Rumination and inhibition in task switching: no evidence for an association

References

• Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2020). Papaja: Prepare reproducible APA journal articles with R Markdown. https://github.com/crsh/papaja
   Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Rector, N. A., Bacchiochi, J. R., & McBride, C. (2004). The stability of the response styles questionnaire rumination scale in a sample of patients with major depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000045562.17228.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. (2020). Tinylabels: Lightweight variable labels. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tinylabels
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2019). Matrix: Sparse and dense matrix classes and methods. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). Psychological Corportation.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
   Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon's mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS One, 8(3), e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daches, S., & Mor, N. (2014). Training ruminators to inhibit negative information: A preliminary report. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9585-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. (2021). Faux: Simulation for factorial designs. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2669586
   Google Scholar
• De Lissnyder, E., Koster, E. H. W., Derakshan, N., & De Raedt, R. (2010). The association between depressive symptoms and executive control impairments in response to emotional and non-emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903378354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozois, D. J. A., Dobson, K. S., & Ahnberg, J. L. (1998). A psychometric evaluation of the beck depression inventory–II. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddelbuettel, D., & Balamuta, J. J. (2018). Extending R with C++: A brief introduction to Rcpp. The American Statistician, 72(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddelbuettel, D., & François, R. (2011). Rcpp: seamless R and C++ integration. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 133(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganor, T., Mor, N., & Huppert, J. D. (2023). Effects of rumination and distraction on inhibition. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 78, 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101780
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing type s (sign) and type m (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorfein, D. S., & MacLeod, C. M. (2007). Inhibition in cognition. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, J. A. (2018a). Does task activation in task switching influence inhibition or episodic interference? Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, J. A. (2018b). Trimr: An implementation of common response time trimming methods. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trimr/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2014). Task switching and cognitive control. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, J. A., Kedra, P., & Walker, A. (2019). The effect of practice on inhibition in task switching: Controlling for episodic retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 192, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O'Loughlin, R. (2017). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1568–1583. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D. M., Mills, A. C., Judah, M. R., & White, E. J. (2021). State and trait effects of rumination on inhibitory processes in memory. Current Psychology, 40(10), 4875–4883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00432-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, L., & Wickham, H. (2020). Purrr: Functional programming tools. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=purrr
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1-2), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joormann, J. (2005). Inhibition, rumination, and mood regulation in depression. In D. N. McIntosh, G. Sedek, R. W. Engle, & U. von Hecker (Eds.), Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology (pp. 275–312). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joormann, J. (2006). Differential effects of rumination and dysphoria on the inhibition of irrelevant emotional material: Evidence from a negative priming task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9035-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joormann, J., & Quinn, M. E. (2014). Cognitive processes and emotion regulation in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 31(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.2014.31.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joormann, J., & Tran, T. B. (2009). Rumination and intentional forgetting of emotional material. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802416735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, M. (2020). tidybayes: Tidy data and geoms for Bayesian models. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1308151
   Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., De Lissnyder, E., Derakshan, N., & De Raedt, R. (2011). Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: The impaired disengagement hypothesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, A. W., & Grange, J. A. (2019). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: A diffusion model analysis. Psychological Research, 84(7), 1965–1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01206-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018). The bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 178–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109(2), 376–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108(2), 393–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., & Wickham, H. (2021). Tibble: Simple data frames. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tibble
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). ‘Thanks for sharing that’: Ruminators and their social support networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, T. L. (2020). Patchwork: The composer of plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500423269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., Watkins, E. R., & Wills, A. J. (2016). Does rumination cause ‘inhibitory’ deficits? Psychopathology Review, 4(3), 341–376. https://doi.org/10.5127/pr.036914
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). Why most studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks are bound to fail. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5
   Google Scholar
• Scheil, J., & Kleinsorge, T. (2019). Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n–2 repetition costs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818762087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, N. J., & Cooper, R. P. (2017). Task inhibition, conflict, and the n–2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach. Cognitive Psychology, 94, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
   Google Scholar
• Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS (4th ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Krypotos, A.-M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after Loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmer, A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2011). Brooding and reflection reconsidered: A factor analytic examination of rumination in currently depressed, formerly depressed, and never depressed individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9361-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2007). Inhibition versus switching deficits in different forms of rumination. Psychological Science, 18(6), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01936.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmer, A. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2012). Switching and backward inhibition in major depressive disorder: The role of rumination. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 570��578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmer, A. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2013). An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1036–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2019). Stringr: Simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2020). Forcats: Tools for working with categorical variables (factors). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=forcats
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2021). Tidyr: Tidy messy data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., & Kuhn, M. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2021). Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Hester, J., & Francois, R. (2018). Readr: Read rectangular text data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Cao, S., Shields, G. S., Teng, Z., & Liu, Y. (2017). The relationships between rumination and core executive functions: A meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 34(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.2017.34.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetsche, U., Bürkner, P.-C., & Schulze, L. (2018). Shedding light on the association between repetitive negative thinking and deficits in cognitive control – a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 63, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetsche, U., D'Avanzato, C., & Joormann, J. (2012). Depression and rumination: Relation to components of inhibition. Cognition and Emotion, 26(4), 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.613919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar