How emotions are metaphorically embodied: measuring hand and head action strengths of typical emotional states

References

• Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200738
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chedid, G., Brambati, S. M., Bedetti, C., Rey, A. E., Wilson, M. A., & Vallet, G. T. (2019). Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavioral Research Method, 51(5), 2094–2105. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01254-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I. H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C. R. (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLoS ONE, 14(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). I see/hear what you mean: Semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R. H. (2021). Are metaphors embodied? The neural evidence. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2417–2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01604-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, F. R., Frey, D., Arana, S., von Saldern, S., Picht, T., Vajkoczy, P., & Pulvermüller, F. (2015). Is the motor system necessary for processing action and abstract emotion words? Evidence from focal brain lesions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipović Đurđević, D. F., Popović Stijačić, M., & Karapandžić, J. (2016). A quest for sources of perceptual richness: Several candidates. In S. Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martínez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in language and mind (pp. 187–238). Novi Sad, Serbia: Filozofski fakultet uNovom Sadu.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, G., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2006a). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horchak, O. V., Giger, J. C., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). Simulation of metaphorical actions and discourse comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.859045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O., Farsani, D., & Reali, F. (2022). A study of using metaphoric and beat gestures with motion-based and non-motion-based metaphors during retelling stories. Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2008). Metaphor and emotion. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–396). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2013). The metaphor–metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.76849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landmann, H., Cova, F., & Hess, U. (2019). Being moved by meaningfulness: Appraisals of surpassing internal standards elicit being moved by relationships and achievements. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1387–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1567463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster sensorimotor norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, A., Wauthia, E., Lefebvre, L., Ris, L., & Simoes Loureiro, I. (2021). Perceptual and interoceptive strength norms for 270 French words. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: Modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1634–1647. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002–1005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2007). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omori, A. (2008). Emotion as a huge mass of moving water. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480801944277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçalışkan, Ş. (2007). Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701235429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, L. D. (2008). X IS A JOURNEY: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(3), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802223085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R. (2007). High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 33–51). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, L., Hothorn, T., Stauffer, R., & Zeileis, A. (2019). Distributional regression forests for probabilistic precipitation forecasting in complex terrain. Annals of Applied Statistics, 13(3), 1564–1589. https://doi.org/10.1214/19-AOAS1247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. W., Zickfeld, J. H., Seibt, B., & Fiske, A. P. (2018). Moment-to-moment changes in feeling moved match changes in closeness, tears, goosebumps, and warmth: Time series analyses. Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1268998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2204–2218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos, M. D., Rigby, R. A., & Bastiani, F. D. (2018). GAMLSS: A distributional regression approach. Statistical Modelling, 18(3–4), 248–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X18759144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strick, M., & van Soolingen, J. (2017). Against the odds: Human values arising in unfavorable circumstances elicit the feeling of being moved. Cognition and Emotion, 32(6), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.139572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, N. Y. (2006). Metaphor and coupling: An embodied, action-oriented perspective. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (2022). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (5th ed.). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphors and subjective experience: Motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves—moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness, and language (pp. 423–450). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar