Investigating the relationship between self-reported interoceptive experience and risk propensity

References

• Arslan, R. C., Brümmer, M., Dohmen, T., Drewelies, J., Hertwig, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2020). How people know their risk preference. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72077-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiano, C., Santangelo, G., Senese, V. P., Di Mauro, G., Lauro, G., Piacenti, M., & Conson, M. (2021). Linking perception of bodily states and cognitive control: The role of interoception in impulsive behaviour. Experimental Brain Research, 239(3), 857–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-06022-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.2.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornemann, B., Herbert, B. M., Mehling, W. E., & Singer, T. (2015). Differential changes in self-reported aspects of interoceptive awareness through 3 months of contemplative training. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., Berner, L. A., Jones, M. D., Reilly, E. E., Cusack, A., Anderson, L. K., Kaye, W. H., & Wierenga, C. E. (2017). Psychometric evaluation and norms for the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) in a clinical eating disorders sample: Psychometric properties of the MAIA. European Eating Disorders Review, 25(5), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calì, G., Ambrosini, E., Picconi, L., Mehling, W. E., & Committeri, G. (2015). Investigating the relationship between interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive awareness, and emotional susceptibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa Silva, L., Belrose, C., Trousselard, M., Rea, B., Seery, E., Verdonk, C., Duffaud, A. M., & Verdonk, C. (2022). Self-reported body awareness: Validation of the postural awareness scale and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (version 2) in a non-clinical adult French-speaking sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 946271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., Everitt, B. J., & Bishop, D. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmedt, O., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., Murphy, J., Bird, G., & Maurage, P. (2020). Contribution of time estimation and knowledge to heartbeat counting task performance under original and adapted instructions. Biological Psychology, 154, 107904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmedt, O., Heeren, A., Corneille, O., & Luminet, O. (2022). What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach. Biological Psychology, 169, 108289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., & Corneille, O. (2018). The heartbeat counting task largely involves non-interoceptive processes: Evidence from both the original and an adapted counting task. Biological Psychology, 138, 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duell, N., Steinberg, L., Icenogle, G., Chein, J., Chaudhary, N., Di Giunta, L., Dodge, K. A., Fanti, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Oburu, P., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Tapanya, S., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Takash, H. M. S., Bacchini, D., & Chang, L. (2018). Age patterns in risk taking across the world. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0752-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 239–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekih-Romdhane, F., Malaeb, D., Fawaz, M., Chammas, N., Soufia, M., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2023). Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) questionnaire in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking adults. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 577. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05067-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeldmanHall, O., Glimcher, P., Baker, A. L., & Phelps, E. A. (2016). Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferentzi, E., Horváth, Á, & Köteles, F. (2019). Do body-related sensations make feel US better? Subjective well-being is associated only with the subjective aspect of interoception. Psychophysiology, 56(4), e13319. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferentzi, E., Olaru, G., Geiger, M., Vig, L., Köteles, F., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). Examining the factor structure and validity of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(5), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1813147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who takes risks when and why?: Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiskum, C., Eik-Nes, T. T., Abdollahpour Ranjbar, H., Andersen, J., & Habibi Asgarabad, M. (2023). Interoceptive awareness in a Norwegian population: Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) 2. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04946-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkmann, T., Scherer, A., Meessen, J., Michal, M., Schächinger, H., Vögele, C., & Schulz, A. (2016). Making sense of what you sense: Disentangling interoceptive awareness, sensibility and accuracy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, G., Morelli, M., Grässler, B., & Casagrande, M. (2022). Decision making and heart rate variability: A systematic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, R., Pedroni, A., Mata, R., Rieskamp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3(10), e1701381. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, S. N., Critchley, H. D., & Pollatos, O. (2016). The interoceptive system: Implications for cognition, emotion, and health. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 427–443). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, A. M., Critchley, H. D., & Duka, T. (2018). Risk-taking and impulsivity: The role of mood states and interoception. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, A. M., Esposito, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2021). Body in the face of uncertainty: The role of autonomic arousal and interoception in decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Psychophysiology, 58(8), https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., Wang, Y., & Zhang, D. C. (2022). Is risk propensity unique from the big five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Research in Personality, 98, 104206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Silas, J., Todd, J., Stewart, A., Acree, M., Coulson, M., & Mehling, W. E. (2021). Exploring the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness in youth aged 7–17 years. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandasamy, N., Garfinkel, S. N., Page, L., Hardy, B., Critchley, H. D., Gurnell, M., & Coates, J. M. (2016). Interoceptive ability predicts survival on a London trading floor. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 32986. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, P. M., Kantor, L., DeCicco, T. L., & Beck, A. T. (2008). The Beck Anxiety Inventory-Trait (BAIT): A measure of dispositional anxiety not contaminated by dispositional depression. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(5), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802248844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, T., White, R., Zhang, X., Ram, N., & Gatzke-Kopp, L. M. (2022). Decision-making in uncertain contexts: The role of autonomic markers in resolving indecision. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 177, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longarzo, M., D’Olimpio, F., Chiavazzo, A., Santangelo, G., Trojano, L., & Grossi, D. (2015). The relationships between interoception and alexithymic trait. The self-awareness questionnaire in healthy subjects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One, 13(12), e0208034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 7(11), e48230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Brewer, R., Plans, D., Khalsa, S. S., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2020). Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819879826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palminteri, S., & Chevallier, C. (2018). Can we infer inter-individual differences in risk-taking from behavioral tasks? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2017). The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0219-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porges, S. W. (1993). Body perception questionnaire: Laboratory of developmental assessment, psychophysiology. University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, C., & Brener, J. (2018). Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: A comparison of methods to quantify interoception. Psychophysiology, 55(9), e13084. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, G., De Maio, G., & Bottini, G. (2019). Interoceptive sensibility tunes risk-taking behaviour when body-related stimuli come into play. Scientific Reports, 9, 2396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39061-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, G., Fiorina, M. L., De Maio, G., Francescon, E., Ovadia, D., Bernardinelli, L., Santosuosso, A., Paulesu, E., & Bottini, G. (2020). Pathological risk-propensity typifies Mafia members’ cognitive profile. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 8559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65486-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A., Mallory, M. E., & Simon, A. (1989). The body awareness questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(4), 802–815. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoji, M., Mehling, W. E., Hautzinger, M., & Herbert, B. M. (2018). Investigating multidimensional interoceptive awareness in a Japanese population: Validation of the Japanese MAIA-J. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, B., Stupple, E., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2019). Sweating the small stuff: A meta-analysis of skin conductance on the Iowa gambling task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(5), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00744-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol-Hessner, P., Hartley, C. A., Hamilton, J. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2015). Interoceptive ability predicts aversion to losses. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 695–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.925426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, M. D., Seitz, F. I., & Frey, R. (2021). Through the window of my mind: Mapping information integration and the cognitive representations underlying self-reported risk preference. Decision, 8(2), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, B., Wang, D., Su, C., Zhou, H., Wang, T., Mehling, W. E., & Hu, Y. (2022). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2: Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 970982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.970982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Jamovi Project. (2021). Jamovi (1.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J., Barron, D., Aspell, J. E., Toh, E. K. L., Zahari, H. S., Khatib, N. A. M., & Swami, V. (2020). Translation and validation of a bahasa Malaysia (Malay) version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 15(4), e0231048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, J., Swami, V., Aspell, J. E., Furnham, A., Horne, G., & Stieger, S. (2022). Are some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoception. PLoS One, 17(12), e0277894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C., & Reyes-Reyes, A. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) in a Chilean population. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vig, L., Köteles, F., & Ferentzi, E. (2022). Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct. PLoS One, 17(8), e0273299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlemincx, E., Walentynowicz, M., Zamariola, G., Van Oudenhove, L., & Luminet, O. (2023). A novel self-report scale of interoception: The three-domain interoceptive sensations questionnaire (THISQ). Psychology & Health, 1234–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.2009479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Huang, L. (2020). Electrophysiological measurement of emotion and somatic state affecting ambiguity decision: Evidences from SCRs, ERPs, and HR. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamariola, G., Maurage, P., Luminet, O., & Corneille, O. (2018). Interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task are problematic: Evidence from simple bivariate correlations. Biological Psychology, 137, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Nye, C. D. (2019). Development and validation of the general risk propensity scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar