1,854
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Articles

Emotions, fast and slow: processing of emotion words is affected by individual differences in need for affect and narrative absorption

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 997-1005 | Received 24 Oct 2022, Accepted 15 May 2023, Published online: 26 May 2023

References

  • Appel, M., Gnambs, T., & Maio, G. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.666921
  • Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213261003799847
  • Arfé, B., Delatorre, P., & Mason, L. (2022). Effects of negative emotional valence on readers’ text processing and memory for text: An eye-tracking study. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10362-7
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Eekhof, L. S., Kuijpers, M. M., Faber, M., Gao, X., Mak, M., van den Hoven, E., & Willems, R. M. (2021). Lost in a story, detached from the words. Discourse Processes, 58(7), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1857619
  • Eekhof, L. S., van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Willems, R. M. (2021). Reading minds, reading stories: Social-cognitive abilities affect the linguistic processing of narrative viewpoint. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 698986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698986
  • Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8(4), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012887
  • Gao, C., Shinkareva, S. V., & Peelen, M. V. (2022). Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001176
  • Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M. R., & Tan, L.-C. (2016). Semantic richness effects in spoken word recognition: A lexical decision and semantic categorization megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976
  • Haddock, G., Maio, G. R., Arnold, K., & Huskinson, T. (2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208314871
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Sentiment analysis for words and fiction characters from the perspective of computational (neuro-)poetics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00053
  • Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2019). Computing the affective-aesthetic potential of literary texts. AI, 1(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1010002
  • Kauschke, C., Bahn, D., Vesker, M., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). The role of emotional valence for the processing of facial and verbal stimuli – positivity or negativity bias? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01654
  • Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
  • Knickerbocker, H., Johnson, R. L., & Altarriba, J. (2015). Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing. Cognition and Emotion, 29(5), 784–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.938023
  • Koopman, E. M. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
  • Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
  • Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
  • Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  • Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot – data visualization for statistics in social science. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2400856
  • Lüdtke, J., Kaakinen, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (2021). Contextual meaning-making in reading: The role of affect. In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 39–62). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645958-003
  • Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694156
  • Mueller, C. J., & Kuchinke, L. (2016). Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0408-5
  • Saarimäki, H. (2021). Naturalistic stimuli in affective neuroimaging: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.675068. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fnhum.2021.675068
  • Scott, G., O’Donnell, P., & Sereno, S. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027209
  • Silva, C., Montant, M., Ponz, A., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Emotions in reading: Disgust, empathy and the contextual learning hypothesis. Cognition, 125(2), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.013
  • Song, H., Finn, E. S., & Rosenberg, M. D. (2021). Neural signatures of attentional engagement during narratives and its consequences for event memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33), e2021905118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021905118
  • Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
  • Usée, F., Jacobs, A. M., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). From abstract symbols to emotional (in-)sights: An eye tracking study on the effects of emotional vignettes and pictures. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00905
  • van Krieken, K., & Sanders, J. (2021). What is narrative journalism? A systematic review and an empirical agenda. Journalism, 22(6), 1393–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919862056