478
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of valenced verbal information on implicit and explicit evaluation: the role of information diagnosticity, primacy, and memory cueing

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 74-85 | Received 15 Jun 2018, Accepted 10 Mar 2019, Published online: 19 Mar 2019

References

  • Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 789–843). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi: 10.1037/h0055756
  • Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York: Delcorte Press.
  • Brannon, S. M., & Gawronski, B. (2017). A second chance for first impressions? Exploring the context (in)dependent updating of implicit evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 275–283. doi: 10.1177/1948550616673875
  • Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350. doi: 10.1177/1088868312440047
  • Cone, J., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 37–57. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000014
  • Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In James M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 131–199). Burlington: Academic Press.
  • Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2018). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude models. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi:10.1177/1088868318763261
  • De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12111
  • De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 252–287. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
  • De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
  • De Schryver, M., Hughes, S., Rosseel, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2015). Unreliable yet still replicable: A comment on LeBel and Paunonen (2011). Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01896
  • Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
  • Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2009). When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338. doi: 10.1080/10463280802556958
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2019). Attitudes and the implicit-explicit dualism. In D. Albarracín & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes. Volume 1: Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 158–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
  • Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in Persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 205–218. doi: 10.1086/209393
  • Heycke, T., Gehrmann, S., Haaf, J. M., & Stahl, C. (2018). Of two minds or one? A registered replication of Rydell et al. (2006). Cognition and Emotion, 32, 1708–1727. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1429389
  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
  • Hu, X., Gawronski, B., & Balas, R. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(43), 17–32. doi: 10.1177/0146167216673351
  • Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
  • Mandelbaum, E. (2016). Attitude, inference, association: On the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs, 50, 629–658. doi: 10.1111/nous.12089
  • Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 823–849. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000021
  • Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.004
  • McConnell, A. R., & Rydell, R. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model: A dual-systems approach to attitudes. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 204–217). New York: Guilford.
  • Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/h0049330
  • Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the implicit association test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653
  • Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16
  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
  • Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the implicit association test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139
  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  • Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995–1008. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
  • Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2015). Hooked on a feeling: affective anti-smoking messages are more effective than cognitive messages at changing implicit evaluations of smoking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1488.
  • Smith, C. T., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. (2013). Consider the source. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374
  • Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2007). Affective priming of non-affective semantic categorization responses. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 44–53. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.44
  • Van Dessel, P., Cone, J., Gast, A., & De Houwer, J. (2018). The important role of memory processes in implicit evaluation. Manuscript in preparation. Retrieved from https://osf.io/2by8c/
  • Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Smith, C. T., & De Schryver, M. (2016). Instructing implicit processes: When instructions to approach or Avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.002
  • Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2018). How Do Actions influence Attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of Action Performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi:10.1177/1088868318795730
  • Van Dessel, P., Ye, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2019). Changing deep-rooted implicit evaluation in the blink of an eye: Negative verbal information shifts automatic liking of Gandhi. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 266–273. doi: 10.1177/1948550617752064
  • Wyer, N. A. (2016). Easier done than undone … by some of the people, some of the time: The role of elaboration in explicit and implicit group preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.12.006
  • Zhou, H., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How Unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (Yet False) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 493–504. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000056

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.