doi: 10.1177/1088868307301033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, G., Bohse, H., Voigt, C., et al. (2007). Argunet. A virtual argumentation platform for rule-guided reasoning. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation 2007 (pp. 119–122). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, R. A., D’Mello, S. K., Gratch, J., & Kappas, A. (Eds.). 2015. Oxford handbook of affective computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, N., Larsen, J., & Lench, H. (2017). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback hypothesis literature. Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/xkm52/
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1971). Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 87–106. doi: 10.2307/2025382
   Google Scholar
• Durán, J. I., Reisenzein, R., & Fernández-Dols, J.-M. (2017). Coherence between emotions and facial expressions: A research synthesis. In J. A. Russell & J.-M. Fernández–Dols (Eds.), The science of facial expression (pp. 107–129). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 112–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gratch, J., Marsella, S., Wang, N., & Stankovic, B. (2009). Assessing the validity of appraisal–based models of emotion. Proceedings of the international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Green, O. H. (1992). The emotions: A philosophical theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1983). The life of a psychologist: An autobiography. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York, NY: Appleton–Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1 & 2). New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1890).
   Google Scholar
• Junge, M., & Reisenzein, R. (2013). Indirect scaling methods for testing quantitative emotion theories. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1247–1275. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.782267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, M., & Reisenzein, R. (2015). Maximum likelihood difference scaling versus ordinal difference scaling of emotion intensity: A comparison. Quality & Quantity, 49, 2169–2185. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0100-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, M., & Reisenzein, R. (2016). Metric scales for emotion measurement. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 58, 497–530.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762–1776. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki, M., Hyönä, J., Koivisto, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2015). Affective processing requires awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 339–365. doi: 10.1037/xge0000040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, J. D. (2007). Feelings: The perception of self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J. (2014). Emotion’s response patterns: The brain and the autonomic nervous system. Emotion Review, 6, 93–99. doi: 10.1177/1754073913512004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1981). A cognitivist’s reply to Zajonc on emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 36, 222–223. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinning of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (2014). Coming to terms with fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(8), 2871–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400335111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H., & Tomarken, J. (1986). Emotion: Today’s problems. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 565–610. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.003025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, L., Cardoso, A., Reisenzein, R., Lorini, L., & Castelfranchi, C. (2009). Artificial surprise. In J. Vallverdu & D. Casacuberta (Eds.), Handbook of research on synthetic emotions and sociable robotics: New applications in affective computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 267–291). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, I. B., & Robinson, M. D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 209–237. doi: 10.1080/02699930802204677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellers, B. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910–924. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, W.-U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274. doi: 10.1023/A:1024422330338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2015). Expectancy and emotion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A., Boddez, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2017). The power of goal-directed processes in the causation of emotional and other actions. Emotion Review, 9, 310–318. doi: 10.1177/1754073916669595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The role of appraisal in emotion. In M. D. Robinson, E. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 131–155). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2010). Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 222–246. doi: 10.1037/a0018858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50. doi: 10.1080/02699938708408362
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1994). “Unconscious anxiety”: Phobic responses to masked stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 231–240. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B. (1995). Ideas and realities of emotion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pauen, M. (2002). Grundprobleme der Philosophie des Geistes [Basic problems of the philosophy of mind]. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Peira, N., Golkar, A., Öhman, A., Anders, S., & Wiens, S. (2012). Emotional responses in spider fear are closely related to picture awareness. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 252–260. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.579087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Bühner, M. (2014). Self-report measures of academic emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 561–579). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (1983). The Schachter theory of emotion: Two decades later. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 239–264. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (1996). Emotional action generation. In W. Battmann & S. Dutke (Eds.), Processes of the molar regulation of behavior (pp. 151–165). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2000a). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1–38. doi: 10.1080/026999300378978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2000b). Wundt’s three–dimensional theory of emotion. In W. Balzer, J. D. Sneed, & C. U. Moulines (Eds.), Structuralist knowledge representations: Paradigmatic examples (Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities, Vol. 75) (pp. 219–250). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2001). Appraisal processes conceptualized from a schema-theoretic perspective: Contributions to a process analysis of emotions. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 187–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2006). Arnold’s theory of emotion in historical perspective. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 920–951. doi: 10.1080/02699930600616445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2009a). Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief-desire theory of emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 6–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2009b). Emotional experience in the computational belief–desire theory of emotion. Emotion Review, 1, 214–222. doi: 10.1177/1754073909103589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2012). What is an emotion in the belief-desire theory of emotion? In F. Paglieri, L. Tummolini, R. Falcone, & M. Miceli (Eds.), The goals of cognition: Essays in honor of Cristiano Castelfranchi (pp. 181–211). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2015a). Social emotions from the perspective of the computational belief–desire theory of emotion. In A. Herzig & E. Lorini (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of group attitudes and social interaction (Studies in the philosophy of sociality, Vol. 5) (pp. 153–176). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2015b). On the role of emotions in decision making: Answering McDougall’s challenge. Talk delivered at the expert meeting annex to ISSAS’14, action meets emotion, Geneva, July 7-3, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2017). Varieties of cognition-arousal theory. Emotion Review, 9, 17–26. doi: 10.1177/1754073916639665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2018). Emotion theories of the 19th century at the rise of scientific psychology: Darwin, James, Wundt, Meinong, and Freud. In A. Scarantino (Ed.), Routledge handbook of emotion theory. London: Routledge. (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Bördgen, S., Holtbernd, T., & Matz, D. (2006). Evidence for strong dissociation between emotion and facial displays: The case of surprise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 295–315. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2017). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, Early View, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Hudlicka, E., Dastani, M., Gratch, J., Hindriks, K., Lorini, E., & Meyer, J.-J. C. (2013). Computational modeling of emotion: Toward improving the inter- and intradisciplinary exchange. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4, 246–266. doi: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2013.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Meyer, W.- U., & Schützwohl, A. (2003). Einführung in die Emotionspsychologie, Band III: Kognitive Emotionstheorien [Introduction to emotion psychology, Vol 3: Cognitive emotion theories]. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., & Rudolph, U. (2008a). The discovery of common–sense psychology. Social Psychology, 39, 141–150. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., & Rudolph, U. (2018b). The attributional theory of motivation and emotion: Not surprisingly, true. Motivation Science, 4, 21–23. doi: 10.1037/mot0000098
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., & Stephan, A. (2014). More on James and the physical basis of emotion. Emotion Review, 6, 35–46. doi: 10.1177/1754073913501395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., & Studtmann, M. (2007). On the expression and experience of surprise: No evidence for facial feedback, but evidence for a reverse self–inference effect. Emotion, 7, 612–627. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Studtmann, M., & Horstmann, G. (2013). Coherence between emotion and facial expression: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Emotion Review, 5, 16–23. doi: 10.1177/1754073912457228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2009). Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarantino, A., & de Sousa, R. (2018). Emotion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/emotion/
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S. (1964). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 49–80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3459–3474. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Bänziger, T., & Roesch, E. (2010). A blueprint for affective computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17, 551–566. doi: 10.1037/a0029487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U., & Chen, Y. (2017). The power of the pen paradigm: A replicability analysis. Replicability-Index, 5 September 2017. Retrieved from https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/2017/09/04/the-power-of-the-pen-paradigm-a-replicability-analysis/
   Google Scholar
• Schützwohl, A., & Reisenzein, R. (2012). Facial expressions in response to a highly surprising event exceeding the field of vision: A test of Darwin’s theory of surprise. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbeck, J., Robinson, M. D., & McCourt, M. E. (2006). Semantic processing precedes affect retrieval: The neurological case for cognitive primacy in visual processing. Review of General Psychology, 10, 41–55. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.10.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studtmann, M., Otto, J. H., & Reisenzein, R. (2009). Methoden zur Induktion von Emotionen [Methods of emotion induction]. In V. Brandstätter & J. H. Otto (Eds.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie: Motivation und Emotion [Handbook of general psychology: Motivation and emotion] (pp. 540–549). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017). Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 111–124. doi: 10.5334/irsp.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Berg, T., van Gelder, T., Patterson, F., & Teppema, S. (2013). Critical thinking: Reasoning and communicating with rationale. Amsterdam: Pearson Education Benelux bv.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., & Gronau, Q. F. (2016). Registered replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 917–928. doi: 10.1177/1745691616674458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 3–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar