150
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Studying trait-characteristics and neural correlates of the emotional ego- and altercentric bias using an audiovisual paradigm

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 818-834 | Received 18 Oct 2022, Accepted 24 Apr 2023, Published online: 18 May 2023

References

  • Albert, S., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2018). Improving human interaction research through ecological grounding. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.132
  • Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/speakUnspeakPraat_glot2001.pdf.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
  • Bukowski, H., Tik, M., Silani, G., Ruff, C. C., Windischberger, C., & Lamm, C. (2020). When differences matter: rTMS/fMRI reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy. Cortex, 128, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.009
  • Bukowski, H., Todorova, B., Boch, M., Silani, G., & Lamm, C. (2021). Socio-cognitive training impacts emotional and perceptual self-salience but not self-other distinction. Acta Psychologica, 216), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103297
  • Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
  • Chen, L.-C., Sandmann, P., Thorne, J. D., Herrmann, C. S., & Debener, S. (2015). Association of concurrent fNIRS and EEG signatures in response to auditory and visual stimuli. Brain Topography, 28(5), 710–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-015-0424-8
  • Cohen, M. X. (2014). Analyzing neural time series data. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9609.001.0001
  • Cohen, M. X., & Donner, T. H. (2013). Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(12), 2752–2763. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00479.2013
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85–104.
  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
  • Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
  • Hartmann, H., Lengersdorff, L., Hitz, H. H., Stepnicka, P., & Silani, G. (2022). Emotional Ego- and altercentric biases in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.813969
  • Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
  • Hoffmann, F., Banzhaf, C., Kanske, P., Gärtner, M., Bermpohl, F., & Singer, T. (2016a). Empathy in depression: Egocentric and altercentric biases and the role of alexithymia. Journal of Affective Disorders, 199, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.007
  • Hoffmann, F., Koehne, S., Steinbeis, N., Dziobek, I., & Singer, T. (2016b). Preserved self-other distinction during empathy in autism is linked to network integrity of right supramarginal gyrus. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2609-0
  • Janke, S., & Glöckner-Rist, A. (2012). Deutsche version der positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Zusammenstellung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Items Und Skalen (ZIS), https://doi.org/10.6102/zis146
  • Lamm, C., Bukowski, H., & Silani, G. (2016). From shared to distinct self-other representations in empathy: Evidence from neurotypical function and socio-cognitive disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686)), https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0083
  • Lutz, J. (2016). The validity of crowdsourcing data in studying anger and aggressive behavior. Social Psychology, 47(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000256
  • Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
  • Parsons, S., Kruijt, A. W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919879695
  • Paulus, C. (2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363/
  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
  • Pion-Tonachini, L., Kreutz-Delgado, K., & Makeig, S. (2019). ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. NeuroImage, 198, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026
  • Pronizius, E., Bukowski, H., & Lamm, C. (2022). Self-other distinction across motor, cognitive, and affective representations is neither unitary nor domain-general. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b2pv9
  • Riva, F., Triscoli, C., Lamm, C., Carnaghi, A., & Silani, G. (2016). Emotional egocentricity bias across the life-span. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00074
  • Silani, G., Lamm, C., Ruff, C. C., & Singer, T. (2013). Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(39), 15466–15476. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-13.2013
  • Spss Inc. Released 2013. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp.
  • Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007
  • Team, R. C. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Tomova, L., Von Dawans, B., Heinrichs, M., Silani, G., & Lamm, C. (2014). Is stress affecting our ability to tune into others? Evidence for gender differences in the effects of stress on self-other distinction. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 43, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.02.006
  • Trilla, I., Weigand, A., & Dziobek, I. (2021). Affective states influence emotion perception: evidence for emotional egocentricity. Psychological Research, 85, 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01314-3
  • von Mohr, M., Finotti, G., Ambroziak, K. B., & Tsakiris, M. (2020). Do you hear what I see? An audio-visual paradigm to assess emotional egocentricity bias. Cognition and Emotion, 34(4), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1683516
  • Walfish, S. (2006). A review of statistical outlier methods. Pharmaceutical Technology, 30(11).
  • Yang, W., Makita, K., Nakao, T., Kanayama, N., Machizawa, M. G., Sasaoka, T., Sugata, A., Kobayashi, R., Hiramoto, R., Yamawaki, S., Iwanaga, M., & Miyatani, M. (2018). Affective auditory stimulus database: An expanded version of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-E). Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1415–1429. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1027-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.