Articulation dynamics and evaluative conditioning: investigating the boundary conditions, mental representation, and origin of the in-out effect

References

• Amd, M. (2022). Valence generalization across nonrecurring structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 48(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000317
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bading, K., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and How It relates to attitude models. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318763261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3 SE-Review Article), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, J. A. A. (2022). The In-Out effect in the perception and production of real words. Cognitive Science, 46(9), e13193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, A. R., Franz, T. M., Phelan, L. L., & Blaine, B. E. (2013). Reducing muslim/arab stereotypes through evaluative conditioning. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.706242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, M. V., Godinho, S., & Semin, G. R. (2019). The “ins” and “outs” of person perception: The influence of consonant wanderings in judgments of warmth and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, A. (2018). A declarative memory model of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3 SE-Review Article), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28590
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2018). Evaluative conditioning from the perspective of the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3 SE-Review Article), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28024
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Quinn, K. A. (2013). Guilty by mere similarity: Assimilative effects of facial resemblance on automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2020). Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in–out preference effect. Psychological Research, 84(3), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1095-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, T., & Kuchenbrandt, D. (2017). Generalization effects in evaluative conditioning: Evidence for attitude transfer effects from single exemplars to social categories. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godinho, S., Garrido, M. V., & Horchak, O. V. (2019). Oral approach avoidance: A replication and extension for Slavic and Turkic phonations. Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godinho, S., Garrido, M. V., Zürn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2019). Oral kinematics: Examining the role of edibility and valence in the in-out effect. Cognition and Emotion, 33(5), 1094–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1532874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbeisen, G., Schneider, M., & Walther, E. (2020). Liked for their looks: Evaluative conditioning and the generalisation of conditioned attitudes in early childhood. Cognition and Emotion, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1854187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heycke, T., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Co-occurrence and relational information in evaluative learning: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högden, F., Stahl, C., & Unkelbach, C. (2020). Similarity-based and rule-based generalisation in the acquisition of attitudes via evaluative conditioning. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1588709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M. (2022). An integrative review of dual- and single-process accounts of evaluative conditioning. Nature Reviews Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00102-7
   Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., Kutzner, F., & Fiedler, K. (2014). What is learned from repeated pairings? On the scope and generalizability of evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., & Tigges, D. (2019). On the external validity of evaluative conditioning: Evaluative responses generalize to modified instances of conditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Schöne, T., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2021). Fluency in the in-out effect: The role of structural mere exposure effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., & Vogel, T. (2022a). Choosing a brand name that’s “in” – disgust sensitivity, preference for intuition, and the articulatory in-out effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., & Vogel, T. (2022b). The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by consonant preferences? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., & Vogel, T. (2023). (Why) do big five personality traits moderate evaluative conditioning? The role of US extremity and pairing memory. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 74812. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.74812
   Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Vogel, T., Maedche, A., & Wänke, M. (2023). Brand placements in video games: How local in-game experiences influence brand attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 40(2), https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Vogel, T., & Topolinski, S. (2022a). Can sequencing explain the in-out effect? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(6), 449–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Vogel, T., & Topolinski, S. (2022b). The articulatory in-out effect: Replicable, but inexplicable. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(1), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Vogel, T., & Wänke, M. (2022). The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by articulation fluency? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 99, 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurchiș, R., Costea, A., Dienes, Z., Miclea, M., & Opre, A. (2020). Evaluative conditioning of artificial grammars: Evidence that subjectively-unconscious structures bias affective evaluations of novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(9), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocsor, F., & Bereczkei, T. (2017). Evaluative conditioning leads to differences in the social evaluation of prototypical faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, A., & Rummer, R. (2021). What is preferred in the in–out effect: Articulation locations or articulation movement direction? Cognition and Emotion, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1996336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindau, B., & Topolinski, S. (2018). The articulatory in-out effect resists oral motor interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., & Weiss, D. J. (2022). Easy does it: Sequencing explains the in-out effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(6), 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschmann, I. T., Körner, A., Boecker, L., & Topolinski, S. (2020). Front in the mouth, front in the word: The driving mechanisms of the in-out effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Hughes, S., Hussey, I., Vadillo, M. A., Olson, M. A., Aust, F., Bading, K., Balas, R., Benedict, T., Corneille, O., Douglas, S. B., Ferguson, M. J., Fritzlen, K. A., Gast, A., Gawronski, B., Giménez-Fernández, T., Hanusz, K., Heycke, T., Högden, F., … De Houwer, J. (2020). Incidental attitude formation via the surveillance task: A preregistered replication of the olson and fazio (2001) study. Psychological Science, 32(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Nudler, Y., & Anan, Y. B. (2023). Evaluative conditioning: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs.
   Google Scholar
• Motoki, K., & Pathak, A. (2022). Articulatory global branding: Generalizability, modulators, and mechanisms of the in-out effect in non-WEIRD consumers. Journal of Business Research, 149, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1087–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichmann, K., Hütter, M., Kaup, B., & Ramscar, M. (2023). Variability and abstraction in evaluative conditioning: Consequences for the generalization of likes and dislikes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 108, 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (2007). Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601000581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R. R., & Topolinski, S. (2018). My username is IN! The influence of inward vs. Outward wandering usernames on judgments of online seller trustworthiness. Psychology & Marketing, 35(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2017). Articulation patterns in names: A hidden route to consumer preference. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/692820
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Bakhtiari, G. (2016). Sequential approach-avoidance movements. Social Psychology, 47(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016a). Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states: The case of oral movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1589–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016b). Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability. Appetite, 99, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Boecker, L., Löffler, C. S., Gusmão, B., & Ingendahl, M. (2022). On the emergence of the in–out effect across trials: Two items do the trick. Psychological Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01715-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., Ingendahl, M., & Winkielman, P. (2021). The architecture of prototype preferences: Typicality, fluency, and valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizak, D. M., & Reber, A. S. (2004). Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(2), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar