962
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cognitive engagement in emotional text reading: concurrent recordings of eye movements and head motion

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1448-1460 | Received 02 Jul 2018, Accepted 22 Jan 2019, Published online: 30 Jan 2019

References

  • Abrams, R. A., & Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science, 2, 153–157.
  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35
  • Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50, 84–94.
  • Baccino, T. (2011). Eye movements and concurrent event-related potentials: Eye fixation-related potential investigations in reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 857–870). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Baccino, T., & Manunta, Y. (2005). Eye-fixation-related potentials: Insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(3), 204–215.
  • Balaban, C. D., Cohn, J., Redfern, M. S., Prinkey, J., Stripling, R., & Hoffer, M. (2004). Postural control as a probe for cognitive state: Exploiting human information processing to enhance performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2), 275–286.
  • Ballenghein, U., & Baccino, T. (2018). Referential processing during reading: Concurrent recordings of eye movements and head motion. Cognitive Processing. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0894-1
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.
  • Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276.
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of: The learning sciences (pp. 475–488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bonnet, C. T., Szaffarczyk, S., & Baudry, S. (2016). Functional synergy between postural and visual behaviors when performing a difficult precise visual task in upright stance. Cognitive Science, 41(6), 1675–1693.
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
  • Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44–48.
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli Instruction and affective Ratings (Technical Report No. C-1). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
  • Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607.
  • Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41(1), 75–85.
  • Citron, F. M., Gray, M. A., Critchley, H. D., Weekes, B. S., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: Neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework. Neuropsychologia, 56, 79–89.
  • Cowan, N. (1998). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Lieu: Oxford University Press.
  • D'Mello, S., Chipman, P., & Graesser, A. (2007). Posture as a predictor of learner's affective engagement. Proceedings of the 29th annual cognitive science society (Vol. 1, pp. 905–910). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211.
  • Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850.
  • Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Frijda, N. H. (2009). Emotion experience and its varieties. Emotion Review, 1(3), 264–271.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(1), 69.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585.
  • Grafsgaard, J. F., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E. N., & Lester, J. C. (2012). Analyzing posture and affect in task-oriented tutoring. Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
  • Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement and depth of processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 187.
  • Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30.
  • Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
  • Holt, L. E., & Beilock, S. L. (2006). Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 694–701.
  • Ikehara, C. S., & Crosby, M. E. (2005). Assessing cognitive load with physiological sensors. Proc. HICSS, Big Island, Hawaii, pp. 295–303.
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective basis of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
  • Janisse, M. P. (1977). Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing.
  • Kaakinen, J. K., Ballenghein, U., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2018). Fluctuation in cognitive engagement during reading: Evidence from concurrent recordings of postural and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(10), 1671–1677. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000539
  • Kakolewski, K. E., Crowson, J. J., Sewell, K. W., & Cromwell, R. L. (1999). Laterality, word valence, and visual attention: A comparison of depressed and non-depressed individuals. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 34, 283–292. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00085-9
  • Kneepkens, E., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125–138.
  • Knickerbocker, H., Johnson, R. L., & Altarriba, J. (2015). Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing. Cognition and Emotion, 29(5), 784–806.
  • Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481.
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes, 97, 135.
  • McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., Finstad, K., & Bourg, T. (2000). The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 492.
  • Mills, C., D'Mello, S. K., & Kopp, K. (2015). The influence of consequence value and text difficulty on affect, attention, and learning while reading instructional texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 9–20.
  • Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1647. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2
  • Palinko, O., Kun, A. L., Shyrokov, A., & Heeman, P. (2010, March). Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the 2010 symposium on eye-tracking research & applications (pp. 141–144). New York: ACM.
  • Pedrotti, M., Mirzaei, M. A., Tedesco, A., Chardonnet, J.-R., Mérienne, F., Benedetto, S., & Baccino, T. (2014). Automatic stress classification with pupil diameter analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(3), 220–236.
  • Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380–391.
  • Qiu, J., & Helbig, R. (2012). Body posture as an indicator of workload in mental work. Human Factors, 54(4), 626–635.
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465–479.
  • Scott, G. G., O'donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783.
  • Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13.
  • Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization–minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85.
  • Underwood, G., Jebbett, L., & Roberts, K. (2004). Inspecting pictures for information to verify a sentence: Eye movements in general encoding and in focused search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(1), 165–182.
  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension (pp. 11–12). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Witchel, H. J., Santos, C. P., Ackah, J. K., Westling, C. E., & Chockalingam, N. (2016). Non-instrumental movement inhibition (NIMI) differentially suppresses head and thigh movements during screenic engagement: Dependence on interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 157.
  • Witchel, H. J., Westling, C. E., Tee, J., Healy, A., Needham, R., & Chockalingam, N. (2014). What does not happen: Quantifying embodied engagement using NIMI and self-adaptors. Participations, 11(1), 304–331.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 21, 3–17.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.