Retrieval cues fail to influence contextualized evaluations

References

• Balaz, M. A., Capra, S., Hartl, P., & Miller, R. R. (1981). Contextual potentiation of acquired behavior after devaluing direct context-US associations. Learning and Motivation, 12(4), 383–397. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(81)90001-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 80–99. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouton, M. E. (2010). The multiple forms of context in associative learning. In B. Mesquita, L. Feldman-Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 233–258). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, S. M., & Gawronski, B. (2018). In search of a negativity bias in expectancy violation. Social Cognition, 36(2), 199–220. doi: 10.1521/soco.2018.36.2.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20(4), 366–379. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.20.4.366
   Google Scholar
• Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 131–199. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibbets, P., Havermans, R., & Arntz, A. (2008). All we need is a cue to remember: The effect of an extinction cue on renewal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(9), 1070–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibbets, P., Moor, C., & Voncken, M. J. (2013). The effect of a retrieval cue on the return of spider fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(4), 361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Hu, X., Rydell, R. J., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, J. (2015). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation revisited: A meta-analysis of successful and failed replications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), e50–e64. doi: 10.1037/xge0000079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., De Houwer, J., Brannon, S. M., Ye, Y., Vervliet, B., & Hu, X. (2018). Contextualized attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–52. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, J. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 683–701. doi: 10.1037/a0020315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Sherman, J. W., & Trope, Y. (2014). Two of what? In B. Gawronski, J. W. Sherman, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Ye, Y., Rydell, R. J., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Formation, representation, and activation of contextualized attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 188–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 69–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J. E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765–1785. doi: 10.1037/a0036260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood, A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2014). Sticky prospects: Loss frames are cognitively stickier than gain frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 376–385. doi: 10.1037/a0032310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcshane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory-testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1048–1063. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucw085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott, T. D. (2012). Advances in meta-analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Quezada, V. E., Laborda, M. A., Díaz, M. C., Navarro, V. M., Mallea, J., Repetto, P., … Betancourt, R. (2018). Extinction cues do not reduce recovery of extinguished conditioned fear in humans. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 18(1), 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randich, A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 523–548. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). From direct and indirect measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black, & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: Current research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2007). Expectancy. In A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, J. M., Todd, T. P., & Bouton, M. E. (2013). Context change and associative learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 237–244. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. doi: 10.1037/h0020071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2010). Two roles of the context in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36(2), 268–280. doi: 10.1037/a0017298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2014). The functions of contexts in associative learning. Behavioural Processes, 104, 2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenwegen, D., Vervliet, B., Hermans, D., Beckers, T., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (2006). Stronger renewal in human fear conditioning when tested with an acquisition retrieval cue than with an extinction retrieval cue. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1717–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar