282
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Higher judgements of learning for emotional words: processing fluency or memory beliefs?

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 714-730 | Received 26 Apr 2022, Accepted 25 Mar 2023, Published online: 06 Apr 2023

References

  • Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. K. (2019). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioural experiment builder. Behavioral Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
  • Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
  • Castel, A. D. (2008). Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.429
  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage Publications.
  • Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1026
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Faulkenberry, T. J., & Brennan, K. (2022). PsyStat [Computer software]. https://tomfaulkenberry.shinyapps.io/psystat.
  • Frank, D., & Kuhlmann, B. J. (2017). More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000332
  • Hourihan, K. L., Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2017). The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0646-3
  • Hu, X., Li, T., Zheng, J., Su, N., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2015). How much do metamemory beliefs contribute to the font-size effect in judgments of learning? PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142351
  • Hu, X., Zheng, J., Fan, T., Su, N., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2020). Using multilevel mediation model to measure the contribution of beliefs to judgments of learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 637–656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00637
  • Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Emotional memory across the adult lifespan. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887691.
  • Kissler, J., & Herbert, C. (2013). Emotion, Etmnooi, or Emitoon? – Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.004
  • Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
  • Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187
  • Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1133
  • Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: Overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017350
  • Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The ease-of-processing heuristic and the stability bias. Psychological Science, 22(6), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407929
  • Levine, L. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition & Emotion, 23(5), 833–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902738863
  • Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1263
  • McDonough, I. M., & Gallo, D. A. (2012). Illusory expectations can affect retrieval-monitoring accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025548
  • Mendes, P. S., Luna, K., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2021). Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs. Journal of General Psychology, 148(2), 124–148.
  • Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.007
  • Nomi, J. S., Rhodes, M. G., & Cleary, A. M. (2013). Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition. Cognition & Emotion, 27(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.679917
  • Pierce, B. H., & Kensinger, E. A. (2011). Effects of emotion on associative recognition: Valence and retention interval matter. Emotion, 11(1), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021287
  • Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013684
  • Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 550–554. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.550
  • Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28
  • Su, N., Li, T., Zheng, J., Hu, X., Fan, T., & Luo, L. (2018). How font size affects judgements of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory. PLoS ONE, 13, e0200888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200888
  • Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Can older adults accurately judge their learning of emotional information? Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028447
  • Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J., Urry, H. L., & Opitz, P. C. (2017). The effects of emotion on younger and older adults’ monitoring of learning. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(5), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2016.1227423
  • Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
  • Undorf, M., & Bröder, A. (2020). Cue integration in metamemory judgments is strategic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 629–642.
  • Undorf, M., Söllner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6
  • Undorf, M., & Zimdahl, M. F. (2019). Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000571
  • Undorf, M., Zimdahl, M. F., & Bernstein, D. M. (2017). Perceptual fluency contributes to effects of stimulus size on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.003
  • Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2017). The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs. Memory & Cognition, 45(4), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0681-0
  • Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2018). Monitoring of learning for emotional faces: How do fine-grained categories of emotion influence participants’ judgments of learning and beliefs about memory? Cognition and Emotion, 32(4), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1360252
  • Witherby, A. E., Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Why do emotional stimuli influence judgments of learning? Theory, evidence, and future directions. In D. Moraitou, & P. Metallidou (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research across the life span: A tribute to anastasis efklides (pp. 3–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51673-4_1.
  • Yang, C., Yu, R., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Huang, T. (2021). How to assess the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs to the formation of judgments of learning: Methods and pitfalls. Metacognition and Learning, 16(2), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09254-4
  • Zimmerman, C. A., & Kelley, C. M. (2010). “I’ll remember this!” Effects of emotionality on memory predictions versus memory performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.