We like it ‘cause you take it: vicarious effects of approach/avoidance behaviours on observers

References

• Bading, K., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Crombez, G., & Houwer, J. D. (2001). On the role of beliefs in observational flavor conditioning. Current Psychology, 20(2), 183–203. doi:10.1007/s12144-001-1026-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (1996). Observational conditioning of food valence in humans. Appetite, 27(3), 235–250. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Pogacar, R., Pullig, C., Kouril, M., Aguilar, S., LaBouff, J., Isenberg, N., & Chakroff, A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2194–2208. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champely, S. (2020). Pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., de Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453–500. doi:10.1037/bul0000143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. doi:10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–21. doi:10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The implicit association test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(4), 228–239. doi:10.1037/h0087478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Van Dessel, P., & Moran, T. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 127–183). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviours (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B. (2004). Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 183–217. doi:10.1080/10463280440000026
   Google Scholar
• Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus–response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 855–865. doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02058-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 733–740. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. doi:10.3102/1076998600600210
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Ye, Y., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (2019). When people co-occur with good or bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 196–208. doi:10.1177/0146167218781340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey, I., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Implicit association test as an analogical learning task. Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 272–285. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. In L. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60107-0
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasran, S., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2022). Observational evaluative conditioning is sensitive to relational information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(11). https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221080471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957–971. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. doi:10.1177/2515245918810225
   Google Scholar
• Kupfer, T. R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2017). Communicating moral motives: The social signaling function of disgust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 632–640. doi:10.1177/1948550616679236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., Wheeler, M., & Levis, B. (2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition & Emotion, 28(6), 1119–1126. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.867833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2020). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437. doi:10.1037/a0028085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 45–69. doi:10.1037/a0030734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2014). Indirect measures as a signal for evaluative change. Cognition & Emotion, 28(2), 208–229. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.810145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phills, C. E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 197–210. doi:10.1037/a0022159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 239–245. doi:10.1037/h0047274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 915–926. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, D. W., & Ong, D. (2021). Learning from agentic actions: Modelling causal inference from intention. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch, K., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach–avoid training. Cognition & Emotion, 25(7), 1311–1330. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Smith, C. T. (2015). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects. Changing stimulus evaluation via the mere instruction to approach or avoid stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 161–169. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Smith, C. T., & De Schryver, M. (2016). Instructing implicit processes: When instructions to approach or avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Eder, A. B., & Hughes, S. (2018). Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1224–1241. doi:10.1037/xlm0000514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2019). How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 267–284. doi:10.1177/1088868318795730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogmaister, C., Perugini, M., & Richetin, J. (2016). Motivation modulates the effect of approach on implicit preferences. Cognition & Emotion, 30(5), 890–911. doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1032892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar