Testing a computational model of subjective well-being: a preregistered replication of Rutledge et al. (2014)

References

• Bennett, D., Davidson, G., & Niv, Y. (2020, August 3). A model of mood as integrated advantage. https://10.31234/osf.io/y2vzu.
   Google Scholar
• Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–305). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvier, B., Pavani, J.-B., Le Vigouroux, S., Kop, J.-L., & Congard, A. (2019). The interactive effect of neuroticism and extraversion on the daily variability of affective states. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revisiting the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed diener (pp. 67–100). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2006a). Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: What it can and cannot do. Technometrics, 48(3), 432–435. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017005000000661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006b). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A. (1972). The psychophysiological nature of introversion-extraversion: A modification of eysenck’s theory. In V. D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray (Eds.), The biological bases of individual behaviour (pp. 182–205). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and stan. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E. M., Rogers, R. G., & Wadsworth, T. (2015). Happiness and longevity in the United States. Social Sciences & Medicine, 145, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
   Google Scholar
• Lyobomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214112469808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyobomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi, S., Diener, E., Choi, D.-W., Kim-Prieto, C., & Choi, I. (2007). The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: When less is more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papousek, I., Nauschnegg, K., Paechter, M., Lackner, H. K., Goswami, N., & Schulter, G. (2010). Trait and state positive affect and cardiovascular recovery from experimental academic stress. Biological Psychology, 83(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j_biopsycho.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge, R. B., Skandali, N., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(33), 12252–12257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407535111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 61–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. (2018). RStan: The R interface to Stan. http://mc-stan.org.
   Google Scholar
• Thake, J., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). Neuroticism, BIS, and reactivity to discrete negative mood inductions. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: Effects of happiness on physical health and consequences for preventive health care. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10908-006-9042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar