1,522
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Phasic affective signals by themselves do not regulate cognitive control

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 650-665 | Received 20 Jun 2022, Accepted 10 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 Apr 2023

References

  • Aczel, B., Kovacs, M., Bognar, M., Palfi, B., Hartanto, A., Onie, S., Tiong, L. E., & Evans, T. R. (2021). Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan et al. (2013). Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 191353. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191353
  • Berger, A., Mitschke, V., Dignath, D., Eder, A., & van Steenbergen, H. (2020). The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 57(4), e13524. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13524
  • Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.356
  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
  • Braem, S., Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2014). What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1134.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134
  • Cohen, J. D. (2017). Cognitive control: Core constructs and current considerations. In T. Egner (Ed.), The wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 3–28). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118920497.ch1
  • Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Mor, N. (2011). Can emotion modulate attention? Evidence for reciprocal links in the attentional network test. Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000083
  • Dienes, Z., & Mclatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z
  • Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9
  • Dignath, D., Janczyk, M., & Eder, A. (2017). Phasic valence and arousal do not influence post-conflict adjustments in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 174, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.004
  • Dimberg, U. (1990). Facial electromyographic reactions and autonomic activity to auditory stimuli. Biological Psychology, 31(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(90)90013-M
  • Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2011). If it’s hard to read … try harder! processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments. Psychological Research, 75(5), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0319-y
  • Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.003
  • Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569569
  • Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001
  • Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
  • Erb, C. D., & Aschenbrenner, A. J. (2019). Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks. Acta Psychologica, 198, 102869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102869
  • Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
  • Fröber, K., Stürmer, B., Frömer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). The role of affective evaluation in conflict adaptation: An LRP study. Brain and Cognition, 116, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.05.003
  • Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017598
  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 121(4), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
  • Gyurkovics, M., Kovacs, M., Jaquiery, M., Palfi, B., Dechterenko, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Registered replication report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(8), 3777–3787. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02021-2
  • Kan, I. P., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Drummey, A. B., Nutile, L., Krupa, L., & Novick, J. M. (2013). To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control. Cognition, 129(3), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.001
  • Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Emotion triggers executive attention: Anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task. Human Brain Mapping, 32(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21012
  • Landman, L. L., & van Steenbergen, H. (2020). Emotion and conflict adaptation: The role of phasic arousal and self-relevance. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1722615
  • Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00078
  • Lee, J., & Cho, Y. S. (2013). Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: Evidence for dimension-specific modulation. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.013
  • Li, W., Jiang, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Zhou, Z., Jorgensen, N., Li, X., & Li, C. (2014). Positive and negative emotions modulate attention allocation in color-flanker task processing: Evidence from event related potentials. Motivation and Emotion, 38(3), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9387-9
  • Morsella, E., Gray, J. R., Krieger, S. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The essence of conscious conflict: Subjective effects of sustaining incompatible intentions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 9(5), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017121
  • Padmala, S., Bauer, A., & Pessoa, L. (2011). Negative emotion impairs conflict-driven executive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00192
  • Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006
  • Schiltenwolf, M., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2022). No temporal decay of cognitive control in the congruency sequence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001159
  • Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). The Guilford Press.
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
  • van Steenbergen, H. (2015). Affective modulation of cognitive control: A biobehavioral perspective. In G. H. E. Gendolla, M. Tops, & S. L. Koole (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 89–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_7
  • van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1473–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x
  • van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1629–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385951
  • Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., González-García, C., Hoofs, V., Notebaert, W., & Braem, S. (2020). Shared neural representations of cognitive conflict and negative affect in the medial frontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(45), 8715–8725. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-20.2020
  • Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, Y. (2014). Suppression (but Not reappraisal) impairs subsequent error detection: An ERP study of emotion regulation’s resource-depleting effect. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e96339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096339
  • Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 2022–2037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037454
  • Yang, Q., & Pourtois, G. (2018). Conflict-driven adaptive control is enhanced by integral negative emotion on a short time scale. Cognition and Emotion, 32(8), 1637–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1434132
  • Zeng, Q., Qi, S., Li, M., Yao, S., Ding, C., & Yang, D. (2017). Enhanced conflict-driven cognitive control by emotional arousal, not by valence. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1189882