Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: the role of similarity construction

References

• Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Crombez, G., & Van den Bergh, O. (1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90136-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760–773. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude models. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 161–189. doi: 10.1177/1088868318763261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443–451. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional Models of Evaluative Conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3). doi: 10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59(4), 228–239. doi: 10.1037/h0087478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A.B., Rothermund, K., & De Houwer, J. (2013). Affective compatibility between stimuli and response goals: a primer for a new implicit measure of attitudes. PLoS One, 8(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2010). When old and frail is not the same. Dissociating category-based and stimulus-based influences on compatibility effects in four implicit measurement methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 479–498. doi: 10.1080/17470210903049963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, M. R., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1997–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, D., Vansteenwegen, D., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (2002). Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: affective priming as an indirect and inobtrusive measure of conditioned stimulus valence. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(3), 217–234. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00006-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Gawronski, B., & Balas, R. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-Occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1177/0146167216673351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (1990). Designing experiments and analysing data: A model comparison perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the Contributions of Associations and Recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL Model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 45–69. doi: 10.1037/a0030734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object-valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27(4), 743–752. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.732040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2017). The effect of the validity of co-occurrence on automatic and deliberate evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 708–723. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Cheng, S. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2009). Eliminating the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84–98. doi: 10.1080/17470210701822975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 995–1008. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Mackie, D. M., & Strain, L. M. (2006). Of Two Minds. Forming and Changing Valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17(11), 954–958. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01811.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (2007). Paradigms we live by. A plea for more basic research on the IAT. In B. Wittenbrink, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 195–215). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar