The impact of instruction- and experience-based evaluative learning on IAT performance: a Quad model perspective

References

• Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2010). Social context and the self-regulation of implicit bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 137–149. doi: 10.1177/1368430209353635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. Handbook of Social Cognition, 1, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57–86. doi: 10.3758/BF03210812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calanchini, J., Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2013). Counter-prejudicial training reduces activation of biased associations and enhances response monitoring. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 321–325. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calanchini, J., Lai, C. K., & Klauer, K. C. (2019). A process-level meta-analysis of implicit bias-reduction interventions. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Calanchini, J., & Sherman, J. W. (2013). Implicit attitudes reflect associative, non-associative, and non-attitudinal processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 654–667. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12053
   Google Scholar
• Calanchini, J., Sherman, J. W., Klauer, K. C., & Lai, C. K. (2014). Attitudinal and non-attitudinal components of IAT performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1285–1296. doi: 10.1177/0146167214540723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533–541. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2006). Using the implicit association test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12111
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), e28046. doi: 10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative–propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalkorale, K., Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2010). Mechanisms of group membership and exemplar exposure effects on implicit attitudes. Social Psychology, 41, 158–168. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 410–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2014). Measures of implicit attitudes may conceal differences in implicit associations: The case of antiaging bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 271–278. doi: 10.1177/1948550613499239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9
   Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, D. W., Arnold, N. R., & Arnold, D. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 264–284. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0869-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Van Dessel, P., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2019). A comparative analysis of different evaluative learning procedures. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Examining the contributions of memory-dependent and memory-independent components to evaluative conditioning via instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., Sweldens, S., Stahl, C., Unkelbach, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 539–557. doi: 10.1037/a0026477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi: 10.1037/a0028347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Connelly, S. L. (1994). Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9, 103–112. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.9.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 7–31. doi: 10.1007/s11336-004-1188-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75, 70–98. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Repeated evaluative pairings and evaluative statements: How effectively do they shift implicit attitudes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 194–213. doi: 10.1037/xge0000239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. R., & Rydell, R. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model: A dual-systems approach to attitudes. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 204–217). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the implicit association test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 45–69. doi: 10.1037/a0030734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., Anderson, N. E., & Lovibond, P. F. (2003). Measuring evaluative conditioning using the implicit association test. Learning and Motivation, 34, 203–217. doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., & Bishara, A. J. (2009). An integrative review of process dissociation and related models in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 272–314. doi: 10.1080/10463280903162177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phills, C. E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197–210. doi: 10.1037/a0022159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995–1008. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W. (2006). Clearing up some misconceptions about the Quad model. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 269–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1703_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J., & Groom, C. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314–335. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W., Krieglmeyer, R., & Calanchini, J. (2014). Process models require process measures. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 121–138). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. T., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Consider the source: Persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Smith, C. T. (2015). Instruction-based approach–avoidance effects: Changing stimulus evaluation via the mere instruction to approach or avoid stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62, 161–169. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Smith, C. T., & De Schryver, M. (2016). Instructing implicit processes: When instructions to approach or avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Gawronski, B., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Mechanisms underlying approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation: Results of a preregistered adversarial collaboration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2018). How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi:10.1177/1088868318795730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Mertens, G., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2017). The mere exposure instruction effect: Mere exposure instructions influence liking. Experimental Psychology, 64, 299–314. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Mertens, G., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2019). Mere exposure effects on implicit stimulus evaluation: The moderating role of evaluation task, number of stimulus presentations, and memory for presentation frequency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 447–460. doi:10.1177/0146167218789065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815–827. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. J. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B., Markus, H., & Wilson, W. R. (1974). Exposure effects and associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 248–263.
   Google Scholar