Are there two independent evaluative conditioning effects in relational paradigms? Dissociating the effects of CS-US pairings and their meaning

References

• Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). My friends are all alike — the relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 103–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2017). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bading, K., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2019). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition & Emotion. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1992). The content of learning in human evaluative conditioning: Acquired valence is sensitive to US-revaluation. Learning and Motivation, 23(2), 200–224. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90018-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In J. R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 161–189. doi: 10.1177/1088868318763261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Pleyers, G., & Mussweiler, T. (2009). Beyond awareness and resources: Evaluative conditioning may be sensitive to processing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 279–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2006). Using the implicit association test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37(2), 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förderer, S., & Unkelbach, C. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition & Emotion, 26(3), 534–540. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.588687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2014). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Operating principles and operating conditions of evaluation. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 188–203). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, D. W., Arnold, N. R., & Arnold, D. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 264–284. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0869-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Gawronski, B., & Balas, R. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1177/0146167216673351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., & Klauer, K. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 116–159. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1212966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., & Sweldens, S. (2018). Dissociating controllable and uncontrollable effects of affective stimuli on attitudes and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 320–349. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucx124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., Sweldens, S., Stahl, C., Unkelbach, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 539–557. doi: 10.1037/a0026477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513–541. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 7–31. doi: 10.1007/s11336-004-1188-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75(1), 70–98. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levey, A. B., & Martin, I. (1975). Classical conditioning of human ‘evaluative’ responses. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 13(4), 221–226. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(75)90026-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition & Emotion, 27(4), 743–752. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.732040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Processing goals moderate the effect of co-occurrence on automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). The assimilative effect of co-occurrence on evaluation above and beyond the effect of relational qualifiers. Social Cognition, 34(5), 435–461. doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Cheng, M. C., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect missatribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retreived from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318–339. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., & Aust, F. (2018). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.20-2. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
   Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2013). MPRinr: Analysis of multinomial processing tree models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 560–575. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0259-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweldens, S., Tuk, M. A., & Hütter, M. (2017). How to study consciousness in consumer research. A commentary on Williams and Poehlman. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 266–275. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucx044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., & Fiedler, K. (2016). Contrastive CS-US relations reverse evaluative conditioning effects. Social Cognition, 34(5), 413–434. doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar