142
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Agency influences vicarious approach/avoidance effects

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1299-1314 | Received 17 Feb 2023, Accepted 18 Aug 2023, Published online: 19 Sep 2023

References

  • Bading, K. (2021). Does association formation contribute to evaluative conditioning? A review of current methodologies and their findings [Doctoral dissertation, Universität zu Köln].
  • Bading, K., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  • Basil, M. D. (1996). Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 478–495.
  • Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104(3), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.012
  • Carpenter, T. P., Pogacar, R., Pullig, C., Kouril, M., Aguilar, S., LaBouff, J., Isenberg, N., & Chakroff, A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2194–2208. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  • Cohen, J. (2014). Current research on fandom, parasocial relationships, and identification. In M. B. Oliver, & A. A. Raney (Eds.), Media and social life (pp. 142–156). Routledge.
  • Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude models. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318763261
  • Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25(6), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(98)90007-9
  • Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., Brown, A. S., Gray, N. S., & Snowden, R. J. (2010). Faking of the Implicit Association Test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.519236
  • De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications, 34(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024
  • De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
  • De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(4), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087478
  • De Houwer, J., Van Dessel, P., & Moran, T. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 127–183). Academic Press.
  • De Houwer, J., Van Dessel, P., & Moran, T. (2021). Attitudes as propositional representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fox, F. F. (2003). Reducing intercultural friction through fiction: virtual cultural learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00064-0
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2018). Evaluative conditioning from the perspective of the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28024
  • Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2 (pp. 283–310).
  • Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus–response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02058-4
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
  • Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
  • Holland, P. C., & Maddux, J. M. (2010). Brain systems of attention in associative learning. In C. J. Mitchell, & M. E. Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and learning (pp. 305–349). Oxford University Press.
  • Huesmann, L. R., Lagerspetz, K., & Eron, L. D. (1984). Intervening variables in the TV violence–aggression relation: Evidence from two countries. Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 746–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.5.746
  • Igartua, J. J., & Rodríguez-Contreras, L. (2020). Narrative voice matters! improving smoking prevention with testimonial messages through identification and cognitive processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197281
  • Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
  • Kasran, S., Hughes, S., & de Houwer, J. (2022). Observational evaluative conditioning is sensitive to relational information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(11), 2043–2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221080471
  • Kasran, S., Hughes, S. J., De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2023). The role of causal attributions in observational conditioning [in press]. Collabra: Psychology. Retrieved from: https://liplab.be/onewebmedia/Manuscript_observational_conditioning_attributions.pdf on June 16th, 2023.
  • Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
  • Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver’s inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672931930
  • Maccoby, E. E., & Wilson, W. C. (1957). Identification and observational learning from films. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 55, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043015
  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
  • Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2015). A thousand words are worth more than a picture? The effects of stimulus modality on the implicit association test. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061558038
  • Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180
  • Moses, L. J., Baldwin, D. A., Rosicky, J. G., & Tidball, G. (2001). Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. Child Development, 72(3), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00311
  • Oliver, M. B., Bilandzic, H., Cohen, J., Ferchaud, A., Shade, D. D., Bailey, E. J., & Yang, C. (2019). A penchant for the immoral: Implications of parasocial interaction, perceived complicity, and identification on liking of anti-heroes. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy019
  • Roberts, D. (2010). Vicarious learning: A review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.017
  • Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the implicit association test: The recoding-free implicit association test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701822975
  • Ryu, K., Lehto, X. Y., Gordon, S. E., & Fu, X. (2019). Effect of a brand story structure on narrative transportation and perceived brand image of luxury hotels. Tourism Management, 71, 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.021
  • Slater, M. D. (2002). Involvement as goal-directed strategic processing: Extending the elaboration likelihood model. In J. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 175–194). Sage.
  • Strack, F., & Hannover, B. (1996). Awareness of the influence as a precondition for implementingcorrectional goals. In P. M. Gollwitzer, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 579–596). Guilford Press.
  • Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
  • Van Dessel, P., Eder, A. B., & Hughes, S. (2018). Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000514
  • Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2019). How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318795730
  • van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, G. F., Haaf, G. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, S., Ly, A., Marsman, m., Matzke, D., Komarlu Narendra Gupta, A. R., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
  • Van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2017). Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters: A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190
  • Zhou, S., & Shapiro, M. A. (2020). Effects of egocentric projection and identification on narrative persuasion in foodborne illness messages. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1868627
  • Zogmaister, C., Brignoli, S., Martellone, A., Tuta, D., & Perugini, M. (2023). We like it cause you take it: Vicarious effects of approach-avoidance behaviours on observers. Cognition and Emotion, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2146058

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.